Novel 3d-printed Coaxial Light Microscope Adapter for Ophthalmic Wet Lab.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Giovanni Rubegni, Mario Fruschelli, Lorenzo Mensi, Martina Mugnai, Tommaso Padula, Alessandro Avitabile, Gian Marco Tosi
{"title":"Novel 3d-printed Coaxial Light Microscope Adapter for Ophthalmic Wet Lab.","authors":"Giovanni Rubegni, Mario Fruschelli, Lorenzo Mensi, Martina Mugnai, Tommaso Padula, Alessandro Avitabile, Gian Marco Tosi","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the usability and training effectiveness of a 3D-printed coaxial illumination system mounted on an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope to a professional ophthalmic surgical microscope, in cataract surgery simulation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ophthalmology Lab, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomized crossover study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty ophthalmology residents performed simulated cataract surgery steps, including corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, and corneal suturing, on porcine eyes using an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope and a Zeiss OPMI Lumera 700. The stereo microscope was equipped with a 3D-printed coaxial light adapter. After each simulation, participants completed a 5-item evaluation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Zeiss microscope received significantly higher scores for image quality (4.15 vs. 3.40, p < 0.001) and red reflex visibility (4.10 vs. 3.25, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in depth perception, ergonomics, or ease of instrument handling. The stereo microscope scored higher in the SUS (80.5 ± 5.48 vs. 66.6 ± 4.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified stereo microscope with 3D-printed coaxial illumination represents a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic wet lab training. Despite lower optical performance, its usability and affordability make it a valuable tool for simulation-based education, particularly in low-resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the usability and training effectiveness of a 3D-printed coaxial illumination system mounted on an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope to a professional ophthalmic surgical microscope, in cataract surgery simulation.

Setting: Ophthalmology Lab, Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Design: Prospective randomized crossover study.

Methods: Twenty ophthalmology residents performed simulated cataract surgery steps, including corneal incisions, capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, and corneal suturing, on porcine eyes using an off-the-shelf stereo-microscope and a Zeiss OPMI Lumera 700. The stereo microscope was equipped with a 3D-printed coaxial light adapter. After each simulation, participants completed a 5-item evaluation questionnaire (5-point Likert scale) and the System Usability Scale (SUS).

Results: The Zeiss microscope received significantly higher scores for image quality (4.15 vs. 3.40, p < 0.001) and red reflex visibility (4.10 vs. 3.25, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in depth perception, ergonomics, or ease of instrument handling. The stereo microscope scored higher in the SUS (80.5 ± 5.48 vs. 66.6 ± 4.95, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The modified stereo microscope with 3D-printed coaxial illumination represents a cost-effective alternative for ophthalmic wet lab training. Despite lower optical performance, its usability and affordability make it a valuable tool for simulation-based education, particularly in low-resource settings.

新型3d打印同轴光学显微镜适配器眼科湿实验室。
目的:比较3d打印同轴照明系统安装在现成的立体显微镜上与专业眼科手术显微镜在白内障手术模拟中的可用性和培训效果。单位:意大利锡耶纳锡耶纳大学内科、外科和神经科学系眼科实验室。设计:前瞻性随机交叉研究。方法:20名眼科住院医师使用现成的立体显微镜和蔡司OPMI Lumera 700在猪眼上模拟白内障手术步骤,包括角膜切口、撕裂、水解剖和角膜缝合。立体显微镜配有3d打印的同轴光适配器。每次模拟后,参与者完成5项评估问卷(5点李克特量表)和系统可用性量表(SUS)。结果:蔡司显微镜在图像质量(4.15比3.40,p < 0.001)和红色反射可见性(4.10比3.25,p < 0.001)方面得分显著高于蔡司显微镜。在深度感知、人体工程学或仪器操作的便利性方面没有观察到显著差异。立体显微镜对SUS的评分较高(80.5±5.48比66.6±4.95,p < 0.001)。结论:3d打印同轴照明的改进立体显微镜是一种具有成本效益的眼科湿实验室培训替代方案。尽管光学性能较低,但其可用性和可负担性使其成为基于模拟的教育的宝贵工具,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信