Samuel Stuart, Rodrigo Vitorio, Lisa Graham, Julia Das, Richard Walker, Claire McDonald, Martina Mancini, Rosie Morris
{"title":"Digital Cueing With Laser Shoes Does Not Improve Walking in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence Across Disease Severity and Freezing Status.","authors":"Samuel Stuart, Rodrigo Vitorio, Lisa Graham, Julia Das, Richard Walker, Claire McDonald, Martina Mancini, Rosie Morris","doi":"10.1177/15459683251369477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gait impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) occurs early and pharmaceutical interventions do not fully restore this function. Visual cueing has been shown to improve gait and alleviate freezing of gait (FOG) in PD. Technological development of digital laser shoe visual cues now allows for visual cues to be used continuously when walking. This study aimed to investigate the effects of laser shoe visual cueing on gait in people with PD across different disease severity (i.e., Hoehn & Yahr [H&Y] stages I-III) and FOG status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty people with PD (H&YI = 20, H&YII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG], H&YIII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG]) walked a 10 m straight path (back and forth) self-paced for 80 seconds without and then with laser shoe cues (participants were allowed 1-2 walks to familiarize with the cues). Inertial sensors were used to measure gait metrics. Laser cue line was set to usual step length for individuals based on their usual walk data from the inertial sensors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laser shoe cueing did not improve gait in PD regardless of disease severity or FOG status. Across all groups, participants decreased gait speed (<i>P</i> < .001), cadence (<i>P</i> < .001), arm range of motion (<i>P</i> < .005), and increased stride time, double support time (<i>P</i> < .001), elevation at midswing (<i>P</i> < .001), and gait variability (<i>P</i> < .001) with the laser shoes compared to usual walking.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital laser shoe visual cues do not improve gait in people with PD across disease severity or FOG status. Further investigation is required to examine different cue settings or exposure periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683251369477"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251369477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gait impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD) occurs early and pharmaceutical interventions do not fully restore this function. Visual cueing has been shown to improve gait and alleviate freezing of gait (FOG) in PD. Technological development of digital laser shoe visual cues now allows for visual cues to be used continuously when walking. This study aimed to investigate the effects of laser shoe visual cueing on gait in people with PD across different disease severity (i.e., Hoehn & Yahr [H&Y] stages I-III) and FOG status.
Methods: Eighty people with PD (H&YI = 20, H&YII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG], H&YIII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG]) walked a 10 m straight path (back and forth) self-paced for 80 seconds without and then with laser shoe cues (participants were allowed 1-2 walks to familiarize with the cues). Inertial sensors were used to measure gait metrics. Laser cue line was set to usual step length for individuals based on their usual walk data from the inertial sensors.
Results: Laser shoe cueing did not improve gait in PD regardless of disease severity or FOG status. Across all groups, participants decreased gait speed (P < .001), cadence (P < .001), arm range of motion (P < .005), and increased stride time, double support time (P < .001), elevation at midswing (P < .001), and gait variability (P < .001) with the laser shoes compared to usual walking.
Conclusion: Digital laser shoe visual cues do not improve gait in people with PD across disease severity or FOG status. Further investigation is required to examine different cue settings or exposure periods.
背景:帕金森病(PD)的步态障碍发生早期,药物干预并不能完全恢复这种功能。视觉提示已被证明可以改善PD患者的步态,减轻步态冻结(FOG)。数字激光鞋视觉提示技术的发展现在允许在行走时连续使用视觉提示。本研究旨在探讨激光鞋视觉提示对PD患者不同疾病严重程度(即Hoehn & Yahr [H&Y] I-III期)和FOG状态下步态的影响。方法:80名PD患者(H&YI = 20, H&YII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG], H&YIII = 30 [15 FOG, 15 noFOG])在没有激光鞋线索的情况下,自行步行10米直线(来回)80秒,然后再使用激光鞋线索(参与者被允许走1-2次以熟悉线索)。惯性传感器用于测量步态指标。激光提示线被设置为通常的步长为个人根据他们通常的行走数据从惯性传感器。结果:激光鞋提示不能改善PD患者的步态,无论疾病严重程度或FOG状态如何。在所有组中,参与者的步态速度都降低了(P P P P P P P P)结论:数字激光鞋视觉提示并不能改善PD患者的步态,无论疾病严重程度或FOG状态。需要进一步的调查来检查不同的线索设置或暴露时间。