Understanding Primary Care Providers' Attitudes and Practices for Hearing Loss Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Natalie P Snyder, Madison Caspari, Jena Patel, Irina Middleton
{"title":"Understanding Primary Care Providers' Attitudes and Practices for Hearing Loss Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.","authors":"Natalie P Snyder, Madison Caspari, Jena Patel, Irina Middleton","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Behind arthritis and heart disease, hearing loss (HL) is the third most prevalent chronic condition in older Americans, with primary care providers playing a crucial role in its identification. Understanding the practices and perceptions of primary care providers in hearing health is key to understanding gaps in hearing health care for patients.<b>Methods:</b> We conducted a quality improvement study at an urban tertiary academic facility from January&#8211;June 2024. Primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were surveyed on attitudes and practices regarding HL screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns and trends.<b>Results:</b> Of 695 subjects queried, there were 62 respondents (response rate: 8.9 percent), most aged 41&#8211;55&#8201;years (n &#61; 27, 43.5 percent). Many respondents reported they did not routinely screen patients for HL (n &#61; 36, 59 percent), with lack of time being the most cited factor (n &#61; 22, 62.9 percent). Some respondents indicated they followed Medicare guidelines for HL screening (n &#61; 8, 32 percent), though the majority indicated they did not use specific guidelines (n &#61; 15, 60 percent). Many providers reported they did not feel comfortable in their knowledge about hearing aids (n &#61; 39, 62.9 percent) or cochlear implants (n &#61; 51, 82.3 percent); in fact, 62.9 percent of the cohort reported they had never been educated about cochlear implants.<b>Conclusions:</b> These responses identify potential gaps in the hearing health care pipeline, particularly the need for standardized HL screening protocols and increased interprofessional training and education on HL treatments. Future endeavors to target these gaps should be assessed to see whether these gaps can be closed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behind arthritis and heart disease, hearing loss (HL) is the third most prevalent chronic condition in older Americans, with primary care providers playing a crucial role in its identification. Understanding the practices and perceptions of primary care providers in hearing health is key to understanding gaps in hearing health care for patients.Methods: We conducted a quality improvement study at an urban tertiary academic facility from January–June 2024. Primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were surveyed on attitudes and practices regarding HL screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify patterns and trends.Results: Of 695 subjects queried, there were 62 respondents (response rate: 8.9 percent), most aged 41–55 years (n = 27, 43.5 percent). Many respondents reported they did not routinely screen patients for HL (n = 36, 59 percent), with lack of time being the most cited factor (n = 22, 62.9 percent). Some respondents indicated they followed Medicare guidelines for HL screening (n = 8, 32 percent), though the majority indicated they did not use specific guidelines (n = 15, 60 percent). Many providers reported they did not feel comfortable in their knowledge about hearing aids (n = 39, 62.9 percent) or cochlear implants (n = 51, 82.3 percent); in fact, 62.9 percent of the cohort reported they had never been educated about cochlear implants.Conclusions: These responses identify potential gaps in the hearing health care pipeline, particularly the need for standardized HL screening protocols and increased interprofessional training and education on HL treatments. Future endeavors to target these gaps should be assessed to see whether these gaps can be closed.

了解初级保健提供者对听力损失筛查、诊断和治疗的态度和做法。
背景:听力损失(HL)是美国老年人中仅次于关节炎和心脏病的第三大常见慢性疾病,初级保健提供者在其识别中起着至关重要的作用。了解初级保健提供者在听力卫生方面的做法和看法是了解患者听力卫生保健差距的关键。方法:我们于2024年1月–;6月在一所城市高等教育机构进行了一项质量改进研究。调查了初级保健医生、执业护士和医师助理对HL筛查、诊断和治疗的态度和做法。使用描述性统计分析数据以确定模式和趋势。结果:在695名被调查者中,有62名被调查者(回复率:8.9%),大多数是41–;55 ;岁(n = 27, 43.5%)。许多受访者报告说,他们没有常规地对患者进行HL筛查(n = 36,59%),缺乏时间是被引用最多的因素(n = 22,62.9%)。一些受访者表示,他们遵循了HL筛查的医疗保险指南(n = 8.32%),尽管大多数人表示他们没有使用特定的指南(n = 15.60%)。许多医疗服务提供者报告说,他们对助听器(n = 39, 62.9%)或人工耳蜗(n = 51, 82.3%)的知识感到不放心;事实上,62.9%的队列报告说他们从未接受过有关人工耳蜗植入的教育。结论:这些反应确定了听力保健管道中的潜在差距,特别是需要标准化的HL筛查方案和增加HL治疗的跨专业培训和教育。应该评估未来针对这些差距的努力,看看这些差距是否可以缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信