Effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diets on type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Eastern vs. Western populations

IF 7.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pichanun Mongkolsucharitkul , Apinya Surawit , Apiradee Pimsen , Siriluk Winitchayothin , Sureeporn Pumeiam , Bonggochpass Pinsawas , Suphawan Ophakas , Sophida Suta , Phongthana Pasookhush , Korapat Mayurasakorn
{"title":"Effectiveness of low-carbohydrate diets on type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Eastern vs. Western populations","authors":"Pichanun Mongkolsucharitkul ,&nbsp;Apinya Surawit ,&nbsp;Apiradee Pimsen ,&nbsp;Siriluk Winitchayothin ,&nbsp;Sureeporn Pumeiam ,&nbsp;Bonggochpass Pinsawas ,&nbsp;Suphawan Ophakas ,&nbsp;Sophida Suta ,&nbsp;Phongthana Pasookhush ,&nbsp;Korapat Mayurasakorn","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) have emerged as a potential dietary intervention for managing glycemic control, but their effectiveness across different cultural contexts remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy of LCDs in managing type 2 diabetes, with attention to cultural context, and to clarify how variability in carbohydrate definitions affects interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 1 August 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes. We conducted exploratory analyses by Eastern versus Western setting and dose–response <em>meta</em>-regression using actual carbohydrate intake at the follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 2,870; 7 Eastern, 20 Western) were included. Across analyzed time points, no arm sustained carbohydrate intake &lt; 10 % of total energy; therefore, findings generalize to low-to-moderate carbohydrate rather than very-low-carbohydrate. LCDs improved glycemia short-term: HbA1c − 0.29 %, with the largest effect at 3 months. Fasting blood glucose decreased overall (−7.12 mg/dL). Weight loss was greatest at 3 months and attenuated thereafter. At 3 months, lower actual carbohydrate intake was related to larger HbA1c and weight reductions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LCDs offer modest, short-term metabolic benefits for type 2 diabetes management, but benefits diminish over time. Cultural context may shape responses, underscoring individualized, culturally tailored care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 112464"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725004784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) have emerged as a potential dietary intervention for managing glycemic control, but their effectiveness across different cultural contexts remains unclear. To evaluate the efficacy of LCDs in managing type 2 diabetes, with attention to cultural context, and to clarify how variability in carbohydrate definitions affects interpretation.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to 1 August 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) ≥ 12 weeks in adults with type 2 diabetes. We conducted exploratory analyses by Eastern versus Western setting and dose–response meta-regression using actual carbohydrate intake at the follow-up.

Results

Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 2,870; 7 Eastern, 20 Western) were included. Across analyzed time points, no arm sustained carbohydrate intake < 10 % of total energy; therefore, findings generalize to low-to-moderate carbohydrate rather than very-low-carbohydrate. LCDs improved glycemia short-term: HbA1c − 0.29 %, with the largest effect at 3 months. Fasting blood glucose decreased overall (−7.12 mg/dL). Weight loss was greatest at 3 months and attenuated thereafter. At 3 months, lower actual carbohydrate intake was related to larger HbA1c and weight reductions.

Conclusions

LCDs offer modest, short-term metabolic benefits for type 2 diabetes management, but benefits diminish over time. Cultural context may shape responses, underscoring individualized, culturally tailored care.

Abstract Image

低碳水化合物饮食对2型糖尿病的疗效:东西方人群随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:低碳水化合物饮食(lcd)已成为一种潜在的血糖控制饮食干预手段,但其在不同文化背景下的有效性尚不清楚。评估lcd治疗2型糖尿病的疗效,注意文化背景,并阐明碳水化合物定义的可变性如何影响解释。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase和Scopus从成立到2024年8月1日的随机对照试验(RCTs) ≥ 12 周的成人2型糖尿病患者。我们通过东方和西方环境进行了探索性分析,并在随访时使用实际碳水化合物摄入量进行了剂量-反应meta回归。结果:共纳入27项rct (n = 2,870;东部7项,西部20项)。结论:lcd为2型糖尿病治疗提供适度的短期代谢益处,但益处随着时间的推移而减少。文化背景可能会影响反应,强调个性化、文化量身定制的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信