Determinants of geographic variation in the incidence of adult nonmalignant meningioma in the United States, 2010–2019

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI:10.1002/cncr.70042
Diana R. Withrow PhD, Joseph Boyle PhD, Martha S. Linet MD, MPH, Christine A. Pittman Ballard MPH, Gino Cioffi MPH, Carol Kruchko BA, Donald L. Miller MD, Valentina I. Petkov MD, MPH, Mackenzie Price MPH, Kristin Waite PhD, Quinn T. Ostrom PhD, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan PhD
{"title":"Determinants of geographic variation in the incidence of adult nonmalignant meningioma in the United States, 2010–2019","authors":"Diana R. Withrow PhD,&nbsp;Joseph Boyle PhD,&nbsp;Martha S. Linet MD, MPH,&nbsp;Christine A. Pittman Ballard MPH,&nbsp;Gino Cioffi MPH,&nbsp;Carol Kruchko BA,&nbsp;Donald L. Miller MD,&nbsp;Valentina I. Petkov MD, MPH,&nbsp;Mackenzie Price MPH,&nbsp;Kristin Waite PhD,&nbsp;Quinn T. Ostrom PhD,&nbsp;Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>US incidence rates of nonmalignant brain tumors are 3-fold higher in highest versus lowest incidence states. A county-level analysis was conducted to assess whether geographic variation in nonmalignant meningioma (NMM) incidence is related to demographics, cancer registry, health care, and other factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Age-adjusted incidence rates of NMM in US counties during 2010–2019 were modeled with data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States. Demographic, geographic, cancer registry, environmental, health care, health, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors at the county level were drawn from numerous data sources. Bayesian index regression models were fit containing spatial random effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three domains were significantly associated with rates of NMM at the county level: cancer registry practices (funding source and % radiographically confirmed), socioeconomic status index (higher levels with percent working in white-collar occupations as an important contributor), and demographics (% Black and % female). No associations were observed for general health or environmental factors. In the fully adjusted model, the number of counties with significantly elevated and lowered spatial random effects decreased by 33% and 28%, respectively, compared to a no-covariate model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although general health and environmental factors cannot be ruled out in explaining the geographic variation in NMM incidence rates, results suggest that socioeconomic factors, certain demographic characteristics, and cancer diagnosis and registry practices may all play a significant role in driving such variation. These results may have implications for other tumor types diagnosed primarily radiographically or outside hospital settings, where variation in detection and reporting may affect incidence rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.70042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

US incidence rates of nonmalignant brain tumors are 3-fold higher in highest versus lowest incidence states. A county-level analysis was conducted to assess whether geographic variation in nonmalignant meningioma (NMM) incidence is related to demographics, cancer registry, health care, and other factors.

Methods

Age-adjusted incidence rates of NMM in US counties during 2010–2019 were modeled with data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States. Demographic, geographic, cancer registry, environmental, health care, health, lifestyle, and socioeconomic factors at the county level were drawn from numerous data sources. Bayesian index regression models were fit containing spatial random effects.

Results

Three domains were significantly associated with rates of NMM at the county level: cancer registry practices (funding source and % radiographically confirmed), socioeconomic status index (higher levels with percent working in white-collar occupations as an important contributor), and demographics (% Black and % female). No associations were observed for general health or environmental factors. In the fully adjusted model, the number of counties with significantly elevated and lowered spatial random effects decreased by 33% and 28%, respectively, compared to a no-covariate model.

Conclusions

Although general health and environmental factors cannot be ruled out in explaining the geographic variation in NMM incidence rates, results suggest that socioeconomic factors, certain demographic characteristics, and cancer diagnosis and registry practices may all play a significant role in driving such variation. These results may have implications for other tumor types diagnosed primarily radiographically or outside hospital settings, where variation in detection and reporting may affect incidence rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

2010-2019年美国成人非恶性脑膜瘤发病率地理差异的决定因素
背景:美国非恶性脑肿瘤的发病率在发病率最高的州比发病率最低的州高3倍。我们进行了一项县级分析,以评估非恶性脑膜瘤(NMM)发病率的地理差异是否与人口统计学、癌症登记、卫生保健和其他因素有关。方法:使用美国中央脑肿瘤登记处的数据,对2010-2019年美国各县经年龄调整的NMM发病率进行建模。县一级的人口、地理、癌症登记、环境、保健、健康、生活方式和社会经济因素来自众多数据来源。拟合了包含空间随机效应的贝叶斯指数回归模型。结果:三个领域与县一级的NMM率显著相关:癌症登记实践(资金来源和放射学证实的百分比),社会经济地位指数(较高水平,白领职业的百分比作为重要贡献者)和人口统计学(黑人和女性百分比)。没有观察到与一般健康或环境因素相关。在完全调整后的模型中,与无协变量模型相比,空间随机效应显著升高和显著降低的县分别减少了33%和28%。结论:虽然在解释NMM发病率的地理差异时不能排除一般的健康和环境因素,但结果表明,社会经济因素、某些人口统计学特征以及癌症诊断和登记实践都可能在驱动这种差异方面发挥重要作用。这些结果可能对其他主要通过放射学或医院外诊断的肿瘤类型有启示,在这些类型中,检测和报告的差异可能会影响发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信