Plug-based vascular closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Carlo Briguori, Luca Paolucci, Mario Scarpelli, Antonietta Di Iorio, Valeria Cavaliere, Amelia Focaccio, Francesca De Micco, Daniele Maselli
{"title":"Plug-based vascular closure device in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.","authors":"Carlo Briguori, Luca Paolucci, Mario Scarpelli, Antonietta Di Iorio, Valeria Cavaliere, Amelia Focaccio, Francesca De Micco, Daniele Maselli","doi":"10.25270/jic/25.00181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Failure of vascular closure device (VCD) is the most common cause of access-site vascular complications in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The authors sought to determine if the systematic use of arteriotomy-site ballooning with concomitant manual compression following the delivery of a plug-based VCD (MANTA, Teleflex) can optimize toggle-plug assembly apposition to the common femoral artery (CFA) wall and improve the final hemostatic efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational, single-center study, 323 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI from October 2021 to December 2024 underwent access closure with the MANTA VCD. The primary endpoints were VCD failure rate, predictors of VCD failure, and access-site and access-related major and minor vascular complications, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 definition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VCD failure occurred in 12 (3.7%) patients (Failure group). The independent predictors of failure were minimum CFA diameter and patient risk as assessed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed CFA minimum diameter with an area under the curve of 0.77 (0.69-0.86, P less than .001); the best cutoff was 6.30 mm (sensitivity 83%; specificity 59%; positive predictive value 7%; negative predictive value 99%). Access-site vascular complications occurred in 21 (6.5%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The systematic use of arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression following MANTA VCD delivery should be considered to improve the final hemostatic efficacy. This device should be avoided when dealing with small (less than 6.3 mm) CFA diameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/25.00181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Failure of vascular closure device (VCD) is the most common cause of access-site vascular complications in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The authors sought to determine if the systematic use of arteriotomy-site ballooning with concomitant manual compression following the delivery of a plug-based VCD (MANTA, Teleflex) can optimize toggle-plug assembly apposition to the common femoral artery (CFA) wall and improve the final hemostatic efficacy.

Methods: In this prospective, observational, single-center study, 323 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI from October 2021 to December 2024 underwent access closure with the MANTA VCD. The primary endpoints were VCD failure rate, predictors of VCD failure, and access-site and access-related major and minor vascular complications, according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 definition.

Results: VCD failure occurred in 12 (3.7%) patients (Failure group). The independent predictors of failure were minimum CFA diameter and patient risk as assessed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed CFA minimum diameter with an area under the curve of 0.77 (0.69-0.86, P less than .001); the best cutoff was 6.30 mm (sensitivity 83%; specificity 59%; positive predictive value 7%; negative predictive value 99%). Access-site vascular complications occurred in 21 (6.5%) patients.

Conclusions: The systematic use of arteriotomy-site ballooning plus concomitant manual compression following MANTA VCD delivery should be considered to improve the final hemostatic efficacy. This device should be avoided when dealing with small (less than 6.3 mm) CFA diameters.

经股主动脉瓣置入术中导管塞式血管关闭装置的应用。
目的:血管关闭装置(VCD)失效是经股主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中通路血管并发症最常见的原因。作者试图确定是否系统地使用动脉切开术部位球囊术,并在送出塞为基础的VCD (MANTA, Teleflex)后同时进行手动压缩,可以优化开关塞组件与股总动脉(CFA)壁的贴合,并提高最终的止血效果。方法:在这项前瞻性、观察性、单中心研究中,从2021年10月至2024年12月,323例连续接受经股TAVI的患者使用MANTA VCD关闭通道。根据瓣膜学术研究联盟-3的定义,主要终点是VCD失败率、VCD失败的预测因素、通路部位和与通路相关的主要和次要血管并发症。结果:VCD失效组12例(3.7%)。失败的独立预测因子是最小CFA直径和胸外科学会预测死亡风险评分评估的患者风险。受试者工作特征分析显示,CFA最小直径曲线下面积为0.77 (0.69 ~ 0.86,P < 0.001);最佳临界值为6.30 mm(敏感性83%,特异性59%,阳性预测值7%,阴性预测值99%)。21例(6.5%)患者出现通路部位血管并发症。结论:在MANTA VCD输注后,应考虑系统地采用动脉切开术部位球囊术并同时进行手动加压,以提高最终止血效果。当处理较小(小于6.3 mm)的CFA直径时,应避免使用该设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信