Comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential in mental health benefits in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Theodore Rokkas, Konstantinos Ekmektzoglou, Evangelia Tsanou, Ludovica Bricca, Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Paraskevas Golfakis, Katerina Kotzampassi
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential in mental health benefits in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Theodore Rokkas, Konstantinos Ekmektzoglou, Evangelia Tsanou, Ludovica Bricca, Alexandra-Eleftheria Menni, Paraskevas Golfakis, Katerina Kotzampassi","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of probiotics as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is gaining attention, with recent studies indicating that certain probiotics or combinations may have mental health benefits for patients with IBS.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To systematically review and meta-analyze, using network meta-analysis (NWM), the comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with IBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, using a Bayesian NWM, to compare the performance of probiotics with mental health benefits in IBS treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 3154 participants assigned to nine different treatments: Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotic combinations, and placebo. B. longum and probiotic combinations were found to be significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of improving quality of life (QoL), B. longum was the most effective (SUCRA = 89.7%), while L. plantarum was the least effective (SUCRA = 14.9%). For alleviating depression and anxiety, the combination of probiotics (SUCRA = 95.6%) and L. acidophilus (SUCRA = 74.2%) showed the best results, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific strains that may be advantageous. More high-quality RCTs are needed to substantiate these therapeutic possibilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of probiotics as a treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is gaining attention, with recent studies indicating that certain probiotics or combinations may have mental health benefits for patients with IBS.

Aims: To systematically review and meta-analyze, using network meta-analysis (NWM), the comparative effectiveness and safety of probiotics with psychotropic potential on quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with IBS.

Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, using a Bayesian NWM, to compare the performance of probiotics with mental health benefits in IBS treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using surfaces under cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values.

Results: The analysis included 3154 participants assigned to nine different treatments: Bifidobacterium longum, Saccharomyces, Clostridium butyricum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota, Lactobacillus plantarum, probiotic combinations, and placebo. B. longum and probiotic combinations were found to be significantly more effective than placebo. In terms of improving quality of life (QoL), B. longum was the most effective (SUCRA = 89.7%), while L. plantarum was the least effective (SUCRA = 14.9%). For alleviating depression and anxiety, the combination of probiotics (SUCRA = 95.6%) and L. acidophilus (SUCRA = 74.2%) showed the best results, respectively.

Conclusion: Some probiotics or combinations may offer benefits for patients with IBS in improving QoL, depression, and anxiety; however, as this is a developing field, additional research is necessary to fully understand the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, and specific strains that may be advantageous. More high-quality RCTs are needed to substantiate these therapeutic possibilities.

具有精神药物潜力的益生菌对肠易激综合征心理健康益处的比较有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析
背景:使用益生菌治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)越来越受到关注,最近的研究表明,某些益生菌或组合可能对IBS患者的心理健康有益。目的:采用网络荟萃分析(network meta-analysis, NWM)对具有精神药物潜力的益生菌对IBS患者生活质量、抑郁和焦虑的有效性和安全性进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。方法:采用贝叶斯NWM对相关随机对照试验(rct)进行分析,比较益生菌与心理健康益处在IBS治疗中的表现。采用表面累积排序(SUCRA)值评估治疗效果。结果:该分析包括3154名参与者,他们被分配到9个不同的治疗组:长双歧杆菌、酵母菌、丁酸梭菌、乳酸双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌Shirota菌株、植物乳杆菌、益生菌组合和安慰剂。B. longum和益生菌组合被发现明显比安慰剂更有效。在改善生活质量(QoL)方面,长叶双歧杆菌(SUCRA = 89.7%)效果最好,而植物双歧杆菌(SUCRA = 14.9%)效果最差。在缓解抑郁和焦虑方面,益生菌(SUCRA = 95.6%)和嗜酸乳杆菌(SUCRA = 74.2%)的组合效果最好。结论:某些益生菌或联合使用可能对IBS患者的生活质量、抑郁和焦虑有改善作用;然而,由于这是一个发展中的领域,需要进一步的研究来充分了解其有效性、潜在机制和可能有利的特定菌株。需要更多高质量的随机对照试验来证实这些治疗的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信