Angela G Opsahl, Katie Ruth Busby, Amy Minix, Deanna L Reising, Janet S Fulton, Amy Hagedorn Wonder
{"title":"Mentoring Programs in Nursing Academia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Angela G Opsahl, Katie Ruth Busby, Amy Minix, Deanna L Reising, Janet S Fulton, Amy Hagedorn Wonder","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faculty mentoring initiatives have focused on supporting tenure-track faculty in conducting research. Little is known about structures and processes for administering or evaluating mentoring programs for the successful transition of new nursing faculty to the full scope of the academic faculty role.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review was conducted to examine nurse faculty mentoring programs and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley Framework served as a guiding framework to describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of nursing faculty mentoring programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight studies were included in this review. Content areas were categorized as mentoring program models, evaluation of mentoring programs, and mentoring program outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic mentoring programs are increasing in number and scope indicating the growing importance of mentoring. Significant gaps remain in outcome measurement, impact on faculty serving as mentors, and return-on-investment calculations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Faculty mentoring initiatives have focused on supporting tenure-track faculty in conducting research. Little is known about structures and processes for administering or evaluating mentoring programs for the successful transition of new nursing faculty to the full scope of the academic faculty role.
Purpose: This scoping review was conducted to examine nurse faculty mentoring programs and associated outcomes.
Method: The Arksey and O'Malley Framework served as a guiding framework to describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of nursing faculty mentoring programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia.
Results: Sixty-eight studies were included in this review. Content areas were categorized as mentoring program models, evaluation of mentoring programs, and mentoring program outcomes.
Conclusion: Academic mentoring programs are increasing in number and scope indicating the growing importance of mentoring. Significant gaps remain in outcome measurement, impact on faculty serving as mentors, and return-on-investment calculations.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.