Study of the Relationship between Peak Ground Accelerations in Fault Zones of Strong Earthquakes and Magnitude and Distance from the Source Based on a Large Dataset (Verification of Regulatory Formulas SP 286.1325800.2016 “Critical Infrastructure: Rules for Detailed Seismic Zoning”)

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
E. V. Descherevskaya, O. V. Pavlenko
{"title":"Study of the Relationship between Peak Ground Accelerations in Fault Zones of Strong Earthquakes and Magnitude and Distance from the Source Based on a Large Dataset (Verification of Regulatory Formulas SP 286.1325800.2016 “Critical Infrastructure: Rules for Detailed Seismic Zoning”)","authors":"E. V. Descherevskaya,&nbsp;O. V. Pavlenko","doi":"10.3103/S0747923925700252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To verify the regulatory formulas SP 286.1325800.2016, records obtained by stations of the K-NET and KiK-net strong motion networks in Japan were studied. The peak ground accelerations recorded during strong earthquakes in three magnitude ranges—6.6–6.7, 6.8–7.0, and 7.1–7.3—and calculated using the SP formulas were compared. A large scatter of experimental acceleration values for fixed magnitudes and distances from the source was obtained, associated with the dependence of peak ground accelerations on the characteristics of the source and wave propagation medium (orientation of the fault plane and distribution of displacements on it, released stress, source spectrum, frequency-dependent quality factor of the medium, local frequency-dependent amplification, soil response, surface topography and internal boundaries, etc.). Calculations using the SP regulatory formulas are based on clouds of experimental data, but significantly underestimate peak ground accelerations, especially in the focal and near zones. The SP regulatory formulas provide only approximate estimates that can be used as a reference, but in practice, for critical infrastructure, more reliable methods for assessing peak ground accelerations and other parameters of seismic impacts should be used, taking into account regional characteristics and recurrence periods of earthquakes, with elements of probabilistic analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":"61 1","pages":"15 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923925700252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To verify the regulatory formulas SP 286.1325800.2016, records obtained by stations of the K-NET and KiK-net strong motion networks in Japan were studied. The peak ground accelerations recorded during strong earthquakes in three magnitude ranges—6.6–6.7, 6.8–7.0, and 7.1–7.3—and calculated using the SP formulas were compared. A large scatter of experimental acceleration values for fixed magnitudes and distances from the source was obtained, associated with the dependence of peak ground accelerations on the characteristics of the source and wave propagation medium (orientation of the fault plane and distribution of displacements on it, released stress, source spectrum, frequency-dependent quality factor of the medium, local frequency-dependent amplification, soil response, surface topography and internal boundaries, etc.). Calculations using the SP regulatory formulas are based on clouds of experimental data, but significantly underestimate peak ground accelerations, especially in the focal and near zones. The SP regulatory formulas provide only approximate estimates that can be used as a reference, but in practice, for critical infrastructure, more reliable methods for assessing peak ground accelerations and other parameters of seismic impacts should be used, taking into account regional characteristics and recurrence periods of earthquakes, with elements of probabilistic analysis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于大数据的强震断裂带地面加速度峰值与震级和震源距离关系研究(SP 286.1325800.2016《关键基础设施:详细地震区划规则》规范公式验证)
为了验证SP 286.1325800.2016的调节公式,对日本K-NET和KiK-net强震台网台站的记录进行了研究。对比了使用SP公式计算的3个震级范围(6.6 - 6.7、6.8-7.0和7.1 - 7.3)强震记录的地面加速度峰值。对于固定震级和距离震源的实验加速度值,得到了很大的分散,这与震源和波传播介质特性(断层面的方向和位移分布、释放应力、震源谱、介质的频率相关质量因子、局部频率相关放大、土壤响应、表面地形和内部边界)对峰值地面加速度的依赖性有关。等等)。使用SP规则公式的计算基于大量实验数据,但明显低估了峰值地面加速度,特别是在震源区和附近区域。SP规范公式仅提供可作为参考的近似估计,但在实践中,对于关键基础设施,应使用更可靠的方法来评估峰值地面加速度和地震影响的其他参数,同时考虑到地震的区域特征和复发周期,并结合概率分析的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismic Instruments
Seismic Instruments GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
44.40%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信