{"title":"Accelerated motion-robust abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping using diamond radial sampling.","authors":"Sandeep Panwar Jogi, Qi Peng, Ramin Jafari, Ricardo Otazo, Can Wu","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a fast, motion-robust, free-breathing abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping method by combining variable-density diamond radial k-space sampling with fast-MAPSS (magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned-k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging was performed at 3T using five spin-lock time (TSL) pairs in phantom scans and three TSL pairs in nine healthy volunteers. Phantom experiments compared Cartesian sampling (reference) with stack-of-stars and diamond radial sampling. Volunteer scans utilized stack-of-stars and diamond sampling. T1ρ values were calculated using mono-exponential fitting with MAPSS (five or three TSL pairs) and fast-MAPSS (three TSLs). These values were compared across sampling methods and T1ρ techniques in phantom and in vivo for the liver, pancreas, and muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diamond sampling achieved a 2.2-fold acceleration compared to stack-of-stars. In phantom experiments, mean T1ρ differences from reference Cartesian MAPSS were -1.93% for stack-of-stars, and -0.09% for diamond sampling. Fast-MAPSS with three TSLs resulted in differences of 0.54% (stack-of-stars) and 1.45% (diamond). In volunteers, a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.88) was observed between diamond and stack-of-stars MAPSS, and between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS for both sampling methods. Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal biases (<1.5 ms) between the methods. Paired t-tests indicated no significant T1ρ differences between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS or between sampling methods in volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fast-MAPSS with diamond radial k-space sampling enables clinically feasible, motion-robust, free-breathing 3D T1ρ mapping of the abdomen with reduced scan time and quantification accuracy comparable to standard methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a fast, motion-robust, free-breathing abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping method by combining variable-density diamond radial k-space sampling with fast-MAPSS (magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned-k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots).
Methods: 3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging was performed at 3T using five spin-lock time (TSL) pairs in phantom scans and three TSL pairs in nine healthy volunteers. Phantom experiments compared Cartesian sampling (reference) with stack-of-stars and diamond radial sampling. Volunteer scans utilized stack-of-stars and diamond sampling. T1ρ values were calculated using mono-exponential fitting with MAPSS (five or three TSL pairs) and fast-MAPSS (three TSLs). These values were compared across sampling methods and T1ρ techniques in phantom and in vivo for the liver, pancreas, and muscles.
Results: Diamond sampling achieved a 2.2-fold acceleration compared to stack-of-stars. In phantom experiments, mean T1ρ differences from reference Cartesian MAPSS were -1.93% for stack-of-stars, and -0.09% for diamond sampling. Fast-MAPSS with three TSLs resulted in differences of 0.54% (stack-of-stars) and 1.45% (diamond). In volunteers, a strong correlation (R2 ≥ 0.88) was observed between diamond and stack-of-stars MAPSS, and between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS for both sampling methods. Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal biases (<1.5 ms) between the methods. Paired t-tests indicated no significant T1ρ differences between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS or between sampling methods in volunteers.
Conclusion: Fast-MAPSS with diamond radial k-space sampling enables clinically feasible, motion-robust, free-breathing 3D T1ρ mapping of the abdomen with reduced scan time and quantification accuracy comparable to standard methods.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.