Do elevated intrarenal pressures during mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy increase postoperative pain??

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ziv Savin, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Yuval Elkun, Eve Frangopoulos, Raymond Khargi, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"Do elevated intrarenal pressures during mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy increase postoperative pain??","authors":"Ziv Savin, Kavita Gupta, Christopher Connors, Yuval Elkun, Eve Frangopoulos, Raymond Khargi, Vinay Durbhakula, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High intrarenal pressures (IRP) during mini-PCNL have been postulated to result in increased postoperative pain but no studies have evaluated this to our knowledge. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between IRP and immediate postoperative pain when using different tract sizes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were enrolled and assigned for standard (s-PCNL, 24fr), suctioning-mini (sm-PCNL, 16fr) and non-suctioning-mini (nsm-PCNL, 17.5fr) PCNLs. IRP was measured continuously with a novel technique of real-time monitoring using a 0.014 single-use pressure-sensing COMET™ guidewire. Postoperative pain was documented at the PACU using the VAS pain score. Correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between maximal IRP or tract size and postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 30 patients with 10 patients in each group. The median age was 59 and the median stone volume was 438 mm<sup>3</sup>. None of the patients were pre-stented. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the groups. The median average IRP of the entire cohort was 7 mmHg (IQR 5-11), and the median maximal pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR 30-66). There were no IRP differences between the groups (p = 0.67 for average; p = 0.35 for maximal). Average and maximal VAS pain scores were not different between the tract size groups (p = 0.09 and p = 0.17, respectively), and no significant association was found between maximal IRP and pain scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IRP range during PCNL is relatively low, regardless of the tract size. There was no association between the level of maximal IRP and postoperative pain. Our findings provide new in-vivo evidence challenging the commonly cited 30 mmHg IRP threshold and support its reevaluation, given the lack of strong clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01849-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High intrarenal pressures (IRP) during mini-PCNL have been postulated to result in increased postoperative pain but no studies have evaluated this to our knowledge. We sought to determine if there is a correlation between IRP and immediate postoperative pain when using different tract sizes.

Methods: Patients were enrolled and assigned for standard (s-PCNL, 24fr), suctioning-mini (sm-PCNL, 16fr) and non-suctioning-mini (nsm-PCNL, 17.5fr) PCNLs. IRP was measured continuously with a novel technique of real-time monitoring using a 0.014 single-use pressure-sensing COMET™ guidewire. Postoperative pain was documented at the PACU using the VAS pain score. Correlation tests were used to evaluate the association between maximal IRP or tract size and postoperative pain.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 30 patients with 10 patients in each group. The median age was 59 and the median stone volume was 438 mm3. None of the patients were pre-stented. Baseline characteristics were comparable across the groups. The median average IRP of the entire cohort was 7 mmHg (IQR 5-11), and the median maximal pressure was 50 mmHg (IQR 30-66). There were no IRP differences between the groups (p = 0.67 for average; p = 0.35 for maximal). Average and maximal VAS pain scores were not different between the tract size groups (p = 0.09 and p = 0.17, respectively), and no significant association was found between maximal IRP and pain scores.

Conclusion: The IRP range during PCNL is relatively low, regardless of the tract size. There was no association between the level of maximal IRP and postoperative pain. Our findings provide new in-vivo evidence challenging the commonly cited 30 mmHg IRP threshold and support its reevaluation, given the lack of strong clinical validation.

经皮肾镜取石术中肾内压升高会增加术后疼痛吗?
导言:迷你pcnl期间高肾内压(IRP)被认为会导致术后疼痛增加,但据我们所知尚未有研究对此进行评估。我们试图确定当使用不同的肠道大小时,IRP与术后即刻疼痛之间是否存在相关性。方法:将患者分为标准型(s-PCNL, 24例)、抽吸型(sm-PCNL, 16例)和非抽吸型(nsm-PCNL, 17.5例)pcnl。采用新颖的实时监测技术,使用0.014一次性压力传感COMET™导丝连续测量IRP。术后疼痛在PACU用VAS疼痛评分记录。相关检验用于评估最大IRP或肠道大小与术后疼痛之间的关系。结果:研究队列共30例患者,每组10例。中位年龄为59岁,中位结石体积为438 mm3。所有患者均未接受支架植入。各组的基线特征具有可比性。整个队列的中位平均IRP为7 mmHg (IQR 5-11),中位最大压力为50 mmHg (IQR 30-66)。两组间IRP无差异(平均p = 0.67,最大p = 0.35)。平均和最大VAS疼痛评分在两组间无差异(分别为p = 0.09和p = 0.17),最大IRP与疼痛评分之间无显著关联。结论:PCNL的IRP范围相对较低,与尿道大小无关。最大IRP水平与术后疼痛无相关性。我们的研究结果提供了新的体内证据,挑战了通常被引用的30 mmHg IRP阈值,并支持其重新评估,因为缺乏强有力的临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信