Mentoring Programs in Nursing Academia: A Scoping Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Angela G Opsahl, Katie Ruth Busby, Amy Minix, Deanna L Reising, Janet S Fulton, Amy Hagedorn Wonder
{"title":"Mentoring Programs in Nursing Academia: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Angela G Opsahl, Katie Ruth Busby, Amy Minix, Deanna L Reising, Janet S Fulton, Amy Hagedorn Wonder","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Faculty mentoring initiatives have focused on supporting tenure-track faculty in conducting research. Little is known about structures and processes for administering or evaluating mentoring programs for the successful transition of new nursing faculty to the full scope of the academic faculty role.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This scoping review was conducted to examine nurse faculty mentoring programs and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley Framework served as a guiding framework to describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of nursing faculty mentoring programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight studies were included in this review. Content areas were categorized as mentoring program models, evaluation of mentoring programs, and mentoring program outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic mentoring programs are increasing in number and scope indicating the growing importance of mentoring. Significant gaps remain in outcome measurement, impact on faculty serving as mentors, and return-on-investment calculations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001984","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Faculty mentoring initiatives have focused on supporting tenure-track faculty in conducting research. Little is known about structures and processes for administering or evaluating mentoring programs for the successful transition of new nursing faculty to the full scope of the academic faculty role.

Purpose: This scoping review was conducted to examine nurse faculty mentoring programs and associated outcomes.

Method: The Arksey and O'Malley Framework served as a guiding framework to describe the structure, processes, and outcomes of nursing faculty mentoring programs in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

Results: Sixty-eight studies were included in this review. Content areas were categorized as mentoring program models, evaluation of mentoring programs, and mentoring program outcomes.

Conclusion: Academic mentoring programs are increasing in number and scope indicating the growing importance of mentoring. Significant gaps remain in outcome measurement, impact on faculty serving as mentors, and return-on-investment calculations.

护理学术界的指导计划:范围审查。
背景:教师指导计划的重点是支持终身教职教师进行研究。对于管理或评估指导计划的结构和过程,对于新护理教师成功过渡到学术教师角色的全部范围,知之甚少。目的:本综述旨在检查护士教师指导计划及其相关结果。方法:Arksey和O'Malley框架作为一个指导框架来描述美国、加拿大和澳大利亚护理教师指导计划的结构、过程和结果。结果:本综述纳入了68项研究。内容领域被分类为指导计划模型、指导计划的评估和指导计划的结果。结论:学术指导项目在数量和范围上都在增加,这表明指导的重要性越来越大。在结果衡量、对作为导师的教师的影响以及投资回报率计算方面仍存在重大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信