[ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOLITHOTOMY IN PELVIC KIDNEY].

Harefuah Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Husny Mahmud, Asaf Shvero, Nir Kleinmann, Zohar A Dotan, Dorit E Zilberman
{"title":"[ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOLITHOTOMY IN PELVIC KIDNEY].","authors":"Husny Mahmud, Asaf Shvero, Nir Kleinmann, Zohar A Dotan, Dorit E Zilberman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic kidney is a congenital anomaly whereby the kidney fails to ascend to its normal anatomical location during early embryonic development. This, in turn, makes traditional surgical approaches for renal calculi challenging.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To summarize our experience with robotic-assisted pyelolithotomy (RPPK) for pelvic kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients who underwent RPPK between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Demographic data, stone characteristics (size and density), operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four patients underwent RPPK between 2014 and 2023, three of whom were male. The mean age was 51.2 years (range: 45-54), BMI was 26.6 (22.3-32.2). All patients had a right-sided pelvic kidney. Two patients had previously undergone a failed attempt for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. Stone diameter was 27.7 mm (17-35 mm) and estimated density was 1207.5 HU (905-1500 HU). Mean operative time was 265 minutes (200-323 minutes), while time from incision to closure was 142.2 minutes (95-225 minutes). No ureteral stent or surgical drain were left at the conclusion of the procedures. Upper urinary tract correction was not involved in any of the cases. Blood loss was negligible. The length of hospital stay was 2.2 days. No immediate complications were recorded within one week and one-month post-surgery. Mean follow-up length was 7.5 months (3-13 months).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPPK is safe and effective in the management of pelvic kidney stones. The challenging renal anatomy, as well as stone size and density are not obstacles when it comes to the robotic approach in comparison to other fragmentation methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"164 8","pages":"497-501"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic kidney is a congenital anomaly whereby the kidney fails to ascend to its normal anatomical location during early embryonic development. This, in turn, makes traditional surgical approaches for renal calculi challenging.

Aims: To summarize our experience with robotic-assisted pyelolithotomy (RPPK) for pelvic kidney stones.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent RPPK between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Demographic data, stone characteristics (size and density), operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results: Four patients underwent RPPK between 2014 and 2023, three of whom were male. The mean age was 51.2 years (range: 45-54), BMI was 26.6 (22.3-32.2). All patients had a right-sided pelvic kidney. Two patients had previously undergone a failed attempt for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy. Stone diameter was 27.7 mm (17-35 mm) and estimated density was 1207.5 HU (905-1500 HU). Mean operative time was 265 minutes (200-323 minutes), while time from incision to closure was 142.2 minutes (95-225 minutes). No ureteral stent or surgical drain were left at the conclusion of the procedures. Upper urinary tract correction was not involved in any of the cases. Blood loss was negligible. The length of hospital stay was 2.2 days. No immediate complications were recorded within one week and one-month post-surgery. Mean follow-up length was 7.5 months (3-13 months).

Conclusions: RPPK is safe and effective in the management of pelvic kidney stones. The challenging renal anatomy, as well as stone size and density are not obstacles when it comes to the robotic approach in comparison to other fragmentation methods.

[机器人辅助盆腔肾盂取石术]。
盆腔肾是一种先天性异常,即肾脏在早期胚胎发育期间未能上升到正常的解剖位置。这反过来又使得传统的肾结石手术方法具有挑战性。目的:总结机器人辅助肾盂取石术(RPPK)治疗盆腔肾结石的经验。方法:回顾性分析2014 - 2023年间接受RPPK的患者。收集和分析人口统计学数据、结石特征(大小和密度)、手术细节和术后结果。结果:2014 - 2023年间,4例患者接受了RPPK,其中3例为男性。平均年龄51.2岁(45-54岁),BMI 26.6(22.3-32.2)。所有患者均为右侧盆腔肾。两名患者曾尝试输尿管镜和激光碎石术,但均失败。石头直径27.7 mm (17-35 mm),估计密度为1207.5 HU (905-1500 HU)。平均手术时间265分钟(200 ~ 323分钟),切口至闭合时间142.2分钟(95 ~ 225分钟)。在手术结束时,没有输尿管支架或手术引流留下。所有病例均未涉及上尿路矫正。失血几乎可以忽略不计。住院时间为2.2天。术后1周及1个月内均无即刻并发症发生。平均随访时间7.5个月(3 ~ 13个月)。结论:RPPK治疗盆腔肾结石安全有效。与其他碎裂方法相比,具有挑战性的肾脏解剖结构,以及结石的大小和密度都不是机器人方法的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信