Barriers and Timely Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Megan T Nguyen, Emily Kistner-Griffin, Reid DeMass, Bhisham S Chera, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Katherine R Sterba, Elizabeth G Hill, Brian Nussenbaum, Anthony J Alberg, Vlad C Sandulache, David J Hernandez, Ryan S Jackson, Sidharth V Puram, Russel Kahmke, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Gail Jackson, Sue S Yom, Evan M Graboyes
{"title":"Barriers and Timely Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.","authors":"Megan T Nguyen, Emily Kistner-Griffin, Reid DeMass, Bhisham S Chera, Chanita Hughes Halbert, Katherine R Sterba, Elizabeth G Hill, Brian Nussenbaum, Anthony J Alberg, Vlad C Sandulache, David J Hernandez, Ryan S Jackson, Sidharth V Puram, Russel Kahmke, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Gail Jackson, Sue S Yom, Evan M Graboyes","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery is associated with improved outcomes among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the relationship of barriers to care with timely PORT is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To categorize barriers to timely PORT, evaluate the association of barriers to care with initiation of timely PORT, and describe the primary reason for delay among patients without timely PORT.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective cohort study at a US academic medical center included adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative-intent surgery with an indication for PORT. Patients were recruited for the study from May 19, 2020, to November 6, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was initiation of timely PORT, defined as starting radiation therapy within 6 weeks of surgery. Barriers to PORT were prospectively collected via patient self-report and the electronic health record. Among patients who did not start PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, the primary reason for delay was defined as the singular barrier category that most directly led to the delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 78 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.5 [10.8] years; 54 males [69.2%]), 32 patients (41%) initiated PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, and 46 patients (59%) did not initiate PORT within 6 weeks of surgery. Each additional barrier was associated with a decreased odds of initiating timely PORT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63-1.01]); patients with 5 or more barriers had a 76% reduction in the odds of starting PORT within 6 weeks of surgery relative to those with 0 to 2 barriers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 [95 CI%, 0.06-0.84]) on multivariable analysis. When analyzed by barrier category, patients with a perioperative adverse effects-related barrier were less likely to initiate timely PORT than patients without a perioperative adverse effects barrier (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.66]) on multivariable analysis. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination (19/46 [41.3%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, patients with a greater number of barriers and those with a barrier related to the perioperative adverse effects category were less likely to initiate timely PORT. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination. Efforts to improve timely PORT should focus on decreasing the number of barriers, improving surgical quality, and enhancing care coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12426859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Initiation of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) within 6 weeks of surgery is associated with improved outcomes among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, the relationship of barriers to care with timely PORT is unknown.

Objective: To categorize barriers to timely PORT, evaluate the association of barriers to care with initiation of timely PORT, and describe the primary reason for delay among patients without timely PORT.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study at a US academic medical center included adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing curative-intent surgery with an indication for PORT. Patients were recruited for the study from May 19, 2020, to November 6, 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was initiation of timely PORT, defined as starting radiation therapy within 6 weeks of surgery. Barriers to PORT were prospectively collected via patient self-report and the electronic health record. Among patients who did not start PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, the primary reason for delay was defined as the singular barrier category that most directly led to the delay.

Results: Among 78 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.5 [10.8] years; 54 males [69.2%]), 32 patients (41%) initiated PORT within 6 weeks of surgery, and 46 patients (59%) did not initiate PORT within 6 weeks of surgery. Each additional barrier was associated with a decreased odds of initiating timely PORT (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.63-1.01]); patients with 5 or more barriers had a 76% reduction in the odds of starting PORT within 6 weeks of surgery relative to those with 0 to 2 barriers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 [95 CI%, 0.06-0.84]) on multivariable analysis. When analyzed by barrier category, patients with a perioperative adverse effects-related barrier were less likely to initiate timely PORT than patients without a perioperative adverse effects barrier (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.66]) on multivariable analysis. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination (19/46 [41.3%]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this prospective cohort study, patients with a greater number of barriers and those with a barrier related to the perioperative adverse effects category were less likely to initiate timely PORT. Among patients without timely PORT, the most common primary reason for delay was a barrier related to poor care coordination. Efforts to improve timely PORT should focus on decreasing the number of barriers, improving surgical quality, and enhancing care coordination.

头颈部肿瘤的屏障与术后及时放疗。
重要性:头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者术后6周内开始放射治疗(PORT)与改善预后相关。然而,护理障碍与及时PORT的关系尚不清楚。目的:对及时进行PORT的障碍进行分类,评估护理障碍与及时开始PORT的关系,并描述未及时进行PORT的患者延迟的主要原因。设计、环境和参与者:这项在美国学术医学中心进行的前瞻性队列研究包括接受有PORT指证的治疗目的手术的成人头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者。该研究从2020年5月19日至2023年11月6日招募患者。主要结局和措施:主要结局是及时开始PORT,定义为在手术6周内开始放射治疗。通过患者自我报告和电子健康记录前瞻性地收集PORT障碍。在手术6周内未开始PORT的患者中,延迟的主要原因被定义为最直接导致延迟的单一屏障类别。结果:78例患者(平均[SD]年龄61.5[10.8]岁,男性54例[69.2%]),32例(41%)在手术6周内开始PORT, 46例(59%)未在手术6周内开始PORT。每增加一个屏障,及时启动PORT的几率就会降低(调整后的优势比为0.81 [95% CI, 0.63-1.01]);在多变量分析中,有5个或更多障碍的患者在手术6周内开始PORT的几率比0 - 2个障碍的患者低76%(校正优势比为0.24 [95 CI%, 0.06-0.84])。当按屏障类别进行分析时,有围手术期不良反应相关屏障的患者比没有围手术期不良反应屏障的患者更不可能及时启动PORT(校正优势比为0.17 [95% CI, 0.04-0.66])。在未及时进行PORT的患者中,最常见的延迟主要原因是与护理协调不良相关的障碍(19/46[41.3%])。结论及相关性:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,障碍数量较多的患者以及与围手术期不良反应类别相关的患者不太可能及时启动PORT。在没有及时PORT的患者中,最常见的延迟主要原因是与护理协调不良相关的障碍。提高及时PORT的工作应侧重于减少障碍数量,提高手术质量,加强护理协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信