Carla M Perissinotto,Katrina Hough,Soe Han Tha,Bri Matusovsky,Danielle Escueta,Preston Burnes,Ashwin A Kotwal
{"title":"Implementing a telephone-based support program to address loneliness in older adults.","authors":"Carla M Perissinotto,Katrina Hough,Soe Han Tha,Bri Matusovsky,Danielle Escueta,Preston Burnes,Ashwin A Kotwal","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social isolation and loneliness are key social determinants of health linked to poor outcomes. While telephone-based support programs have some evidence, their implementation remains understudied. We evaluated the Friendship Line, a 24-h telephone-based support program for older adults, using an implementation science lens. This included structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with staff (N = 13), volunteers (N = 17), and older adult callers (N = 27), totaling 57 participants. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Six key features were identified for the success of telephone-based loneliness support programs: (1) fostering trust and reliability through 24-h access; (2) creating a safe and nonjudgmental space; (3) ensuring consistency and relationship building; (4) balancing stability and adaptability during changes; (5) securing ongoing funding; and (6) providing specialized training focused on loneliness and aging. These programmatic features contributed to caller satisfaction, reduced loneliness, and improved connectedness. Effective and sustainable telephone-support lines addressing social isolation and loneliness require multifactorial strategies, including skill development, robust organizational infrastructure, and tailored training to meet the diverse needs of callers.","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Social isolation and loneliness are key social determinants of health linked to poor outcomes. While telephone-based support programs have some evidence, their implementation remains understudied. We evaluated the Friendship Line, a 24-h telephone-based support program for older adults, using an implementation science lens. This included structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with staff (N = 13), volunteers (N = 17), and older adult callers (N = 27), totaling 57 participants. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically and mapped onto the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Six key features were identified for the success of telephone-based loneliness support programs: (1) fostering trust and reliability through 24-h access; (2) creating a safe and nonjudgmental space; (3) ensuring consistency and relationship building; (4) balancing stability and adaptability during changes; (5) securing ongoing funding; and (6) providing specialized training focused on loneliness and aging. These programmatic features contributed to caller satisfaction, reduced loneliness, and improved connectedness. Effective and sustainable telephone-support lines addressing social isolation and loneliness require multifactorial strategies, including skill development, robust organizational infrastructure, and tailored training to meet the diverse needs of callers.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.