From mazes to automation: Modernizing working memory research in animal models

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Eghlima Razeghian , Ehsan Rezayat
{"title":"From mazes to automation: Modernizing working memory research in animal models","authors":"Eghlima Razeghian ,&nbsp;Ehsan Rezayat","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Working memory (WM) is a core cognitive mechanism necessary for adaptive behavior. In the last few decades, scientists have studied WM using rodent models through traditional and time-consuming approaches, such as the Radial Arm Maze and the T-Maze. While these traditional tools have presented fundamental understanding, their dependence on manual operations restrains experimental precision and scalability. Here, we refine how emerging automated technologies—such as touchscreens, virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI)—are inspiring this field by allowing high-throughput testing with improved precision. Further, we present a new framework to evaluate both classic and modern tasks based on their Scalability, Precision, and Neural Compatibility. This evaluation underlines how automation allows the emergence of modern paradigms, such as the Pulse-Based Accumulation Task and the Trial-Unique Nonmatching-to-Location (TUNL) task, offering more precise assessments of WM. Such technological progressions not only boost data quality and mitigate the efforts involved in data collection but also make way for a more unified understanding of the neural processes that underlie working memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 115806"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825003936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a core cognitive mechanism necessary for adaptive behavior. In the last few decades, scientists have studied WM using rodent models through traditional and time-consuming approaches, such as the Radial Arm Maze and the T-Maze. While these traditional tools have presented fundamental understanding, their dependence on manual operations restrains experimental precision and scalability. Here, we refine how emerging automated technologies—such as touchscreens, virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI)—are inspiring this field by allowing high-throughput testing with improved precision. Further, we present a new framework to evaluate both classic and modern tasks based on their Scalability, Precision, and Neural Compatibility. This evaluation underlines how automation allows the emergence of modern paradigms, such as the Pulse-Based Accumulation Task and the Trial-Unique Nonmatching-to-Location (TUNL) task, offering more precise assessments of WM. Such technological progressions not only boost data quality and mitigate the efforts involved in data collection but also make way for a more unified understanding of the neural processes that underlie working memory.
从迷宫到自动化:动物模型工作记忆研究的现代化。
工作记忆是适应性行为所必需的核心认知机制。在过去的几十年里,科学家们通过传统和耗时的方法,如径向臂迷宫和t形迷宫,使用啮齿动物模型研究WM。虽然这些传统工具已经提供了基本的理解,但它们对人工操作的依赖限制了实验的精度和可扩展性。在这里,我们细化了新兴的自动化技术-如触摸屏,虚拟现实(VR)和人工智能(AI)-如何通过提高精度的高通量测试来启发这一领域。此外,我们提出了一个新的框架来评估经典和现代任务基于其可扩展性,精度和神经兼容性。这一评估强调了自动化如何允许现代范例的出现,例如基于脉冲的积累任务和试验唯一非匹配到位置(TUNL)任务,提供更精确的WM评估。这样的技术进步不仅提高了数据质量,减轻了数据收集的工作量,而且为更统一地理解工作记忆背后的神经过程铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信