Assessing Predictor Robustness in Healthcare Consumer Research: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Anup Menon Nandialath, Uzay Damali
{"title":"Assessing Predictor Robustness in Healthcare Consumer Research: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach","authors":"Anup Menon Nandialath,&nbsp;Uzay Damali","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Healthcare consumers are increasingly acting as active co-producers of their care, especially in the management of chronic diseases, where they assume substantial responsibility throughout the care process. Although research on healthcare consumer behavior is growing, methodological limitations, particularly “researcher degrees of freedom” in variable selection, led to inconsistent conclusions about which service design elements truly influence consumer outcomes. To address this issue, we apply Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate the robustness of key consumer interaction variables across alternative model specifications. Using data from diabetes education programs at six hospitals, we focus on three core service design elements: relational quality (consumer trust in health educators), knowledge types (know-what, know-how, and know-why), and media forms (educational delivery methods such as written material, one-on-one meetings, and group classes). Bayesian model averaging (BMA) reveals that group classes for blood glucose monitoring and practical meal planning know-how emerge as the strongest and most robust predictors across consumer satisfaction, knowledge acquisition, behavior change, and health outcomes. Group-based education formats demonstrated substantially higher robustness compared to individual delivery methods across this intervention hierarchy. Our research highlights the value of BMA in producing more reliable, model-independent insights for consumer research, suggesting that healthcare organizations may achieve greater impact by prioritizing group-based blood glucose monitoring education and practical meal planning knowledge dissemination.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare consumers are increasingly acting as active co-producers of their care, especially in the management of chronic diseases, where they assume substantial responsibility throughout the care process. Although research on healthcare consumer behavior is growing, methodological limitations, particularly “researcher degrees of freedom” in variable selection, led to inconsistent conclusions about which service design elements truly influence consumer outcomes. To address this issue, we apply Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to evaluate the robustness of key consumer interaction variables across alternative model specifications. Using data from diabetes education programs at six hospitals, we focus on three core service design elements: relational quality (consumer trust in health educators), knowledge types (know-what, know-how, and know-why), and media forms (educational delivery methods such as written material, one-on-one meetings, and group classes). Bayesian model averaging (BMA) reveals that group classes for blood glucose monitoring and practical meal planning know-how emerge as the strongest and most robust predictors across consumer satisfaction, knowledge acquisition, behavior change, and health outcomes. Group-based education formats demonstrated substantially higher robustness compared to individual delivery methods across this intervention hierarchy. Our research highlights the value of BMA in producing more reliable, model-independent insights for consumer research, suggesting that healthcare organizations may achieve greater impact by prioritizing group-based blood glucose monitoring education and practical meal planning knowledge dissemination.

在医疗保健消费者研究评估预测稳健性:贝叶斯模型平均方法
医疗保健消费者越来越多地成为其护理的积极共同生产者,特别是在慢性病管理方面,他们在整个护理过程中承担了重大责任。尽管对医疗保健消费者行为的研究正在增长,但方法上的局限性,特别是在变量选择方面的“研究人员自由度”,导致关于哪些服务设计元素真正影响消费者结果的结论不一致。为了解决这个问题,我们应用贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)来评估跨可选模型规范的关键消费者交互变量的鲁棒性。利用六家医院糖尿病教育项目的数据,我们关注三个核心服务设计元素:关系质量(消费者对健康教育者的信任)、知识类型(知道什么、知道诀窍和为什么知道)和媒体形式(书面材料、一对一会议和小组课程等教育传递方法)。贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)显示,血糖监测和实用膳食计划知识的分组分类是消费者满意度、知识获取、行为改变和健康结果的最强和最可靠的预测因素。在整个干预层次中,与个人交付方法相比,以群体为基础的教育形式表现出更高的稳健性。我们的研究强调了BMA在为消费者研究提供更可靠、独立于模型的见解方面的价值,这表明医疗机构可以通过优先考虑基于群体的血糖监测教育和实用的膳食计划知识传播来实现更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信