Implications of Linguistic Convergence and Divergence Among Matched and Mixed Autistic and Non-Autistic Communication Partners.

IF 2.2
Morgan Jameson, Allison Bean
{"title":"Implications of Linguistic Convergence and Divergence Among Matched and Mixed Autistic and Non-Autistic Communication Partners.","authors":"Morgan Jameson, Allison Bean","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Linguistic entrainment (i.e., increasing linguistic similarity over time) and its positive social effects are well documented among non-autistic communicators. This study sought to, first, investigate the extent of syntactic and semantic entrainment between communication partners with matched or mixed autism status (i.e., autistic and non-autistic) and, second, explore how entrainment influences rapport development for autistic and non-autistic communicators.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-three autistic adults and 37 non-autistic adults were paired in either a matched or mixed condition. Pair interactions, involving two structured communication tasks (Twenty Questions and tangram identification) via videoconference, were transcribed and analyzed for syntactic and semantic entrainment. Participants also completed a survey about the rapport they experienced in the interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Matched autistic pairs exhibited greater overall syntactic convergence across the full interaction than matched non-autistic pairs, although no significant group differences emerged at the task level. For both autistic and non-autistic participants, greater syntactic convergence was associated with stronger rapport development. For semantic convergence, the results differed: Mixed pairs significantly diverged from each other. In contrast, matched pairs showed no significant change in semantic alignment-neither converging nor diverging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that autistic communicators engage in effective linguistic entrainment through a cumulative alignment process that unfolds over the full interaction rather than within isolated tasks. This study challenges common assumptions about autistic communication based on mixed interactions and highlights the importance of considering matched-autistic communication contexts. It also supports the double empathy theory, which emphasizes mutual understanding between neurotypes, and suggests that autistic communicators possess unique strengths in interpersonal communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"4809-4828"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Linguistic entrainment (i.e., increasing linguistic similarity over time) and its positive social effects are well documented among non-autistic communicators. This study sought to, first, investigate the extent of syntactic and semantic entrainment between communication partners with matched or mixed autism status (i.e., autistic and non-autistic) and, second, explore how entrainment influences rapport development for autistic and non-autistic communicators.

Method: Thirty-three autistic adults and 37 non-autistic adults were paired in either a matched or mixed condition. Pair interactions, involving two structured communication tasks (Twenty Questions and tangram identification) via videoconference, were transcribed and analyzed for syntactic and semantic entrainment. Participants also completed a survey about the rapport they experienced in the interaction.

Results: Matched autistic pairs exhibited greater overall syntactic convergence across the full interaction than matched non-autistic pairs, although no significant group differences emerged at the task level. For both autistic and non-autistic participants, greater syntactic convergence was associated with stronger rapport development. For semantic convergence, the results differed: Mixed pairs significantly diverged from each other. In contrast, matched pairs showed no significant change in semantic alignment-neither converging nor diverging.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that autistic communicators engage in effective linguistic entrainment through a cumulative alignment process that unfolds over the full interaction rather than within isolated tasks. This study challenges common assumptions about autistic communication based on mixed interactions and highlights the importance of considering matched-autistic communication contexts. It also supports the double empathy theory, which emphasizes mutual understanding between neurotypes, and suggests that autistic communicators possess unique strengths in interpersonal communication.

自闭症与非自闭症交际伙伴语言趋同与分化的意义。
目的:语言夹带(即随着时间的推移而增加的语言相似性)及其积极的社会效应在非自闭症交际者中得到了充分的证明。本研究首先探讨了匹配或混合自闭症状态(即自闭症和非自闭症)的交际伙伴之间的句法和语义夹带的程度,其次探讨夹带如何影响自闭症和非自闭症交际者的融洽发展。方法:将33名自闭症成人和37名非自闭症成人分为配对组和混合组。通过视频会议,对涉及两个结构化交流任务(20个问题和七巧板识别)的配对互动进行转录和分析,以进行句法和语义夹带。参与者还完成了一项关于他们在互动中体验到的融洽关系的调查。结果:孤独症配对组比非孤独症配对组在整个互动过程中表现出更大的句法趋同,尽管在任务水平上没有显著的组间差异。对于自闭症和非自闭症参与者来说,更强的句法趋同与更强的关系发展有关。对于语义收敛,结果不同:混合对彼此显著偏离。相比之下,配对组在语义对齐方面没有明显的变化——既不收敛也不发散。结论:研究结果表明,自闭症沟通者通过在整个互动过程中展开的累积对齐过程,而不是在孤立的任务中进行有效的语言卷入。本研究挑战了基于混合互动的自闭症交流的普遍假设,并强调了考虑匹配自闭症交流背景的重要性。这也支持了双重共情理论,该理论强调神经类型之间的相互理解,并表明自闭症传播者在人际沟通方面具有独特的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信