Comparison of the efficacy of local thermotherapy versus Glucantime® in the treatment of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis: a pilot study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Fereshteh Safiabadi, Amirali Reihani, Ania Goli Khajeh, Masoud Maleki, Seyyedeh Zahra Ghasemi, Ali Khamesipour, Abdolmajid Fata, Habibollah Esmaily, Vahid Mashayekhi Goyonlo
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of local thermotherapy versus Glucantime® in the treatment of anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis: a pilot study.","authors":"Fereshteh Safiabadi, Amirali Reihani, Ania Goli Khajeh, Masoud Maleki, Seyyedeh Zahra Ghasemi, Ali Khamesipour, Abdolmajid Fata, Habibollah Esmaily, Vahid Mashayekhi Goyonlo","doi":"10.1007/s00436-025-08551-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot study is the first in Iran that evaluates the effectiveness of thermotherapy compared to intralesional Glucantime® in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica. Forty patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis were separated into two groups, each consisting of 20 patients. The control group received intralesional Glucantime® weekly for 8 weeks, while the other group received a single session of thermotherapy for each lesion using ThermoMedTM model 1.8. The patients were monitored for 6 months, during which the outcomes were evaluated by considering the dimensions, consistency, and rates of remission of the lesions. The terms \"initial remission\" and \"complete remission\" were clearly defined, and any instances of therapy failure were documented. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0, employing independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. Both treatment groups exhibited considerable decreases in lesion size and enhanced texture, with no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, the group that underwent thermotherapy demonstrated a more significant decrease in lesion size and improvement in texture after 6 months. The remission rates were similar; however, Glucantime® achieved a faster remission. No significant side effects were recorded in either group. The present study showed that thermotherapy was equally effective as intralesional Glucantime® in treating anthroponotic leishmaniasis. Thermotherapy can be considered as an alternative, especially when Glucantime® cannot be used, even though it requires further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19968,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology Research","volume":"124 9","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-025-08551-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot study is the first in Iran that evaluates the effectiveness of thermotherapy compared to intralesional Glucantime® in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania tropica. Forty patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis were separated into two groups, each consisting of 20 patients. The control group received intralesional Glucantime® weekly for 8 weeks, while the other group received a single session of thermotherapy for each lesion using ThermoMedTM model 1.8. The patients were monitored for 6 months, during which the outcomes were evaluated by considering the dimensions, consistency, and rates of remission of the lesions. The terms "initial remission" and "complete remission" were clearly defined, and any instances of therapy failure were documented. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0, employing independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA. Both treatment groups exhibited considerable decreases in lesion size and enhanced texture, with no statistically significant differences. Nevertheless, the group that underwent thermotherapy demonstrated a more significant decrease in lesion size and improvement in texture after 6 months. The remission rates were similar; however, Glucantime® achieved a faster remission. No significant side effects were recorded in either group. The present study showed that thermotherapy was equally effective as intralesional Glucantime® in treating anthroponotic leishmaniasis. Thermotherapy can be considered as an alternative, especially when Glucantime® cannot be used, even though it requires further research.

Abstract Image

局部热疗与葡聚糖治疗人源性皮肤利什曼病疗效的比较:一项初步研究。
这项试点研究是伊朗第一个评估热疗法与局部注射葡聚糖®治疗热带利什曼原虫引起的皮肤利什曼病的有效性的研究。将40例皮肤利什曼病患者分为两组,每组20例。对照组每周给予局部葡聚糖®治疗,持续8周,而另一组使用ThermoMedTM模型1.8对每个病变进行单次热疗。对患者进行为期6个月的监测,在此期间,通过考虑病变的尺寸,一致性和缓解率来评估结果。术语“初始缓解”和“完全缓解”有明确的定义,任何治疗失败的实例都有记录。统计学分析采用SPSS 24.0,采用独立t检验、卡方检验和方差分析。两个治疗组均表现出病变大小明显减小和纹理增强,但无统计学差异。然而,接受热疗的组在6个月后病变大小的减少和质地的改善更为显著。缓解率相似;然而,葡聚糖酶®获得更快的缓解。两组均无明显副作用。目前的研究表明,热疗法在治疗人源性利什曼病方面与局灶内葡聚糖®同样有效。热疗法可以被认为是一种替代方法,特别是当葡聚糖酶不能使用时,尽管它需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology Research
Parasitology Research 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Parasitology Research covers the latest developments in parasitology across a variety of disciplines, including biology, medicine and veterinary medicine. Among many topics discussed are chemotherapy and control of parasitic disease, and the relationship of host and parasite. Other coverage includes: Protozoology, Helminthology, Entomology; Morphology (incl. Pathomorphology, Ultrastructure); Biochemistry, Physiology including Pathophysiology; Parasite-Host-Relationships including Immunology and Host Specificity; life history, ecology and epidemiology; and Diagnosis, Chemotherapy and Control of Parasitic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信