Understanding Complexity: Defining a Moving Target

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Insight Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1002/inst.12552
Rudolph Oosthuizen, Dean Beale, Francesco Dazzi, Andrew C Pickard, Dorothy McKinney, Kenneth Cureton, Eileen Patrice Arnold
{"title":"Understanding Complexity: Defining a Moving Target","authors":"Rudolph Oosthuizen,&nbsp;Dean Beale,&nbsp;Francesco Dazzi,&nbsp;Andrew C Pickard,&nbsp;Dorothy McKinney,&nbsp;Kenneth Cureton,&nbsp;Eileen Patrice Arnold","doi":"10.1002/inst.12552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Systems engineering has transformed its understanding and management of complexity over the past 25 years. This article traces the evolution by analyzing 121 publications from INCOSE's journal and symposium proceedings between 1997 and 2024 to explore how definitions of complexity have shifted from structural metrics to dynamic, context-dependent phenomena shaped by emergent behaviors, stakeholder diversity, and uncertainty. It highlights key distinctions between complicated and complex systems, emphasizing why this matters in design, risk management, and stakeholder engagement. By embracing ambiguity, iterative learning, and multidisciplinary collaboration, engineers can design systems that are resilient and responsive to disruption. The results also underscore the vital role of human factors, including decision-making, cognition, and organizational behavior. We need a mindset shift: success in modern systems engineering depends not on eliminating complexity but on understanding, navigating, and leveraging it to build sustainable, adaptable systems for a changing world.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13956,"journal":{"name":"Insight","volume":"28 4","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://incose.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inst.12552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Systems engineering has transformed its understanding and management of complexity over the past 25 years. This article traces the evolution by analyzing 121 publications from INCOSE's journal and symposium proceedings between 1997 and 2024 to explore how definitions of complexity have shifted from structural metrics to dynamic, context-dependent phenomena shaped by emergent behaviors, stakeholder diversity, and uncertainty. It highlights key distinctions between complicated and complex systems, emphasizing why this matters in design, risk management, and stakeholder engagement. By embracing ambiguity, iterative learning, and multidisciplinary collaboration, engineers can design systems that are resilient and responsive to disruption. The results also underscore the vital role of human factors, including decision-making, cognition, and organizational behavior. We need a mindset shift: success in modern systems engineering depends not on eliminating complexity but on understanding, navigating, and leveraging it to build sustainable, adaptable systems for a changing world.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

理解复杂性:定义移动目标
在过去的25年里,系统工程已经改变了它对复杂性的理解和管理。本文通过分析1997年至2024年间INCOSE期刊和研讨会论文集中的121篇出版物,追溯了复杂性的演变过程,探讨了复杂性的定义如何从结构度量转变为由紧急行为、利益相关者多样性和不确定性形成的动态、情境依赖现象。它强调了复杂系统和复杂系统之间的关键区别,强调了为什么这在设计、风险管理和涉众参与中很重要。通过拥抱模糊性、迭代学习和多学科协作,工程师可以设计出有弹性的系统,并对中断做出反应。研究结果还强调了人为因素的重要作用,包括决策、认知和组织行为。我们需要一种思维方式的转变:现代系统工程的成功并不取决于消除复杂性,而是取决于理解、驾驭和利用复杂性来为不断变化的世界构建可持续的、适应性强的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insight
Insight 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Official Journal of The British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing - includes original research and devlopment papers, technical and scientific reviews and case studies in the fields of NDT and CM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信