[Neo-institutionalization in the context of psychiatric reform: an analysis of the trajectory of Psychosocial Care Center (PCC) users].

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1590/1413-81232025308.00752024
Luisa Motta Corrêa, Rossano Cabral Lima
{"title":"[Neo-institutionalization in the context of psychiatric reform: an analysis of the trajectory of Psychosocial Care Center (PCC) users].","authors":"Luisa Motta Corrêa, Rossano Cabral Lima","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232025308.00752024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deinstitutionalization enables the removal of users from asylums with the support of the Psychosocial Care Network (PCN), which is based on the Psychosocial Care Centers (PCCs). One of the current impasses is the emergence of private/religious institutions that are updating the asylum model. In order to analyze what leads to neo-institutionalization in these locations, an ethnographical study was carried out on nine cases in four PCCs of the three PCNs in the city of Rio de Janeiro, through scrutiny of medical records, interviews with the patient, family members, PCC technicians and managers of the asylums per se. These locations were institutionalized despite the support of the PCCs and were selected for the research due to the diversity of characteristics, territories and institutional destinations that permitted investigation. The conclusion drawn is that neo-institutionalization is motivated by different factors: crisis, asylum concept, disarticulation and precariousness of intra- and intersectoral networks, reduced teams and insufficient number of territorial services, institutionalization of PCCs, low crisis reception capacity, family overload and family expectations, lack of regular support for family members and housing projects for users whose caregivers have died, are elderly or become ill.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"30 8","pages":"e00752024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025308.00752024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deinstitutionalization enables the removal of users from asylums with the support of the Psychosocial Care Network (PCN), which is based on the Psychosocial Care Centers (PCCs). One of the current impasses is the emergence of private/religious institutions that are updating the asylum model. In order to analyze what leads to neo-institutionalization in these locations, an ethnographical study was carried out on nine cases in four PCCs of the three PCNs in the city of Rio de Janeiro, through scrutiny of medical records, interviews with the patient, family members, PCC technicians and managers of the asylums per se. These locations were institutionalized despite the support of the PCCs and were selected for the research due to the diversity of characteristics, territories and institutional destinations that permitted investigation. The conclusion drawn is that neo-institutionalization is motivated by different factors: crisis, asylum concept, disarticulation and precariousness of intra- and intersectoral networks, reduced teams and insufficient number of territorial services, institutionalization of PCCs, low crisis reception capacity, family overload and family expectations, lack of regular support for family members and housing projects for users whose caregivers have died, are elderly or become ill.

[精神病学改革背景下的新机构化:心理社会护理中心(PCC)使用者轨迹分析]。
在以社会心理护理中心为基础的社会心理护理网络(PCN)的支持下,去机构化能够将使用者从精神病院移走。目前的僵局之一是正在更新庇护模式的私人/宗教机构的出现。为了分析导致这些地方出现新机构化的原因,通过审查医疗记录、与病人、家属、PCC技术人员和收容所本身的管理人员面谈,对里约热内卢市3个pcn中的4个PCC中的9个病例进行了人种学研究。尽管得到了pccc的支持,但这些地点仍被制度化,并被选中进行研究,因为它们的特征、领土和机构目的地的多样性允许进行调查。得出的结论是,新机构化是由不同因素驱动的:危机、庇护概念、部门内和部门间网络的脱节和不稳定、团队减少和区域服务数量不足、社区服务机构化、危机接待能力低、家庭超负荷和家庭期望、缺乏对家庭成员的定期支持以及为照顾者死亡、年老或生病的用户提供住房项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信