V. E. Asming, A. N. Morozov, A. V. Fedorov, N. V. Vaganova
{"title":"ProLom Program for Probabilistic Location of Earthquakes Using Macroseismic and Instrumental Data","authors":"V. E. Asming, A. N. Morozov, A. V. Fedorov, N. V. Vaganova","doi":"10.3103/S0747923925700227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article is devoted to addressing the critical issue of increasing the reliability of estimates of the parameters of seismic events that occurred during the formation of instrumental observational seismology. Catalogs of this period are characterized by an extremely limited set of instrumentally determined phases, but are accompanied by descriptions of observed macroseismic effects. Previously, the authors proposed a probabilistic method for determining the epicenters and magnitudes of earthquakes based on a joint analysis of their macroseismic and instrumental data. For software implementation of the method, the ProLom program (Probabilistic Locator by Macroseismics) was created. The input data of the program are the values of intensity data points (IDP’s) on the MSK-64 scale and the coordinates of points where the earthquake was observed with these intensities, as well as the arrival times of seismic phases from the bulletins of seismic stations and their coordinates. Based on instrumental and macroseismic data for the test earthquake of May 20, 1967, various combinations of initial data were prepared in order to assess the applicability of the method depending on the distance of seismic stations, the amount of macroseismic information (IDP’s), azimuthal coverage of the source points-intensity values and the range of variations in intensity values. The minimum (boundary) conditions for the applicability of the method were identified: the presence of seismic stations, regardless of the number, at a distance of up to 2000 km from the epicenter and recording of at least two seismic phases, at least 7 IDP’s, and azimuthal coverage of the source with points-intensity values of at least 155°.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":"61 2","pages":"140 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923925700227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article is devoted to addressing the critical issue of increasing the reliability of estimates of the parameters of seismic events that occurred during the formation of instrumental observational seismology. Catalogs of this period are characterized by an extremely limited set of instrumentally determined phases, but are accompanied by descriptions of observed macroseismic effects. Previously, the authors proposed a probabilistic method for determining the epicenters and magnitudes of earthquakes based on a joint analysis of their macroseismic and instrumental data. For software implementation of the method, the ProLom program (Probabilistic Locator by Macroseismics) was created. The input data of the program are the values of intensity data points (IDP’s) on the MSK-64 scale and the coordinates of points where the earthquake was observed with these intensities, as well as the arrival times of seismic phases from the bulletins of seismic stations and their coordinates. Based on instrumental and macroseismic data for the test earthquake of May 20, 1967, various combinations of initial data were prepared in order to assess the applicability of the method depending on the distance of seismic stations, the amount of macroseismic information (IDP’s), azimuthal coverage of the source points-intensity values and the range of variations in intensity values. The minimum (boundary) conditions for the applicability of the method were identified: the presence of seismic stations, regardless of the number, at a distance of up to 2000 km from the epicenter and recording of at least two seismic phases, at least 7 IDP’s, and azimuthal coverage of the source with points-intensity values of at least 155°.
本文致力于解决提高在仪器观测地震学形成过程中发生的地震事件参数估计的可靠性的关键问题。这一时期的地震目录以仪器确定的极有限的一组相为特征,但附有观测到的宏观地震效应的描述。在此之前,作者提出了一种基于宏观地震数据和仪器数据的联合分析来确定震中和震级的概率方法。为了在软件上实现该方法,创建了ProLom程序(Probabilistic Locator by Macroseismics)。程序输入的数据是MSK-64震级上的烈度数据点(IDP)值和以这些烈度观测到地震的点的坐标,以及地震台站公告中的地震相到达时间及其坐标。以1967年5月20日试验地震的仪器资料和宏观地震资料为基础,根据地震台站距离、宏观地震信息量、震源点的方位覆盖-烈度值和烈度值的变化范围,编制了不同的初始数据组合,以评估该方法的适用性。确定了该方法适用性的最小(边界)条件:无论地震台站数量多少,在距离震中2000公里的范围内存在地震台站,记录至少两个地震相,至少7 IDP,震源的方位角覆盖范围至少为155°。
期刊介绍:
Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.