Influence of Negative Attentional Bias on Self-Management and Health-Promoting Behaviors in Orthopedic Patients with Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.
{"title":"Influence of Negative Attentional Bias on Self-Management and Health-Promoting Behaviors in Orthopedic Patients with Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.","authors":"Su-Feng Yin, Fei-Fei Bian, Hai-Xia Li","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S543408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the status of negative information attentional bias, self-management, and health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic refractory wounds receiving orthopedic care. Additionally, the study sought to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to evaluate the influence of negative attentional bias on self-management and health-promoting behaviors, with the intent of informing the clinical implementation of evidence-based health behavior education programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 226 patients with chronic refractory wounds under orthopedic treatment at a single institution between January 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire, the Chronic Disease Self-Management Scale (CDSMS), and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to assess associations among negative attentional bias, self-management, and health-promoting behaviors. SEM using Amos 21.0 was conducted to examine potential mediating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health-promoting behaviors demonstrated a positive correlation with self-management and a negative correlation with negative attentional bias. Furthermore, self-management was negatively correlated with negative attentional bias (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). SEM indicated that negative attentional bias partially mediated the relationship between self-management and health-promoting behaviors, accounting for 31.65% of the total effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Negative attentional bias mediates the association between self-management and health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic refractory wounds receiving orthopedic care. These findings suggest that enhancing self-management may improve engagement in health-promoting behaviors by reducing the influence of negative attentional bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2899-2908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S543408","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the status of negative information attentional bias, self-management, and health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic refractory wounds receiving orthopedic care. Additionally, the study sought to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to evaluate the influence of negative attentional bias on self-management and health-promoting behaviors, with the intent of informing the clinical implementation of evidence-based health behavior education programs.
Methods: A total of 226 patients with chronic refractory wounds under orthopedic treatment at a single institution between January 2020 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Negative Cognitive Processing Bias Questionnaire, the Chronic Disease Self-Management Scale (CDSMS), and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II). Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to assess associations among negative attentional bias, self-management, and health-promoting behaviors. SEM using Amos 21.0 was conducted to examine potential mediating effects.
Results: Health-promoting behaviors demonstrated a positive correlation with self-management and a negative correlation with negative attentional bias. Furthermore, self-management was negatively correlated with negative attentional bias (all p < 0.05). SEM indicated that negative attentional bias partially mediated the relationship between self-management and health-promoting behaviors, accounting for 31.65% of the total effect.
Conclusion: Negative attentional bias mediates the association between self-management and health-promoting behaviors among patients with chronic refractory wounds receiving orthopedic care. These findings suggest that enhancing self-management may improve engagement in health-promoting behaviors by reducing the influence of negative attentional bias.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.