Accelerated motion-robust abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping using diamond radial sampling.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sandeep Panwar Jogi, Qi Peng, Ramin Jafari, Ricardo Otazo, Can Wu
{"title":"Accelerated motion-robust abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping using diamond radial sampling.","authors":"Sandeep Panwar Jogi, Qi Peng, Ramin Jafari, Ricardo Otazo, Can Wu","doi":"10.1002/mrm.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop and validate a fast, motion-robust, free-breathing abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping method by combining variable-density diamond radial k-space sampling with fast-MAPSS (magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned-k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging was performed at 3T using five spin-lock time (TSL) pairs in phantom scans and three TSL pairs in nine healthy volunteers. Phantom experiments compared Cartesian sampling (reference) with stack-of-stars and diamond radial sampling. Volunteer scans utilized stack-of-stars and diamond sampling. T1ρ values were calculated using mono-exponential fitting with MAPSS (five or three TSL pairs) and fast-MAPSS (three TSLs). These values were compared across sampling methods and T1ρ techniques in phantom and in vivo for the liver, pancreas, and muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diamond sampling achieved a 2.2-fold acceleration compared to stack-of-stars. In phantom experiments, mean T1ρ differences from reference Cartesian MAPSS were -1.93% for stack-of-stars, and -0.09% for diamond sampling. Fast-MAPSS with three TSLs resulted in differences of 0.54% (stack-of-stars) and 1.45% (diamond). In volunteers, a strong correlation (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.88) was observed between diamond and stack-of-stars MAPSS, and between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS for both sampling methods. Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal biases (<1.5 ms) between the methods. Paired t-tests indicated no significant T1ρ differences between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS or between sampling methods in volunteers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fast-MAPSS with diamond radial k-space sampling enables clinically feasible, motion-robust, free-breathing 3D T1ρ mapping of the abdomen with reduced scan time and quantification accuracy comparable to standard methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a fast, motion-robust, free-breathing abdominal 3D T1ρ mapping method by combining variable-density diamond radial k-space sampling with fast-MAPSS (magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned-k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots).

Methods: 3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging was performed at 3T using five spin-lock time (TSL) pairs in phantom scans and three TSL pairs in nine healthy volunteers. Phantom experiments compared Cartesian sampling (reference) with stack-of-stars and diamond radial sampling. Volunteer scans utilized stack-of-stars and diamond sampling. T1ρ values were calculated using mono-exponential fitting with MAPSS (five or three TSL pairs) and fast-MAPSS (three TSLs). These values were compared across sampling methods and T1ρ techniques in phantom and in vivo for the liver, pancreas, and muscles.

Results: Diamond sampling achieved a 2.2-fold acceleration compared to stack-of-stars. In phantom experiments, mean T1ρ differences from reference Cartesian MAPSS were -1.93% for stack-of-stars, and -0.09% for diamond sampling. Fast-MAPSS with three TSLs resulted in differences of 0.54% (stack-of-stars) and 1.45% (diamond). In volunteers, a strong correlation (R2 ≥ 0.88) was observed between diamond and stack-of-stars MAPSS, and between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS for both sampling methods. Bland-Altman analysis revealed minimal biases (<1.5 ms) between the methods. Paired t-tests indicated no significant T1ρ differences between MAPSS and fast-MAPSS or between sampling methods in volunteers.

Conclusion: Fast-MAPSS with diamond radial k-space sampling enables clinically feasible, motion-robust, free-breathing 3D T1ρ mapping of the abdomen with reduced scan time and quantification accuracy comparable to standard methods.

使用金刚石径向采样加速运动鲁棒腹部三维T1ρ映射。
目的:通过将变密度钻石径向k空间采样与快速mapss(磁化制备的角度调制分区k空间破坏梯度回波快照)相结合,开发并验证一种快速、运动鲁棒、自由呼吸的腹部3D T1ρ测绘方法。方法:对9名健康志愿者在3T时使用5对自旋锁定时间(TSL)和3对自旋锁定时间(TSL)进行三维MAPSS T1ρ成像。幻影实验将笛卡尔采样(参考)与星堆和钻石径向采样进行了比较。志愿者利用星图和钻石取样进行扫描。利用MAPSS(5对或3对TSL)和fast-MAPSS(3对TSL)的单指数拟合计算T1ρ值。这些值通过采样方法和T1ρ技术在幻影和活体中对肝脏、胰腺和肌肉进行了比较。结果:钻石取样比星堆取样实现了2.2倍的加速。在模拟实验中,星星堆叠与参考笛卡尔MAPSS的平均T1ρ差为-1.93%,钻石采样的平均值为-0.09%。3个TSLs的Fast-MAPSS差异为0.54% (stack-of-stars)和1.45% (diamond)。在志愿者中,两种采样方法中,钻石和星形堆栈MAPSS之间以及MAPSS和快速MAPSS之间存在很强的相关性(R2≥0.88)。Bland-Altman分析显示最小偏差(结论:Fast-MAPSS与钻石径向k空间采样能够实现临床可行,运动稳健,自由呼吸的腹部3D T1ρ测绘,与标准方法相比,扫描时间缩短,量化精度提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
24.20%
发文量
376
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信