Surface properties of direct restorations and adjacent dental tissues after saliva exposure.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.091
Patrícia Valéria Manozzo Kunz, Roberta da Veiga, Vania Camargo, Marina da Rosa Kaizer, Gisele Maria Correr, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
{"title":"Surface properties of direct restorations and adjacent dental tissues after saliva exposure.","authors":"Patrícia Valéria Manozzo Kunz, Roberta da Veiga, Vania Camargo, Marina da Rosa Kaizer, Gisele Maria Correr, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed the effect of saliva exposure on roughness (Ra) and Vickers hardness (VHN) of two direct restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restorations. Enamel and dentin cavities in molars (n = 10) were restored with a) bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill, BF) with the application of a universal adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal) and b) alkasite restorative material (Cention N, CN) with and without the application of a universal adhesive. After 24 h (baseline), surface roughness and hardness of the restorative material and dental tissues were assessed at 100 μm from the tooth/restoration interface. The specimens were subjected to degradation in whole saliva for 7 days (combined with the application of 20% sucrose 10x/day). Ra and VHN were then reassessed. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). BF exhibited a significantly lower Ra than CN. Ra increased significantly after degradation in saliva when compared to baseline values. Enamel hardness was higher for BF restorations. No differences in enamel hardness were observed for alkasite restorations with and without adhesive application. For dentin hardness, significantly lower values were found in alkasite restorations with previous application of an adhesive system. It can be concluded that BF had a smoother surface than CN before and after degradation. Immersion in saliva reduced the hardness of both restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"39 ","pages":"e091"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of saliva exposure on roughness (Ra) and Vickers hardness (VHN) of two direct restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restorations. Enamel and dentin cavities in molars (n = 10) were restored with a) bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric N-Flow Bulk Fill, BF) with the application of a universal adhesive (Tetric N-Bond Universal) and b) alkasite restorative material (Cention N, CN) with and without the application of a universal adhesive. After 24 h (baseline), surface roughness and hardness of the restorative material and dental tissues were assessed at 100 μm from the tooth/restoration interface. The specimens were subjected to degradation in whole saliva for 7 days (combined with the application of 20% sucrose 10x/day). Ra and VHN were then reassessed. The data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 5%). BF exhibited a significantly lower Ra than CN. Ra increased significantly after degradation in saliva when compared to baseline values. Enamel hardness was higher for BF restorations. No differences in enamel hardness were observed for alkasite restorations with and without adhesive application. For dentin hardness, significantly lower values were found in alkasite restorations with previous application of an adhesive system. It can be concluded that BF had a smoother surface than CN before and after degradation. Immersion in saliva reduced the hardness of both restorative materials, enamel, and dentin adjacent to the restoration.

Abstract Image

唾液暴露后直接修复体和邻近牙组织的表面特性。
本研究评估了唾液暴露对两种直接修复材料(牙釉质和牙本质)的粗糙度(Ra)和维氏硬度(VHN)的影响。对10例磨牙的牙釉质和牙本质牙槽进行修复,分别采用a)填充树脂复合材料(Tetric n - flow Bulk Fill, BF)和b)碱石质修复材料(Cention n, CN),分别使用和不使用通用粘合剂。24 h(基线)后,在距牙齿/修复体界面100 μm处评估修复体材料和牙组织的表面粗糙度和硬度。样品在全唾液中降解7天(同时使用20%蔗糖10x/天)。然后重新评估Ra和VHN。数据采用方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 5%)。BF的Ra明显低于CN。与基线值相比,唾液降解后Ra显著增加。BF修复体釉质硬度较高。使用粘接剂和不使用粘接剂时,牙釉质硬度无差异。对于牙本质硬度,在以前使用粘接剂系统的碱性石修复体中发现明显较低的值。结果表明,降解前后BF的表面比CN光滑。浸泡在唾液中会降低修复材料、牙釉质和牙本质的硬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信