Factors Influencing Bile Leakage and Incisional Infection Post Choledocholithotomy: An Analysis Based on 621 Patients.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jie Gao, Jun Chen, Xing Huang, Yiping Zheng, Yao Wei, Yufeng Shen
{"title":"Factors Influencing Bile Leakage and Incisional Infection Post Choledocholithotomy: An Analysis Based on 621 Patients.","authors":"Jie Gao, Jun Chen, Xing Huang, Yiping Zheng, Yao Wei, Yufeng Shen","doi":"10.1159/000548103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bile leakage occurred in 60 patients (9.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that open surgery (OR = 1.672), acute biliary inflammation (OR = 2.469), advanced age (OR = 1.061), continuous suturing (OR = 4.991), prolonged operative time (OR = 1.005), and bile pathogen infection (OR = 2.37) were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Among 181 patients who underwent open or converted surgery, 40 (22.1%) developed incisional infections. Independent risk factors for incisional infection included advanced age (OR = 1.055), prolonged operation time (OR = 1.006), elevated postoperative WBC count within 24 hours (OR = 1.149), emergency surgery (OR = 3.745), longer incision length (OR = 1.141), and postoperative bile leakage (OR = 14.027) (all P < 0.05), indicating a strong association between bile leakage and subsequent wound infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open surgery, acute inflammation, older age, continuous suturing, and intra-biliary infection significantly increase the risk of postoperative bile leakage. Moreover, bile leakage was identified as a strong independent predictor of incisional infection. In addition, prolonged operative time, elevated early postoperative leukocyte count, emergency surgery, and longer incisions were also associated with increased infection risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12222,"journal":{"name":"European Surgical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To identify independent risk factors for bile leakage and incisional infection after choledocholithotomy and to explore the potential association between bile leakage and incisional infection.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 621 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open choledocholithotomy combined with cholecystectomy between January 2017 and October 2024. Clinical data were collected, and univariate analysis followed by binary logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative bile leakage and incisional infection.

Results: Bile leakage occurred in 60 patients (9.7%). Multivariate analysis showed that open surgery (OR = 1.672), acute biliary inflammation (OR = 2.469), advanced age (OR = 1.061), continuous suturing (OR = 4.991), prolonged operative time (OR = 1.005), and bile pathogen infection (OR = 2.37) were independent risk factors (all P < 0.05). Among 181 patients who underwent open or converted surgery, 40 (22.1%) developed incisional infections. Independent risk factors for incisional infection included advanced age (OR = 1.055), prolonged operation time (OR = 1.006), elevated postoperative WBC count within 24 hours (OR = 1.149), emergency surgery (OR = 3.745), longer incision length (OR = 1.141), and postoperative bile leakage (OR = 14.027) (all P < 0.05), indicating a strong association between bile leakage and subsequent wound infection.

Conclusion: Open surgery, acute inflammation, older age, continuous suturing, and intra-biliary infection significantly increase the risk of postoperative bile leakage. Moreover, bile leakage was identified as a strong independent predictor of incisional infection. In addition, prolonged operative time, elevated early postoperative leukocyte count, emergency surgery, and longer incisions were also associated with increased infection risk.

621例胆总管取石术后胆漏及切口感染的影响因素分析
目的:探讨胆总管取石术后胆漏及切口感染的独立危险因素,探讨胆漏与切口感染的潜在关系。方法:对2017年1月至2024年10月期间行腹腔镜或开放式胆总管取石联合胆囊切除术的621例患者进行回顾性研究。收集临床资料,采用单因素分析和二元logistic回归分析,确定术后胆漏和切口感染的独立危险因素。结果:发生胆漏60例(9.7%)。多因素分析显示,开放性手术(OR = 1.672)、急性胆道炎症(OR = 2.469)、高龄(OR = 1.061)、持续缝合(OR = 4.991)、手术时间延长(OR = 1.005)、胆汁病原体感染(OR = 2.37)是独立危险因素(均P < 0.05)。在181例接受开放或转换手术的患者中,40例(22.1%)发生切口感染。切口感染的独立危险因素包括高龄(OR = 1.055)、手术时间延长(OR = 1.006)、术后24小时内WBC计数升高(OR = 1.149)、急诊手术(OR = 3.745)、切口长度较长(OR = 1.141)、术后胆漏(OR = 14.027)(均P < 0.05),提示胆漏与后续伤口感染有较强的相关性。结论:开放性手术、急性炎症、高龄、持续缝合、胆道内感染均显著增加术后胆漏的发生风险。此外,胆漏被认为是切口感染的一个强有力的独立预测因素。此外,延长手术时间、术后早期白细胞计数升高、急诊手术和较长的切口也与感染风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Surgical Research'' features original clinical and experimental papers, condensed reviews of new knowledge relevant to surgical research, and short technical notes serving the information needs of investigators in various fields of operative medicine. Coverage includes surgery, surgical pathophysiology, drug usage, and new surgical techniques. Special consideration is given to information on the use of animal models, physiological and biological methods as well as biophysical measuring and recording systems. The journal is of particular value for workers interested in pathophysiologic concepts, new techniques and in how these can be introduced into clinical work or applied when critical decisions are made concerning the use of new procedures or drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信