Death scene investigation by medicolegal death investigators: Frequency and associated factors in two US jurisdictions

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Jennifer R. Snippen PhD, S. Marie Harvey PhD, Kimberly K. Repp PhD, Marit L. Bovbjerg PhD
{"title":"Death scene investigation by medicolegal death investigators: Frequency and associated factors in two US jurisdictions","authors":"Jennifer R. Snippen PhD,&nbsp;S. Marie Harvey PhD,&nbsp;Kimberly K. Repp PhD,&nbsp;Marit L. Bovbjerg PhD","doi":"10.1111/1556-4029.70109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scene investigation, a fundamental component of medicolegal death investigation, has not been adequately studied. Using data from an electronic case management system, we analyzed 4509 deaths from two nationally accredited offices, over a 4-year period (2018–2021). We determined the proportion of death scenes directly investigated by medicolegal death investigators (MDIs) and examined factors associated with direct scene investigation. MDIs directly investigated scenes in 76% of the cases in this study, which excluded deaths occurring in medical facilities. Using logistic regression to control for the effects of all variables analyzed, we explored factors that were positively and negatively associated with direct scene investigation. MDIs were most likely to examine scenes when the decedents were young, male, white, the death occurred outdoors, and the circumstances were reported as apparent homicide, suicide, or otherwise “suspicious.” Scenes were less likely to be directly investigated by MDIs if the death was reported in the hours after midnight and originally reported as “natural.” Scene responses differed between the two offices in the study. Overall, these results indicate a need to further explore potential barriers or biases that may impact the consistency and accuracy of medicolegal death investigation. The findings also suggest a need to study operational guidelines or structural constraints that shape individual office practices. This study adds to limited research in the field and contributes information to support development of a more consistent, rigorous national response to this critical public health and public safety function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15743,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic sciences","volume":"70 5","pages":"1882-1891"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.70109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scene investigation, a fundamental component of medicolegal death investigation, has not been adequately studied. Using data from an electronic case management system, we analyzed 4509 deaths from two nationally accredited offices, over a 4-year period (2018–2021). We determined the proportion of death scenes directly investigated by medicolegal death investigators (MDIs) and examined factors associated with direct scene investigation. MDIs directly investigated scenes in 76% of the cases in this study, which excluded deaths occurring in medical facilities. Using logistic regression to control for the effects of all variables analyzed, we explored factors that were positively and negatively associated with direct scene investigation. MDIs were most likely to examine scenes when the decedents were young, male, white, the death occurred outdoors, and the circumstances were reported as apparent homicide, suicide, or otherwise “suspicious.” Scenes were less likely to be directly investigated by MDIs if the death was reported in the hours after midnight and originally reported as “natural.” Scene responses differed between the two offices in the study. Overall, these results indicate a need to further explore potential barriers or biases that may impact the consistency and accuracy of medicolegal death investigation. The findings also suggest a need to study operational guidelines or structural constraints that shape individual office practices. This study adds to limited research in the field and contributes information to support development of a more consistent, rigorous national response to this critical public health and public safety function.

法医死亡调查员的死亡现场调查:两个美国司法管辖区的频率和相关因素。
现场调查是法医死亡调查的基本组成部分,但对现场调查的研究还不够充分。利用电子病例管理系统的数据,我们分析了4年期间(2018-2021年)来自两个国家认可办公室的4509例死亡病例。我们确定了法医死亡调查员(mdi)直接调查的死亡现场的比例,并检查了与直接现场调查相关的因素。在本研究中,MDIs直接调查了76%的病例现场,排除了在医疗设施中发生的死亡。使用逻辑回归来控制所有分析变量的影响,我们探索了与直接现场调查呈正相关和负相关的因素。当死者年轻,男性,白人,死亡发生在户外,并且情况被报告为明显的他杀,自杀或其他“可疑”时,mdi最有可能检查现场。如果死亡是在午夜之后的几个小时内报告的,并且最初报告为“自然死亡”,那么mdi就不太可能直接调查现场。在这项研究中,两个办公室的现场反应有所不同。总的来说,这些结果表明需要进一步探索可能影响法医死亡调查一致性和准确性的潜在障碍或偏见。调查结果还表明,有必要研究影响个人办公室做法的操作指南或结构限制。这项研究补充了该领域有限的研究,并提供了信息,以支持对这一重要的公共卫生和公共安全职能制定更一致、更严格的国家应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of forensic sciences
Journal of forensic sciences 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic Sciences (JFS) is the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). It is devoted to the publication of original investigations, observations, scholarly inquiries and reviews in various branches of the forensic sciences. These include anthropology, criminalistics, digital and multimedia sciences, engineering and applied sciences, pathology/biology, psychiatry and behavioral science, jurisprudence, odontology, questioned documents, and toxicology. Similar submissions dealing with forensic aspects of other sciences and the social sciences are also accepted, as are submissions dealing with scientifically sound emerging science disciplines. The content and/or views expressed in the JFS are not necessarily those of the AAFS, the JFS Editorial Board, the organizations with which authors are affiliated, or the publisher of JFS. All manuscript submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信