Ross Young, Melanie Ramdarshan-Bold, Christina Clark, Sarah McGeown
{"title":"‘It's healthy. It's good for you’: Children's perspectives on utilising their autonomy in the writing classroom","authors":"Ross Young, Melanie Ramdarshan-Bold, Christina Clark, Sarah McGeown","doi":"10.1111/lit.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Growing concern about children's writing motivation highlights the need for more research that foregrounds pupil autonomy and examines how classroom practices influence students' sense of agency and control in their writing. This study adopts a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective to explore the role of autonomy and locus of control in shaping writing motivation among primary-aged students. Specifically, it reports on a qualitative interview study with 24 children (aged 9–11, 50% female) from three primary schools in England, focusing on their feelings and experiences of autonomy in relation to school-based writing. Thematic analysis, illustrated within Graham's (2018) production strategies for writing, identified three key themes relating to children's perceptions of the locus of control for their writing and the extent to which this was held by, or shared between, the teachers or themselves, with (a) teacher-controlled writing, (b) student-controlled writing and (c) collaboratively-controlled writing themes identified. Children's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teacher and student-controlled writing are discussed, before their thoughts on a ‘collaboratively-controlled writing’ approach are shared. This research provides novel and important insights for educators, researchers and policy-makers into how collaboratively-controlled writing projects could enhance primary students' writing motivation, and contributes to current discourse on effective and affecting writing pedagogy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"59 3","pages":"372-384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lit.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing concern about children's writing motivation highlights the need for more research that foregrounds pupil autonomy and examines how classroom practices influence students' sense of agency and control in their writing. This study adopts a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective to explore the role of autonomy and locus of control in shaping writing motivation among primary-aged students. Specifically, it reports on a qualitative interview study with 24 children (aged 9–11, 50% female) from three primary schools in England, focusing on their feelings and experiences of autonomy in relation to school-based writing. Thematic analysis, illustrated within Graham's (2018) production strategies for writing, identified three key themes relating to children's perceptions of the locus of control for their writing and the extent to which this was held by, or shared between, the teachers or themselves, with (a) teacher-controlled writing, (b) student-controlled writing and (c) collaboratively-controlled writing themes identified. Children's perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of teacher and student-controlled writing are discussed, before their thoughts on a ‘collaboratively-controlled writing’ approach are shared. This research provides novel and important insights for educators, researchers and policy-makers into how collaboratively-controlled writing projects could enhance primary students' writing motivation, and contributes to current discourse on effective and affecting writing pedagogy.
期刊介绍:
Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.