Michal Schäfer, Brian Mitzman, Courtney L. Scaife, Jessica Magarinos, Satvik Ramakrishna, Ethan Tumarkin, Bryce Hill, Thomas K. Varghese Jr, Nicolas Contreras
{"title":"Pre-Operative Reduced Atrial Compliance Is Predictive of Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy","authors":"Michal Schäfer, Brian Mitzman, Courtney L. Scaife, Jessica Magarinos, Satvik Ramakrishna, Ethan Tumarkin, Bryce Hill, Thomas K. Varghese Jr, Nicolas Contreras","doi":"10.1111/echo.70298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There are no established predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in patients undergoing esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine whether pre-operative bi-atrial strain might predict POAF in patients undergoing esophageal resection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent esophagectomy and had preoperative echocardiography underwent comprehensive myocardial strain analysis measuring left and right atrial (LA and RA) phase-specific strain and left and right global longitudinal strain (LV and RV GLS). Clinical and traditional variables were sampled and considered for multivariable models with the POAF serving as a primary outcome of the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-nine patients constituted the study group and the incidence of POAF was 25.4% (<i>N</i> = 15). Patients who developed POAF were older and had a higher rate of anastomotic leak. LA strain analysis was overall suggestive of reduced LA compliance in the POAF group with decreased LA reservoir strain (33.9 ± 8.9 vs. 22.0 ± 8.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LA conduit strain (−18.4 ± 9.2 vs. −9.6 ± 5.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). RA reservoir strain was also reduced in the POAF group (36.9 ± 8 vs. 29.6 ± 8.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) together with reduced RA conduit strain (−20.6 ± 6.9 vs. −15.4 ± 7.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.042). LV GLS was decreased in patients with POAF (−16.2 ± 3.5 vs. −12.3 ± 7.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.036), along with RV GLS (−17.6 ± 3.4 vs. −14.4 ± 3.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.009). Reduced LA reservoir strain remained an independent predictor for POAF when combined with the presence of an anastomotic leak [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92), <i>p</i> < 0.001] yielding model with AUC of 0.86 with a sensitivity 60.0% and specificity 90.1%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Reduced bi-atrial compliance evidenced by standard echocardiographic strain analysis predicts POAF in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation should be considered in surgical candidates before esophageal surgery, given the detected subclinical global myocardial dysfunction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50558,"journal":{"name":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","volume":"42 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/echo.70298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There are no established predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in patients undergoing esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine whether pre-operative bi-atrial strain might predict POAF in patients undergoing esophageal resection.
Methods
Patients who underwent esophagectomy and had preoperative echocardiography underwent comprehensive myocardial strain analysis measuring left and right atrial (LA and RA) phase-specific strain and left and right global longitudinal strain (LV and RV GLS). Clinical and traditional variables were sampled and considered for multivariable models with the POAF serving as a primary outcome of the study.
Results
Fifty-nine patients constituted the study group and the incidence of POAF was 25.4% (N = 15). Patients who developed POAF were older and had a higher rate of anastomotic leak. LA strain analysis was overall suggestive of reduced LA compliance in the POAF group with decreased LA reservoir strain (33.9 ± 8.9 vs. 22.0 ± 8.8%, p < 0.001) and LA conduit strain (−18.4 ± 9.2 vs. −9.6 ± 5.5%, p < 0.001). RA reservoir strain was also reduced in the POAF group (36.9 ± 8 vs. 29.6 ± 8.1%, p = 0.006) together with reduced RA conduit strain (−20.6 ± 6.9 vs. −15.4 ± 7.6%, p = 0.042). LV GLS was decreased in patients with POAF (−16.2 ± 3.5 vs. −12.3 ± 7.5%, p = 0.036), along with RV GLS (−17.6 ± 3.4 vs. −14.4 ± 3.8%, p = 0.009). Reduced LA reservoir strain remained an independent predictor for POAF when combined with the presence of an anastomotic leak [OR: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92), p < 0.001] yielding model with AUC of 0.86 with a sensitivity 60.0% and specificity 90.1%.
Conclusion
Reduced bi-atrial compliance evidenced by standard echocardiographic strain analysis predicts POAF in patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation should be considered in surgical candidates before esophageal surgery, given the detected subclinical global myocardial dysfunction.
期刊介绍:
Echocardiography: A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques is the official publication of the International Society of Cardiovascular Ultrasound. Widely recognized for its comprehensive peer-reviewed articles, case studies, original research, and reviews by international authors. Echocardiography keeps its readership of echocardiographers, ultrasound specialists, and cardiologists well informed of the latest developments in the field.