Stewardship opportunities in peripartum infections: a review of quality improvement initiatives and future directions.

Pamela Bailey, Grace Pazienza, Alexia Foy-Crowder, Lance Schacht, Mattie Jo Thomas, Joseph Kohn, Sarah Withers, Jessica Britt, Sean Stuart, Amy Crockett
{"title":"Stewardship opportunities in peripartum infections: a review of quality improvement initiatives and future directions.","authors":"Pamela Bailey, Grace Pazienza, Alexia Foy-Crowder, Lance Schacht, Mattie Jo Thomas, Joseph Kohn, Sarah Withers, Jessica Britt, Sean Stuart, Amy Crockett","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.10121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent public health threat, and despite significant consumption of antimicrobials in pregnancy, there remain opportunities for improvement of their use in the obstetric population. Improvement in antimicrobial utilization can be streamlined by assessing baseline characteristics, utilization of diagnostic testing, awareness of peripartum protocols, and recognition of penicillin allergies. In a single healthcare system including 8 obstetric hospitals, an administrative review identified 199 different regimens used among 8,528 patients based on American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. Other notable factors include 65.6% of patients having no cultures obtained despite being started on empiric antibiotics, duplicative coverage when multiple clinical scenarios overlap, and a high incidence of reported penicillin allergies with obstetric providers lacking comfort to reconcile and de-label allergies. By reviewing these individual aspects, this can highlight opportunities for improvement of antimicrobial use and stewardship in obstetric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.10121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent public health threat, and despite significant consumption of antimicrobials in pregnancy, there remain opportunities for improvement of their use in the obstetric population. Improvement in antimicrobial utilization can be streamlined by assessing baseline characteristics, utilization of diagnostic testing, awareness of peripartum protocols, and recognition of penicillin allergies. In a single healthcare system including 8 obstetric hospitals, an administrative review identified 199 different regimens used among 8,528 patients based on American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists (ACOG) guidelines. Other notable factors include 65.6% of patients having no cultures obtained despite being started on empiric antibiotics, duplicative coverage when multiple clinical scenarios overlap, and a high incidence of reported penicillin allergies with obstetric providers lacking comfort to reconcile and de-label allergies. By reviewing these individual aspects, this can highlight opportunities for improvement of antimicrobial use and stewardship in obstetric populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

围产期感染的管理机会:质量改进举措和未来方向的回顾。
抗菌素耐药性是一项紧迫的公共卫生威胁,尽管妊娠期间大量使用抗菌素,但仍有机会改善产科人口对抗菌素的使用。通过评估基线特征、诊断测试的使用、对围产期方案的了解以及对青霉素过敏的认识,可以简化抗菌药物使用的改善。在包括8家产科医院在内的单一医疗保健系统中,根据美国妇产科学院(ACOG)指南,一项行政审查确定了8,528名患者使用的199种不同方案。其他值得注意的因素包括65.6%的患者尽管开始使用经验性抗生素,但仍未获得培养物,当多种临床情况重叠时,重复覆盖,以及报告的青霉素过敏发生率高,产科提供者缺乏安慰来协调和取消过敏标签。通过审查这些个别方面,可以突出在产科人群中改进抗微生物药物使用和管理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信