Evaluating the completeness of postoperative endoscopic recurrence assessment in Crohn's disease patients with Kono-S anastomoses.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Nikita Parkash, Charlotte Keung, Sally J Bell, Gregory T Moore
{"title":"Evaluating the completeness of postoperative endoscopic recurrence assessment in Crohn's disease patients with Kono-S anastomoses.","authors":"Nikita Parkash, Charlotte Keung, Sally J Bell, Gregory T Moore","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000003063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite therapeutic advances, resection rates in Crohn's disease remain high. Kono-S is a novel anastomosis for ileocolonic resections; however, its altered configuration may challenge standard endoscopic assessment, particularly in the absence of validated scoring tools. This study evaluated the endoscopic assessment of Kono-S anastomosis anatomy and recurrence stratification using Rutgeert's score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included colonoscopies performed on Crohn's disease patients with Kono-S anastomosis between March 2021 and 2025. Data included procedure dates, endoscopist subspecialty [inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) vs. non-IBD], and colonoscopy findings. Colonoscopies were rescored via Rutgeert's score and evaluated for completeness of assessment, defined as correct identification and photodocumentation of the anastomosis substructures. Factors associated with completeness were determined using Mann-Whitney U or Fisher's exact tests. Inter-rater reliability between endoscopists was calculated using Fleiss' kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine colonoscopies performed a median of 31 weeks postsurgery were included. Endoscopic recurrence (≥i2b) was 16.2% (median follow-up 153 weeks). Most procedures (89.5%) were performed by IBD subspecialists. Thorough assessments were achieved in 73.5% of colonoscopies, with IBD endoscopists significantly more likely to provide complete assessments (79.5%) compared with non-IBD endoscopists (20%, P = 0.014). Agreement with the rescored Rutgeerts occurred in 41 (93.2%) cases. Concordance with the central reading was high for IBD endoscopists (Fleiss' kappa: 0.897, P < 0.001) but tended towards moderate for non-IBD endoscopists (Fleiss' kappa: 0.467, P = 0.351).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With increasing adoption of the Kono-S technique, this study suggests that IBD-specific endoscopy training is essential for accurate assessment of postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000003063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Despite therapeutic advances, resection rates in Crohn's disease remain high. Kono-S is a novel anastomosis for ileocolonic resections; however, its altered configuration may challenge standard endoscopic assessment, particularly in the absence of validated scoring tools. This study evaluated the endoscopic assessment of Kono-S anastomosis anatomy and recurrence stratification using Rutgeert's score.

Methods: This retrospective study included colonoscopies performed on Crohn's disease patients with Kono-S anastomosis between March 2021 and 2025. Data included procedure dates, endoscopist subspecialty [inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) vs. non-IBD], and colonoscopy findings. Colonoscopies were rescored via Rutgeert's score and evaluated for completeness of assessment, defined as correct identification and photodocumentation of the anastomosis substructures. Factors associated with completeness were determined using Mann-Whitney U or Fisher's exact tests. Inter-rater reliability between endoscopists was calculated using Fleiss' kappa.

Results: Forty-nine colonoscopies performed a median of 31 weeks postsurgery were included. Endoscopic recurrence (≥i2b) was 16.2% (median follow-up 153 weeks). Most procedures (89.5%) were performed by IBD subspecialists. Thorough assessments were achieved in 73.5% of colonoscopies, with IBD endoscopists significantly more likely to provide complete assessments (79.5%) compared with non-IBD endoscopists (20%, P = 0.014). Agreement with the rescored Rutgeerts occurred in 41 (93.2%) cases. Concordance with the central reading was high for IBD endoscopists (Fleiss' kappa: 0.897, P < 0.001) but tended towards moderate for non-IBD endoscopists (Fleiss' kappa: 0.467, P = 0.351).

Conclusion: With increasing adoption of the Kono-S technique, this study suggests that IBD-specific endoscopy training is essential for accurate assessment of postoperative recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.

评价采用Kono-S吻合术的克罗恩病患者术后内镜下复发评估的完整性。
背景和目的:尽管治疗进步,克罗恩病的切除率仍然很高。Kono-S是一种用于回肠结肠切除术的新型吻合术;然而,其改变的结构可能会挑战标准的内镜评估,特别是在缺乏经过验证的评分工具的情况下。本研究使用Rutgeert评分评估内镜下Kono-S吻合解剖和复发分层。方法:本回顾性研究包括2021年3月至2025年3月期间对克罗恩病患者行Kono-S吻合术的结肠镜检查。数据包括手术日期、内窥镜医师亚专科[炎症性肠病(IBD)与非IBD]和结肠镜检查结果。通过Rutgeert评分重新进行结肠镜检查,并评估评估的完整性,定义为正确识别和吻合亚结构的照片记录。使用Mann-Whitney U或Fisher精确检验确定与完整性相关的因素。使用Fleiss kappa计算内窥镜医师间的信度。结果:49例结肠镜检查中位数为术后31周。内镜下复发率(≥i2b)为16.2%(中位随访153周)。大多数手术(89.5%)由IBD专科医生完成。73.5%的结肠镜检查完成了彻底的评估,与非IBD内窥镜医生(20%,P = 0.014)相比,IBD内窥镜医生更有可能提供完整的评估(79.5%)。41例(93.2%)与恢复的Rutgeerts一致。结论:随着Kono-S技术的日益普及,本研究表明,IBD特异性内镜训练对于准确评估克罗恩病患者术后复发至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信