Persistent Challenges in Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescriptions: Time to Optimize Medication Safety in Hospital and Community Settings.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Majdi Masarwi, Hely Bassalov, Maya Koren-Michowitz, Sofia Berkovitch, Dorit Blickstein
{"title":"Persistent Challenges in Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescriptions: Time to Optimize Medication Safety in Hospital and Community Settings.","authors":"Majdi Masarwi, Hely Bassalov, Maya Koren-Michowitz, Sofia Berkovitch, Dorit Blickstein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly transformed anticoagulant therapy, improving effectiveness, safety, and convenience in managing thromboembolic conditions. However, concerns persist regarding drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with DOACs, necessitating the establishment of multidisciplinary antithrombotic stewardship programs to optimize the selection, dosing, and monitoring of DOACs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the incidence and types of DRPs associated with DOACs, the frequency of clinical pharmacist consultations, the acceptance rates of the clinical pharmacist recommendations, and physicians' adherence to appropriate DOACs prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 4 months in the internal medicine departments at Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Israel. The study included patients aged 18 years and older who were prescribed DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran). Data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. A clinical pharmacist reviewed and reassessed the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 415 patients receiving DOACs were identified. Among them, 28.4% had inappropriate DOAC prescriptions leading to 128 recommended interventions. The most common DRP was underdosing (29.7%) followed by unjustified antiplatelet use (26.6%). Clinical pharmacists performed 85.9% of the interventions, with a physician acceptance rate of 72.7%. Patients with inappropriate DOAC prescriptions exhibited increased trends in thromboembolic events and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite over a decade of clinical experience with DOACs, DRPs remain a significant challenge. Implementing antithrombotic stewardship programs is critical for optimizing DOACs use, reducing DRPs, and enhancing patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"27 9","pages":"577-582"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have significantly transformed anticoagulant therapy, improving effectiveness, safety, and convenience in managing thromboembolic conditions. However, concerns persist regarding drug-related problems (DRPs) associated with DOACs, necessitating the establishment of multidisciplinary antithrombotic stewardship programs to optimize the selection, dosing, and monitoring of DOACs.

Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and types of DRPs associated with DOACs, the frequency of clinical pharmacist consultations, the acceptance rates of the clinical pharmacist recommendations, and physicians' adherence to appropriate DOACs prescribing practices.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 4 months in the internal medicine departments at Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Israel. The study included patients aged 18 years and older who were prescribed DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran). Data on patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected from electronic medical records. A clinical pharmacist reviewed and reassessed the appropriateness of DOAC prescribing.

Results: During the study period, 415 patients receiving DOACs were identified. Among them, 28.4% had inappropriate DOAC prescriptions leading to 128 recommended interventions. The most common DRP was underdosing (29.7%) followed by unjustified antiplatelet use (26.6%). Clinical pharmacists performed 85.9% of the interventions, with a physician acceptance rate of 72.7%. Patients with inappropriate DOAC prescriptions exhibited increased trends in thromboembolic events and in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: Despite over a decade of clinical experience with DOACs, DRPs remain a significant challenge. Implementing antithrombotic stewardship programs is critical for optimizing DOACs use, reducing DRPs, and enhancing patient safety.

直接口服抗凝处方的持续挑战:优化医院和社区用药安全的时机。
背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)显著改变了抗凝治疗,提高了治疗血栓栓塞性疾病的有效性、安全性和便利性。然而,与doac相关的药物相关问题(DRPs)仍然存在,需要建立多学科抗血栓管理计划,以优化doac的选择、剂量和监测。目的:评估与DOACs相关的drp的发生率和类型、临床药师咨询的频率、临床药师推荐的接受率以及医生对适当的DOACs处方实践的依从性。方法:回顾性队列研究在以色列沙米尔医疗中心(Assaf Harofeh)内科进行了超过4个月的研究。该研究包括18岁及以上的患者,他们服用了doac(阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群)。从电子病历中收集患者特征和临床结果的数据。临床药师审查并重新评估DOAC处方的适当性。结果:在研究期间,确定了415例接受doac的患者。其中28.4%的患者DOAC处方不当,导致推荐干预措施128项。最常见的DRP是剂量不足(29.7%),其次是不合理的抗血小板使用(26.6%)。临床药师干预率为85.9%,医师接受率为72.7%。服用不当DOAC处方的患者血栓栓塞事件和住院死亡率呈增加趋势。结论:尽管有超过十年的DOACs临床经验,DRPs仍然是一个重大挑战。实施抗血栓管理项目对于优化DOACs的使用、降低DRPs和提高患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信