Wei Bingting, Yang Chen, Ma Wei, Xie Mingjing, Xiong Yang, Wu Tingting, Zhang Xuebing
{"title":"Use of a novel zipper device for wound closure of cutaneous abscesses in pediatric outpatients: a case series.","authors":"Wei Bingting, Yang Chen, Ma Wei, Xie Mingjing, Xiong Yang, Wu Tingting, Zhang Xuebing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current management of pediatric cutaneous abscesses involves either spontaneous healing by secondary intention or suturing through tertiary intention, which are often lengthy processes that cause discomfort and distress among children. As it is noninvasive and simple, a novel zipper device is widely used for the primary wound closure of surgical incisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the effectiveness of novel zipper device use for pediatric cutaneous abscess wound closure in an outpatient context.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 26 pediatric outpatients with simple cutaneous abscesses were included. After incision and drainage (I and D), the novel zipper device was applied once pus decreased significantly and fresh granulation tissue emerged. Wound healing time and pain score were tracked over the intervention period. Linear regression and restricted cubic spline models were also used to analyze the relationship between the intervention interval of time from I and D to zipper application and wound healing time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average (SD) wound healing time was 12.73 (3.16) days. Pain scores decreased significantly from a median of 2 during zipper use to 0 at removal. Linear regression analysis revealed 2 healing time predictors: infection size (B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = .008) and intervention interval of zipper use (B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = .001). A linear dose-response relationship was observed between intervention interval and healing time (Ptotal < .001, Pnonlinear = .406).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series identifies the fifth day post-I and D as a potential threshold, and suggests that the optimal period of zipper device use is 3 days to 5 days following I and D of skin abscess to enhance early wound healing, beyond which extended intervention intervals prolong wound healing time.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 8","pages":"314-322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Current management of pediatric cutaneous abscesses involves either spontaneous healing by secondary intention or suturing through tertiary intention, which are often lengthy processes that cause discomfort and distress among children. As it is noninvasive and simple, a novel zipper device is widely used for the primary wound closure of surgical incisions.
Objective: To describe the effectiveness of novel zipper device use for pediatric cutaneous abscess wound closure in an outpatient context.
Materials and methods: A total of 26 pediatric outpatients with simple cutaneous abscesses were included. After incision and drainage (I and D), the novel zipper device was applied once pus decreased significantly and fresh granulation tissue emerged. Wound healing time and pain score were tracked over the intervention period. Linear regression and restricted cubic spline models were also used to analyze the relationship between the intervention interval of time from I and D to zipper application and wound healing time.
Results: The average (SD) wound healing time was 12.73 (3.16) days. Pain scores decreased significantly from a median of 2 during zipper use to 0 at removal. Linear regression analysis revealed 2 healing time predictors: infection size (B = 0.260, SE = 0.090, β = 0.260, t = 2.924, P = .008) and intervention interval of zipper use (B = 0.850, SE = 0.090, β = 0.810, t = 9.187, P = .001). A linear dose-response relationship was observed between intervention interval and healing time (Ptotal < .001, Pnonlinear = .406).
Conclusion: This case series identifies the fifth day post-I and D as a potential threshold, and suggests that the optimal period of zipper device use is 3 days to 5 days following I and D of skin abscess to enhance early wound healing, beyond which extended intervention intervals prolong wound healing time.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.