Evaluating microbial load on dental curing lights and the impact of protective barriers on resin composites.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.085
Maria Eugênia Alvarez-Leite, Flávia Araújo Alves, Adrielly Ferreira Cardozo, Pedro Aleixo Garcia Paim Ribeiro, Victor de Morais Gomes, Cristina Dutra Vieira, Márcia Almeida Lana, Alberto Nogueira da Gama Antunes
{"title":"Evaluating microbial load on dental curing lights and the impact of protective barriers on resin composites.","authors":"Maria Eugênia Alvarez-Leite, Flávia Araújo Alves, Adrielly Ferreira Cardozo, Pedro Aleixo Garcia Paim Ribeiro, Victor de Morais Gomes, Cristina Dutra Vieira, Márcia Almeida Lana, Alberto Nogueira da Gama Antunes","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contamination of dental curing light tips was evaluated before and after treatment and after their use and disinfection. The influence of a plastic protective barrier over the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity of resin composites were also analyzed. Microbiological sampling was conducted at initial contamination (T0), in Log 10 CFU/4 mL; after dental treatment (T1); and after disinfection with 70% ethanol (v/v) (T2). The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. The flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity analyses were performed using bar-shaped test specimens of three commercial resin composites with and without barriers, and the tests were subjected to a statistical normality test. Turbidity was observed in the media in 60.7% of the tubes at T0, 100.0% at T1, and 57.1% at T2. The microbial contamination was similar at T0 and T2, but a significant increase was observed at T1. The recovered microbial load differed significantly between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05). The results of the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity analyses showed no significant differences with or without a barrier for any of the different colors of resin, polymerization time, or the three resins. Under the present experimental conditions, 70% ethanol significantly reduced the levels of microbial contamination, but it did not guarantee the inactivation of all microbial cells. The use of plastic protective barriers did not alter the flexural strength or the modulus of elasticity of any of the tested resin composites, indicating that they are a safe and viable measure to prevent cross-contamination when using a dental curing light.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"39 ","pages":"e085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contamination of dental curing light tips was evaluated before and after treatment and after their use and disinfection. The influence of a plastic protective barrier over the flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity of resin composites were also analyzed. Microbiological sampling was conducted at initial contamination (T0), in Log 10 CFU/4 mL; after dental treatment (T1); and after disinfection with 70% ethanol (v/v) (T2). The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and analysis of variance. The flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity analyses were performed using bar-shaped test specimens of three commercial resin composites with and without barriers, and the tests were subjected to a statistical normality test. Turbidity was observed in the media in 60.7% of the tubes at T0, 100.0% at T1, and 57.1% at T2. The microbial contamination was similar at T0 and T2, but a significant increase was observed at T1. The recovered microbial load differed significantly between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05). The results of the flexural strength and modulus of elasticity analyses showed no significant differences with or without a barrier for any of the different colors of resin, polymerization time, or the three resins. Under the present experimental conditions, 70% ethanol significantly reduced the levels of microbial contamination, but it did not guarantee the inactivation of all microbial cells. The use of plastic protective barriers did not alter the flexural strength or the modulus of elasticity of any of the tested resin composites, indicating that they are a safe and viable measure to prevent cross-contamination when using a dental curing light.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估牙科固化灯的微生物负荷和树脂复合材料保护屏障的影响。
对治疗前后、使用及消毒后的牙科光尖进行污染评价。分析了塑料保护层对树脂复合材料抗弯强度和弹性模量的影响。在初始污染(T0)时进行微生物采样,采样量为Log 10 CFU/4 mL;牙科治疗后(T1);70%乙醇(v/v) (T2)消毒后。采用描述性统计和方差分析对结果进行分析。采用三种商用树脂复合材料的条形试件进行了抗折强度和弹性模量分析,并进行了统计正态性检验。60.7%的试管在T0、100.0% T1和57.1% T2时培养基浑浊。微生物污染在T0和T2时基本一致,但在T1时明显增加。T1和T2的微生物回收率差异显著(p < 0.05)。抗弯强度和弹性模量分析的结果显示,有或没有屏障的任何不同颜色的树脂,聚合时间,或三种树脂的显著差异。在本实验条件下,70%乙醇显著降低了微生物污染水平,但并不能保证所有微生物细胞的失活。使用塑料防护屏障不会改变任何测试树脂复合材料的弯曲强度或弹性模量,这表明在使用牙科固化光时,它们是一种安全可行的防止交叉污染的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信