Fairness Evaluation of Neural Networks Through Computational Profile Likelihood

IF 1.7 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Benjamin Djian, Ettore Merlo, Sébastien Gambs, Rosin Claude Ngueveu
{"title":"Fairness Evaluation of Neural Networks Through Computational Profile Likelihood","authors":"Benjamin Djian,&nbsp;Ettore Merlo,&nbsp;Sébastien Gambs,&nbsp;Rosin Claude Ngueveu","doi":"10.1111/coin.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite high predictive performance, machine learning models can be unfair towards specific demographic subgroups characterized by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. This paper presents a novel approach using Computational Profile Likelihood (CPL) to assess potential bias in neural network decisions with respect to sensitive attributes. CPL estimates the conditional probability of a network's internal neuron excitation levels during predictions. To assess the impact of sensitive attributes on predictions, the CPL distribution of individuals sharing a particular value of a sensitive attribute and a specific outcome (e.g., “women” and “high income”) is compared to a subgroup sharing another value of the sensitive attribute but with the same outcome (e.g., “men” and “high income”). The resulting disparities between distributions can be used to quantify the bias with respect to the sensitive attribute and the outcome class. We also assess the efficacy of bias reduction techniques through their influence on the resulting disparities. Experimental results on three widely used datasets indicate that the CPL of the trained models can be used to characterize significant differences between multiple protected groups, highlighting that these models display quantifiable biases. Furthermore, after applying bias mitigation methods, the gaps in CPL distributions are reduced, indicating a more similar internal representation for profiles of different protected groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55228,"journal":{"name":"Computational Intelligence","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/coin.70124","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coin.70124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high predictive performance, machine learning models can be unfair towards specific demographic subgroups characterized by sensitive attributes such as gender or race. This paper presents a novel approach using Computational Profile Likelihood (CPL) to assess potential bias in neural network decisions with respect to sensitive attributes. CPL estimates the conditional probability of a network's internal neuron excitation levels during predictions. To assess the impact of sensitive attributes on predictions, the CPL distribution of individuals sharing a particular value of a sensitive attribute and a specific outcome (e.g., “women” and “high income”) is compared to a subgroup sharing another value of the sensitive attribute but with the same outcome (e.g., “men” and “high income”). The resulting disparities between distributions can be used to quantify the bias with respect to the sensitive attribute and the outcome class. We also assess the efficacy of bias reduction techniques through their influence on the resulting disparities. Experimental results on three widely used datasets indicate that the CPL of the trained models can be used to characterize significant differences between multiple protected groups, highlighting that these models display quantifiable biases. Furthermore, after applying bias mitigation methods, the gaps in CPL distributions are reduced, indicating a more similar internal representation for profiles of different protected groups.

Abstract Image

基于计算轮廓似然的神经网络公平性评价
尽管具有很高的预测性能,但机器学习模型对于以性别或种族等敏感属性为特征的特定人口统计子群体可能不公平。本文提出了一种利用计算轮廓似然(CPL)来评估神经网络决策中有关敏感属性的潜在偏差的新方法。CPL在预测期间估计网络内部神经元兴奋水平的条件概率。为了评估敏感属性对预测的影响,将共享敏感属性的特定值和特定结果(例如,“女性”和“高收入”)的个体的CPL分布与共享敏感属性的另一个值但具有相同结果的子组(例如,“男性”和“高收入”)进行比较。分布之间的差异可以用来量化相对于敏感属性和结果类别的偏差。我们还通过减少偏倚技术对产生的差异的影响来评估其有效性。在三个广泛使用的数据集上的实验结果表明,训练模型的CPL可以用来表征多个保护群体之间的显著差异,突出表明这些模型显示出可量化的偏差。此外,在应用偏见缓解方法后,CPL分布的差距减小,表明不同保护群体概况的内部表示更加相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Intelligence
Computational Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This leading international journal promotes and stimulates research in the field of artificial intelligence (AI). Covering a wide range of issues - from the tools and languages of AI to its philosophical implications - Computational Intelligence provides a vigorous forum for the publication of both experimental and theoretical research, as well as surveys and impact studies. The journal is designed to meet the needs of a wide range of AI workers in academic and industrial research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信