Wheat Maintains Stem Water Potential During Drought Stress Despite Declining Osmotic Potential.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Sarah Verbeke, Carmen María Padilla-Díaz, Sarah Lievens, Helena Faveere, Stan Goethals, Zoë Vandekerckhove, Kim Vandewoestijne, Kathy Steppe
{"title":"Wheat Maintains Stem Water Potential During Drought Stress Despite Declining Osmotic Potential.","authors":"Sarah Verbeke, Carmen María Padilla-Díaz, Sarah Lievens, Helena Faveere, Stan Goethals, Zoë Vandekerckhove, Kim Vandewoestijne, Kathy Steppe","doi":"10.1111/ppl.70513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant water potential is one of the most frequently measured variables of plant water status. Stem water potential, often approximated by wrapping the leaves, is assumed to be more stable and a better measure of drought stress than leaf water potential. In wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the stems cannot be seen as merely water transporting organs; rather, they store high amounts of osmotically active carbohydrates, which are postulated to affect water uptake and storage. This study compared the true stem water potential with the wrapped leaf water potential. One drought-sensitive cultivar (Viking) and two resistant cultivars (Impala and Servus) were subjected to different levels of drought stress. Osmotic potential and water content were also measured to study and compare the hydraulic responses to drought stress in the different cultivars. We found that the wrapped leaf water potential does not match the stem water potential in wheat. Instead, wheat maintains its stem water potential during drought stress. Despite the low osmotic potential in the stem parenchyma, the water potential in the stem xylem did not decline as drought stress progressed. This paradox can be explained by recent findings that not only water potential-driven flow, but also turgor-driven flow occurs in wheat stems. This hypothesis suggests that the carbohydrates in stem parenchyma induce an influx of water, but that this water is transported back out under a hydrostatic gradient, redirecting the water to the developing ear.</p>","PeriodicalId":20164,"journal":{"name":"Physiologia plantarum","volume":"177 5","pages":"e70513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiologia plantarum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.70513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant water potential is one of the most frequently measured variables of plant water status. Stem water potential, often approximated by wrapping the leaves, is assumed to be more stable and a better measure of drought stress than leaf water potential. In wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), the stems cannot be seen as merely water transporting organs; rather, they store high amounts of osmotically active carbohydrates, which are postulated to affect water uptake and storage. This study compared the true stem water potential with the wrapped leaf water potential. One drought-sensitive cultivar (Viking) and two resistant cultivars (Impala and Servus) were subjected to different levels of drought stress. Osmotic potential and water content were also measured to study and compare the hydraulic responses to drought stress in the different cultivars. We found that the wrapped leaf water potential does not match the stem water potential in wheat. Instead, wheat maintains its stem water potential during drought stress. Despite the low osmotic potential in the stem parenchyma, the water potential in the stem xylem did not decline as drought stress progressed. This paradox can be explained by recent findings that not only water potential-driven flow, but also turgor-driven flow occurs in wheat stems. This hypothesis suggests that the carbohydrates in stem parenchyma induce an influx of water, but that this water is transported back out under a hydrostatic gradient, redirecting the water to the developing ear.

干旱胁迫下小麦在渗透势下降的情况下保持茎秆水势。
植物水势是植物水分状态最常用的测量变量之一。茎水势,通常通过包裹叶片来近似,被认为比叶片水势更稳定,是干旱胁迫的更好衡量标准。在小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)中,茎不能仅仅被看作是输水器官;相反,它们储存了大量的渗透活性碳水化合物,这被认为会影响水的吸收和储存。本研究比较了茎真水势和包裹叶水势。1个干旱敏感品种(Viking)和2个抗性品种(Impala和Servus)受到不同程度的干旱胁迫。通过测定渗透势和水分含量来研究和比较不同品种对干旱胁迫的水力响应。结果表明,小麦叶片缠绕水势与茎部水势不匹配。相反,小麦在干旱胁迫下保持茎秆水势。尽管茎薄壁组织的渗透势较低,但随着干旱胁迫的加剧,茎木质部的水势没有下降。这一悖论可以用最近的研究结果来解释,即小麦茎中不仅存在水势驱动的流动,而且存在膨润驱动的流动。这一假说表明,茎实质中的碳水化合物诱导了水的流入,但这些水在流体静力梯度的作用下被运回,重新定向到发育中的穗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiologia plantarum
Physiologia plantarum 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: Physiologia Plantarum is an international journal committed to publishing the best full-length original research papers that advance our understanding of primary mechanisms of plant development, growth and productivity as well as plant interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment. All organisational levels of experimental plant biology – from molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics to ecophysiology and global change biology – fall within the scope of the journal. The content is distributed between 5 main subject areas supervised by Subject Editors specialised in the respective domain: (1) biochemistry and metabolism, (2) ecophysiology, stress and adaptation, (3) uptake, transport and assimilation, (4) development, growth and differentiation, (5) photobiology and photosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信