Retrospective identification and pathogenicity of Aeromonas dhakensis in freshwater fish

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Rahul Rajendran, Ha Thanh Dong, Nguyen Dinh-Hung, Sumit Vinod Jungi, Krishna R. Salin, Saengchan Senapin
{"title":"Retrospective identification and pathogenicity of Aeromonas dhakensis in freshwater fish","authors":"Rahul Rajendran,&nbsp;Ha Thanh Dong,&nbsp;Nguyen Dinh-Hung,&nbsp;Sumit Vinod Jungi,&nbsp;Krishna R. Salin,&nbsp;Saengchan Senapin","doi":"10.1007/s10499-025-02172-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Motile <i>Aeromonas</i> species, which are pathogenic to freshwater fish, constitute a complex group characterized by closely related phenotypic traits. This phenotypic similarity has historically contributed to frequent misidentification, most notably the incorrect classification of diverse isolates as <i>Aeromonas hydrophila</i>. In this study, we retrospectively identified five isolates, previously presumed to be <i>A. hydrophila</i>, which were collected during disease outbreaks in tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> sp.) and striped catfish (<i>Pangasianodon hypophthalmus</i>) dating back to the period 2010–2017. A polyphasic approach, combining phenotypic characterization, sequencing of four housekeeping genes (16S rRNA, <i>rpoB</i>, <i>rpoD</i>, and <i>gyrB</i>), and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), revealed that four of the isolates were in fact <i>Aeromonas dhakensis</i>, while only one was confirmed as <i>A. hydrophila</i>. Representatives of both species were selected to assess pathogenicity in juvenile Nile tilapia through intraperitoneal injection at three different bacterial doses (10<sup>5</sup>, 10<sup>6</sup>, and 10<sup>7</sup> CFU/fish), followed by a 14-day observation period. The results showed dose-dependent mortality, ranging from 10 to 100% for <i>A. dhakensis</i> and 30% to 90% for <i>A. hydrophila</i>. Infected fish exhibited similar clinical signs and histopathological changes regardless of the bacterial species. These findings suggest that <i>A. dhakensis</i> is an overlooked pathogenic species capable of causing disease in tilapia and potentially other freshwater fish, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and the development of effective control measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8122,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture International","volume":"33 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-025-02172-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motile Aeromonas species, which are pathogenic to freshwater fish, constitute a complex group characterized by closely related phenotypic traits. This phenotypic similarity has historically contributed to frequent misidentification, most notably the incorrect classification of diverse isolates as Aeromonas hydrophila. In this study, we retrospectively identified five isolates, previously presumed to be A. hydrophila, which were collected during disease outbreaks in tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) and striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) dating back to the period 2010–2017. A polyphasic approach, combining phenotypic characterization, sequencing of four housekeeping genes (16S rRNA, rpoB, rpoD, and gyrB), and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), revealed that four of the isolates were in fact Aeromonas dhakensis, while only one was confirmed as A. hydrophila. Representatives of both species were selected to assess pathogenicity in juvenile Nile tilapia through intraperitoneal injection at three different bacterial doses (105, 106, and 107 CFU/fish), followed by a 14-day observation period. The results showed dose-dependent mortality, ranging from 10 to 100% for A. dhakensis and 30% to 90% for A. hydrophila. Infected fish exhibited similar clinical signs and histopathological changes regardless of the bacterial species. These findings suggest that A. dhakensis is an overlooked pathogenic species capable of causing disease in tilapia and potentially other freshwater fish, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and the development of effective control measures.

淡水鱼达肯气单胞菌的回顾性鉴定及其致病性
运动气单胞菌是淡水鱼的致病菌,是一个表型性状密切相关的复杂类群。这种表型相似性在历史上导致了频繁的错误识别,最明显的是将不同的分离株错误地分类为嗜水气单胞菌。在这项研究中,我们回顾性地鉴定了5株分离株,以前被认为是嗜水拟南杆菌,它们是在2010-2017年期间罗非鱼(Oreochromis sp.)和条纹鲶鱼(Pangasianodon hypophthalmus)疾病暴发期间收集的。采用多相方法,结合表型表征、4个持家基因(16S rRNA、rpoB、rpoD和gyrB)的测序和多位点序列分析(MLSA),发现4株分离株实际上是达肯气单胞菌,而只有1株被确认为嗜水单胞菌。通过腹腔注射三种不同的细菌剂量(105、106和107 CFU/鱼),选择这两种物种的代表来评估尼罗罗非鱼幼鱼的致病性,随后进行14天的观察期。结果显示,致死率呈剂量依赖性,达肯芽孢杆菌的致死率为10% ~ 100%,而嗜水芽孢杆菌的致死率为30% ~ 90%。受感染的鱼表现出相似的临床症状和组织病理学变化,无论细菌种类如何。这些发现表明,达肯芽孢杆菌是一种被忽视的致病物种,能够引起罗非鱼和其他潜在淡水鱼的疾病,强调需要继续监测和制定有效的控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquaculture International
Aquaculture International 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Aquaculture International is an international journal publishing original research papers, short communications, technical notes and review papers on all aspects of aquaculture. The Journal covers topics such as the biology, physiology, pathology and genetics of cultured fish, crustaceans, molluscs and plants, especially new species; water quality of supply systems, fluctuations in water quality within farms and the environmental impacts of aquacultural operations; nutrition, feeding and stocking practices, especially as they affect the health and growth rates of cultured species; sustainable production techniques; bioengineering studies on the design and management of offshore and land-based systems; the improvement of quality and marketing of farmed products; sociological and societal impacts of aquaculture, and more. This is the official Journal of the European Aquaculture Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信