Genetic Support for the Increased Risk of Erectile Dysfunction in Prostate Cancer: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ANDROLOGY
Andrologia Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI:10.1155/and/8130830
Miaoyong Ye, Song Chen, Junwei Wang, Cunming Zhang, Zhongbiao Wu, Jianxiong Ma, Baijun Chen, Fan Zhao
{"title":"Genetic Support for the Increased Risk of Erectile Dysfunction in Prostate Cancer: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study","authors":"Miaoyong Ye,&nbsp;Song Chen,&nbsp;Junwei Wang,&nbsp;Cunming Zhang,&nbsp;Zhongbiao Wu,&nbsp;Jianxiong Ma,&nbsp;Baijun Chen,&nbsp;Fan Zhao","doi":"10.1155/and/8130830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epidemiological evidence has shown that prostate cancer (PCa) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are factors of increased mutual risk. However, the causal relationship between PCa and ED remains elusive due to the methodological limitations of traditional observational studies. Thus, we performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between PCa and ED. We used genome-wide association studies of PCa and ED to obtain single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analysis tool to obtain causal effects, and we adopted an MR–Egger, weighted median, simple, and weighted model for the complementary analysis. Using univariable MR, genetic evidence indicated that PCa has a causal genetic liability effect on ED using both the explored and the replicate dataset (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.17, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001 and OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48–1.78, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the combined result of the meta-analysis (inverse variance weighting [IVW]: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.23, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the reverse direction, ED showed no genetic liability on PCa (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.06, <i>p</i> = 0.759 and OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93–1.48, <i>p</i> = 0.172). In multivariate MR, the association remained after eliminating the confounders to estimate the direct causal effect of PCa on ED (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). This study provided genetic evidence suggesting that PCa has a causal effect on increased ED risk, but ED showed no such effect on PCa.</p>","PeriodicalId":7817,"journal":{"name":"Andrologia","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/and/8130830","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/and/8130830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence has shown that prostate cancer (PCa) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are factors of increased mutual risk. However, the causal relationship between PCa and ED remains elusive due to the methodological limitations of traditional observational studies. Thus, we performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between PCa and ED. We used genome-wide association studies of PCa and ED to obtain single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary analysis tool to obtain causal effects, and we adopted an MR–Egger, weighted median, simple, and weighted model for the complementary analysis. Using univariable MR, genetic evidence indicated that PCa has a causal genetic liability effect on ED using both the explored and the replicate dataset (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.17, p < 0.001 and OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.48–1.78, p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the combined result of the meta-analysis (inverse variance weighting [IVW]: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12–1.23, p < 0.001). In the reverse direction, ED showed no genetic liability on PCa (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96–1.06, p = 0.759 and OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93–1.48, p = 0.172). In multivariate MR, the association remained after eliminating the confounders to estimate the direct causal effect of PCa on ED (all p < 0.001). This study provided genetic evidence suggesting that PCa has a causal effect on increased ED risk, but ED showed no such effect on PCa.

Abstract Image

前列腺癌患者勃起功能障碍风险增加的遗传支持:一项双向孟德尔随机研究
流行病学证据表明,前列腺癌(PCa)和勃起功能障碍(ED)是相互风险增加的因素。然而,由于传统观察性研究方法的局限性,PCa和ED之间的因果关系仍然难以捉摸。因此,我们进行了一项双向双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)研究,以研究PCa和ED之间的因果关系。我们使用PCa和ED的全基因组关联研究来获得单核苷酸多态性(snp)。采用方差逆加权法作为主要分析工具获得因果关系,补充分析采用MR-Egger、加权中位数、简单、加权模型。使用单变量MR,遗传证据表明PCa对ED有因果遗传倾向性影响(优势比[OR] 1.11, 95%置信区间[CI] 1.06-1.17, p < 0.001; OR为1.62,95% CI为1.48-1.78,p < 0.001)。此外,meta分析的综合结果(方差反加权[IVW]: OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.12-1.23, p < 0.001)。相反,ED对PCa没有遗传倾向(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.06, p = 0.759; OR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.93-1.48, p = 0.172)。在多变量MR中,在消除混杂因素以估计PCa对ED的直接因果影响后,相关性仍然存在(p < 0.001)。本研究提供的遗传证据表明,前列腺癌与ED风险增加有因果关系,但ED对前列腺癌没有这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Andrologia
Andrologia 医学-男科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
292
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Andrologia provides an international forum for original papers on the current clinical, morphological, biochemical, and experimental status of organic male infertility and sexual disorders in men. The articles inform on the whole process of advances in andrology (including the aging male), from fundamental research to therapeutic developments worldwide. First published in 1969 and the first international journal of andrology, it is a well established journal in this expanding area of reproductive medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信