Accelerating patient transitions from hospital to home in the United Kingdom with single-use negative pressure wound therapy: a discharge pathway.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mark J Portou, Ashley W Collinsworth, Siobhan Lookess
{"title":"Accelerating patient transitions from hospital to home in the United Kingdom with single-use negative pressure wound therapy: a discharge pathway.","authors":"Mark J Portou, Ashley W Collinsworth, Siobhan Lookess","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Initially limited to inpatient use, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is now frequently used in community settings. However, complexities in wound management step-down strategies in the United Kingdom, including regional variations in referral processes, lack of consensus on funding criteria, and limited availability of NPWT units, have led to extended hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients ready for discharge but still needing NPWT. Single-use NPWT (sNPWT) can serve as a bridge between hospital and community NPWT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and potential cost savings of the implementation of a discharge pathway utilizing sNPWT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series included 5 patients with open lower limb wounds treated at a National Health Service facility using an sNPWT discharge pathway. Wounds were assessed before and after sNPWT use. Differences in average inpatient LOS and costs were calculated and compared with those for patients who remained hospitalized until community NPWT was available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sNPWT discharge pathway was well tolerated by patients and resulted in good clinical outcomes. Patients discharged on sNPWT had an average reduction in LOS of 20.2 days, resulting in a projected £12 350 savings in hospital costs per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preliminary findings indicate use of an sNPWT discharge pathway is feasible and may result in reduced LOS and associated costs while improving patient care. Additional studies are needed to understand the effect on wound management, patient outcomes, and overall care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 8","pages":"305-313"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Initially limited to inpatient use, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is now frequently used in community settings. However, complexities in wound management step-down strategies in the United Kingdom, including regional variations in referral processes, lack of consensus on funding criteria, and limited availability of NPWT units, have led to extended hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients ready for discharge but still needing NPWT. Single-use NPWT (sNPWT) can serve as a bridge between hospital and community NPWT.

Objective: To assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and potential cost savings of the implementation of a discharge pathway utilizing sNPWT.

Methods: This case series included 5 patients with open lower limb wounds treated at a National Health Service facility using an sNPWT discharge pathway. Wounds were assessed before and after sNPWT use. Differences in average inpatient LOS and costs were calculated and compared with those for patients who remained hospitalized until community NPWT was available.

Results: The sNPWT discharge pathway was well tolerated by patients and resulted in good clinical outcomes. Patients discharged on sNPWT had an average reduction in LOS of 20.2 days, resulting in a projected £12 350 savings in hospital costs per patient.

Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate use of an sNPWT discharge pathway is feasible and may result in reduced LOS and associated costs while improving patient care. Additional studies are needed to understand the effect on wound management, patient outcomes, and overall care costs.

在英国使用一次性负压伤口治疗加速患者从医院到家庭的过渡:一种出院途径
背景:负压伤口治疗(NPWT)最初仅限于住院患者使用,现在在社区环境中经常使用。然而,英国伤口管理逐步减少策略的复杂性,包括转诊流程的地区差异,对资金标准缺乏共识,以及NPWT单位的有限可用性,导致准备出院但仍需要NPWT的患者住院时间延长(LOS)。一次性NPWT可作为医院和社区NPWT之间的桥梁。目的:评估利用sNPWT实施排放通道的可行性、有效性和潜在的成本节约。方法:本病例系列包括5例在国家卫生服务机构使用sNPWT出院通道治疗的开放性下肢伤口患者。在sNPWT使用前后对伤口进行评估。计算住院患者平均LOS和费用的差异,并将其与在社区NPWT可用之前一直住院的患者进行比较。结果:患者对sNPWT排出途径耐受良好,临床效果良好。采用sNPWT出院的患者平均减少了20.2天的住院时间,预计每位患者可节省12 350英镑的医院费用。结论:初步研究结果表明,使用sNPWT排放通道是可行的,可以降低LOS和相关费用,同时改善患者护理。需要进一步的研究来了解对伤口管理、患者预后和总体护理成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信