Kinnison Edmunds, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, John Nusstein, Al Reader
{"title":"Virtual Reality Distraction vs Nitrous Oxide for Reducing Anxiety and Injection Pain.","authors":"Kinnison Edmunds, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, John Nusstein, Al Reader","doi":"10.2344/24-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare nitrous oxide (N2O) vs virtual reality (VR) as methods for reducing pain and anxiety during a dental injection. The primary objectives were to assess acute changes in stress responses by comparing salivary cortisol levels between the 2 groups and differences in injection pain scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 132 female subjects serving as their own control received maxillary lateral incisor infiltration injections with the use of either N2O or a VR headset during separate appointments spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Salivary cortisol samples were collected at 6 times throughout each appointment. Pain scores for needle insertion and solution deposition were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically using Wald and paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N2O significantly lowered salivary cortisol concentrations and subsequent physiologic anxiety as compared with VR (P = .0089). However, no significant differences in needle insertion or solution deposition pain scores were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although VR and N2O may be comparable in terms of perceived pain reduction, N2O was a more effective method than VR for physiologic analgesia and anxiolysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94296,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"72 3","pages":"143-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12418352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/24-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare nitrous oxide (N2O) vs virtual reality (VR) as methods for reducing pain and anxiety during a dental injection. The primary objectives were to assess acute changes in stress responses by comparing salivary cortisol levels between the 2 groups and differences in injection pain scores.
Methods: A total of 132 female subjects serving as their own control received maxillary lateral incisor infiltration injections with the use of either N2O or a VR headset during separate appointments spaced at least 2 weeks apart. Salivary cortisol samples were collected at 6 times throughout each appointment. Pain scores for needle insertion and solution deposition were recorded. Data were analyzed statistically using Wald and paired t tests.
Results: N2O significantly lowered salivary cortisol concentrations and subsequent physiologic anxiety as compared with VR (P = .0089). However, no significant differences in needle insertion or solution deposition pain scores were found.
Conclusion: Although VR and N2O may be comparable in terms of perceived pain reduction, N2O was a more effective method than VR for physiologic analgesia and anxiolysis.