Antibiotic awareness: exploring knowledge among culturally and linguistically diverse patients.

Kylie Tran, Vinushan Kuganathan, Jessica Lam, Aqsa Rana, Serine Yau, Katherine Lee, Ravindra Dotel, Chin-Yen Yeo, Ronald L Castelino
{"title":"Antibiotic awareness: exploring knowledge among culturally and linguistically diverse patients.","authors":"Kylie Tran, Vinushan Kuganathan, Jessica Lam, Aqsa Rana, Serine Yau, Katherine Lee, Ravindra Dotel, Chin-Yen Yeo, Ronald L Castelino","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs must address the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients who often experience language barriers and varying cultural beliefs regarding antibiotics. They are at greater risk of receiving suboptimal or inappropriate care, yet guidance to support AMS practices for this population remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate antibiotic knowledge, perspectives, and experiences of CALD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May to November 2023 at a Western Sydney tertiary hospital. Adult patients of CALD background on systemic antibiotics for more than 72 hours under surgical, respiratory, and geriatric specialties were surveyed on their understanding of their antibiotic treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 177 patients, median age was 70 years old (21-99 years), and 95/177 (53.7%) were males. Of the 177 patients, 171/177 (96.6%) reported speaking a language other than English at home. While 160/177 (90.4%) patients were told that they were treated with antibiotics, only 67/177 (37.9%) were told about duration, 35/177 (19.8%) were told about the side effects, and 27/177 (15.3%) were given written information. Information was provided by doctors to 125/177 (70.6%) patients, 72/177 (40.7%) by nurses, and 3/177 (1.7%) by pharmacists. Patients preferred to have received information from their doctor 79/177 (44.6%) or any healthcare professional 91/177 (51.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving antibiotic education for CALD patients is essential to address communication gaps. Enhancing knowledge will support appropriate use, improved adherence and outcomes, and promote shared decision-making. Strengthening health literacy in CALD populations should be a priority for AMS programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415797/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs must address the needs of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) patients who often experience language barriers and varying cultural beliefs regarding antibiotics. They are at greater risk of receiving suboptimal or inappropriate care, yet guidance to support AMS practices for this population remains limited.

Aim: To investigate antibiotic knowledge, perspectives, and experiences of CALD patients.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May to November 2023 at a Western Sydney tertiary hospital. Adult patients of CALD background on systemic antibiotics for more than 72 hours under surgical, respiratory, and geriatric specialties were surveyed on their understanding of their antibiotic treatment.

Results: Of the 177 patients, median age was 70 years old (21-99 years), and 95/177 (53.7%) were males. Of the 177 patients, 171/177 (96.6%) reported speaking a language other than English at home. While 160/177 (90.4%) patients were told that they were treated with antibiotics, only 67/177 (37.9%) were told about duration, 35/177 (19.8%) were told about the side effects, and 27/177 (15.3%) were given written information. Information was provided by doctors to 125/177 (70.6%) patients, 72/177 (40.7%) by nurses, and 3/177 (1.7%) by pharmacists. Patients preferred to have received information from their doctor 79/177 (44.6%) or any healthcare professional 91/177 (51.4%).

Conclusion: Improving antibiotic education for CALD patients is essential to address communication gaps. Enhancing knowledge will support appropriate use, improved adherence and outcomes, and promote shared decision-making. Strengthening health literacy in CALD populations should be a priority for AMS programs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗生素意识:探索不同文化和语言患者的知识。
背景:有效的抗菌素管理(AMS)项目必须满足文化和语言多样性(CALD)患者的需求,这些患者经常遇到语言障碍和对抗生素的不同文化信仰。他们接受次优或不适当护理的风险更大,但支持这一人群的辅助医疗服务实践的指导仍然有限。目的:了解CALD患者的抗生素知识、观点和经验。方法:于2023年5月至11月在西悉尼三级医院进行横断面调查。调查了外科、呼吸和老年专科有全身抗生素治疗背景超过72小时的CALD成年患者对抗生素治疗的了解情况。结果:177例患者中位年龄70岁(21 ~ 99岁),男性95/177(53.7%)。在177例患者中,171/177(96.6%)报告在家中使用英语以外的语言。160/177(90.4%)的患者被告知他们正在使用抗生素,只有67/177(37.9%)的患者被告知持续时间,35/177(19.8%)的患者被告知副作用,27/177(15.3%)的患者被告知书面信息。医生提供信息的占125/177(70.6%),护士提供信息的占72/177(40.7%),药剂师提供信息的占3/177(1.7%)。患者倾向于从他们的医生79/177(44.6%)或任何医疗保健专业人员91/177(51.4%)处获得信息。结论:加强对CALD患者的抗生素教育是解决沟通差距的关键。加强知识将支持适当使用,改善依从性和结果,并促进共同决策。加强CALD人群的健康素养应该是辅助医疗服务项目的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信