Seismic performance of dual RC frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel shear walls: insights and recommendations

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Mohammad Yakhkeshi, Payam Tehrani
{"title":"Seismic performance of dual RC frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel shear walls: insights and recommendations","authors":"Mohammad Yakhkeshi,&nbsp;Payam Tehrani","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel system irregularities under both far-field and near-field ground motions. Utilizing nonlinear time history analysis and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), seven six-story RC models—comprising one regular and six irregular configurations—are analyzed to evaluate collapse capacities, torsional responses, and story drift demands. The findings challenge the classification criteria in ASCE 7–22, revealing that minor wall inclinations (up to ~ 14°) have a negligible impact on collapse capacity, whereas more pronounced inclinations (~26.5°) significantly increase local seismic demands and compromise structural performance. The results suggest that local wall inclinations have a more significant impact on collapse resistance than overall torsional irregularity, highlighting the need for refined regularity classifications that consider localized effects rather than relying solely on global torsional behavior. Although enhanced design strategies improved collapse resistance, they failed to ensure secure performance in highly irregular models, even when fully compliant with seismic code provisions. Near-field ground motions intensified structural vulnerabilities, prompting earlier collapse onset and necessitating stricter criteria for distinguishing between regular and irregular models. These findings underscore the challenges posed by short-duration, high-intensity seismic pulses and the limitations of current design provisions in mitigating their effects. This study emphasizes the need for refined classification criteria and performance-based design improvements to better capture the complex behavior of nonparallel system irregularities, offering critical insights for developing more resilient structural design frameworks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 11","pages":"4831 - 4869"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02233-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance of reinforced concrete (RC) dual frame-shear wall buildings with nonparallel system irregularities under both far-field and near-field ground motions. Utilizing nonlinear time history analysis and Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA), seven six-story RC models—comprising one regular and six irregular configurations—are analyzed to evaluate collapse capacities, torsional responses, and story drift demands. The findings challenge the classification criteria in ASCE 7–22, revealing that minor wall inclinations (up to ~ 14°) have a negligible impact on collapse capacity, whereas more pronounced inclinations (~26.5°) significantly increase local seismic demands and compromise structural performance. The results suggest that local wall inclinations have a more significant impact on collapse resistance than overall torsional irregularity, highlighting the need for refined regularity classifications that consider localized effects rather than relying solely on global torsional behavior. Although enhanced design strategies improved collapse resistance, they failed to ensure secure performance in highly irregular models, even when fully compliant with seismic code provisions. Near-field ground motions intensified structural vulnerabilities, prompting earlier collapse onset and necessitating stricter criteria for distinguishing between regular and irregular models. These findings underscore the challenges posed by short-duration, high-intensity seismic pulses and the limitations of current design provisions in mitigating their effects. This study emphasizes the need for refined classification criteria and performance-based design improvements to better capture the complex behavior of nonparallel system irregularities, offering critical insights for developing more resilient structural design frameworks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

具有非平行剪力墙的双层钢筋混凝土框架-剪力墙建筑的抗震性能:见解和建议
本文研究了具有非平行体系不规则结构的钢筋混凝土双框架-剪力墙结构在远场和近场地震动作用下的抗震性能。利用非线性时程分析和增量动力分析(IDA),分析了七个六层RC模型,包括一个规则和六个不规则配置,以评估倒塌能力,扭转响应和楼层漂移需求。研究结果挑战了ASCE 7-22的分类标准,揭示了较小的墙壁倾角(高达~ 14°)对倒塌能力的影响可以忽略,而更明显的倾斜(~26.5°)会显著增加局部地震需求并损害结构性能。结果表明,与整体扭转不规则性相比,局部壁面倾角对抗倒塌能力的影响更为显著,这凸显了对考虑局部影响而不是仅仅依赖整体扭转行为的精细规则分类的需求。尽管增强的设计策略提高了抗倒塌能力,但即使在完全符合抗震规范规定的情况下,它们也无法确保高度不规则模型的安全性能。近场地面运动加剧了结构的脆弱性,促使更早的崩溃发生,需要更严格的标准来区分规则和不规则模型。这些发现强调了短持续时间、高强度地震脉冲带来的挑战,以及当前设计规定在减轻其影响方面的局限性。本研究强调需要改进分类标准和基于性能的设计改进,以更好地捕捉非并行系统不规则性的复杂行为,为开发更具弹性的结构设计框架提供关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信