Probabilistic failure mode-based prediction method for flexural design capacities of precast reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete beams

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yukun Hu, Jitao Yao, Kaikai Cheng, Luyang Zhang, Meng Ran, Hao Li, Jiewei Xu
{"title":"Probabilistic failure mode-based prediction method for flexural design capacities of precast reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete beams","authors":"Yukun Hu,&nbsp;Jitao Yao,&nbsp;Kaikai Cheng,&nbsp;Luyang Zhang,&nbsp;Meng Ran,&nbsp;Hao Li,&nbsp;Jiewei Xu","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02219-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the growing use of precast concrete structures in construction, the reliability-based design (RBD) of bending capabilities of precast reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed reinforced concrete (PRC) beams has become increasingly important. Traditional RBD methods, such as the partial safety factor design (PSFD), suffer from limited precast beam data for calibration and fail to consider the impact of different failure modes on flexural capacity. This oversight can lead to an unreliable estimated flexural design capacity. Hence, a robust RBD approach must account for the unique features of precast beams, including limited sample sizes and failure modes. In this study, a probabilistic failure mode-based design model for evaluating the flexural capacities of precast RC/PRC beams was developed and integrated with the probabilistic confidence-based estimation (PCBE) RBD method, which is suitable for small samples. This combined approach enables reliable estimation of flexural design capacities of precast RC/PRC beams. The proposed resistance design model was validated against the maximum bending moments of 74 RC and 69 PRC beams. Comparative analysis indicates that the predicted flexural capacities align well with experimental results. Furthermore, the validity of the combined method was verified using collected test datasets of RC/PRC beams, and partial safety factors corresponding to different failure modes were provided. The proposed method offers a practical approach for conducting effective reliability analysis of precast RC structures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 11","pages":"4463 - 4498"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02219-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the growing use of precast concrete structures in construction, the reliability-based design (RBD) of bending capabilities of precast reinforced concrete (RC) and prestressed reinforced concrete (PRC) beams has become increasingly important. Traditional RBD methods, such as the partial safety factor design (PSFD), suffer from limited precast beam data for calibration and fail to consider the impact of different failure modes on flexural capacity. This oversight can lead to an unreliable estimated flexural design capacity. Hence, a robust RBD approach must account for the unique features of precast beams, including limited sample sizes and failure modes. In this study, a probabilistic failure mode-based design model for evaluating the flexural capacities of precast RC/PRC beams was developed and integrated with the probabilistic confidence-based estimation (PCBE) RBD method, which is suitable for small samples. This combined approach enables reliable estimation of flexural design capacities of precast RC/PRC beams. The proposed resistance design model was validated against the maximum bending moments of 74 RC and 69 PRC beams. Comparative analysis indicates that the predicted flexural capacities align well with experimental results. Furthermore, the validity of the combined method was verified using collected test datasets of RC/PRC beams, and partial safety factors corresponding to different failure modes were provided. The proposed method offers a practical approach for conducting effective reliability analysis of precast RC structures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于概率破坏模式的预制钢筋混凝土和预应力混凝土梁抗弯设计承载力预测方法
随着预制混凝土结构在建筑中的应用越来越广泛,基于可靠度的预制钢筋混凝土和预应力钢筋混凝土梁的抗弯性能设计变得越来越重要。传统的RBD方法,如部分安全系数设计(PSFD),由于用于校准的预制梁数据有限,并且没有考虑不同破坏模式对抗弯能力的影响。这种疏忽可能导致不可靠的估计弯曲设计能力。因此,稳健的RBD方法必须考虑预制梁的独特特征,包括有限的样本量和破坏模式。本文建立了一种基于概率破坏模型的RC/PRC预制梁抗弯承载力评估设计模型,并将其与基于概率置信度估计(PCBE)的RBD方法相结合,该方法适用于小样本情况。这种组合方法可以可靠地估计预制RC/PRC梁的抗弯设计能力。针对74 RC和69 PRC梁的最大弯矩,验证了所提出的阻力设计模型。对比分析表明,预测抗弯承载力与试验结果吻合较好。利用收集到的RC/PRC梁试验数据验证了组合方法的有效性,并给出了不同破坏模式对应的部分安全系数。该方法为钢筋混凝土预制结构进行有效的可靠度分析提供了一种实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信