Causally Sound Priors for Binary Experiments.

IF 2.5 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Nicholas J Irons, Carlos Cinelli
{"title":"Causally Sound Priors for Binary Experiments.","authors":"Nicholas J Irons, Carlos Cinelli","doi":"10.1214/25-BA1506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We introduce the BREASE framework for the Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials with binary treatment and outcome. Approaching the problem from a causal inference perspective, we propose parameterizing the likelihood in terms of the <b>b</b>aseline <b>r</b>isk, <b>e</b>fficacy, and <b>a</b>dverse <b>s</b>ide <b>e</b>ffects of the treatment, along with a flexible, yet intuitive and tractable jointly independent beta prior distribution on these parameters, which we show to be a generalization of the Dirichlet prior for the joint distribution of potential outcomes. Our approach has a number of desirable characteristics when compared to current mainstream alternatives: (i) it naturally induces prior dependence between expected outcomes in the treatment and control groups; (ii) as the baseline risk, efficacy and risk of adverse side effects are quantities commonly present in the clinicians' vocabulary, the hyperparameters of the prior are directly interpretable, thus facilitating the elicitation of prior knowledge and sensitivity analysis; and (iii) we provide analytical formulae for the marginal likelihood, Bayes factor, and other posterior quantities, as well as an exact posterior sampling algorithm and an accurate and fast data-augmented Gibbs sampler in cases where traditional MCMC fails. Empirical examples demonstrate the utility of our methods for estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/25-BA1506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce the BREASE framework for the Bayesian analysis of randomized controlled trials with binary treatment and outcome. Approaching the problem from a causal inference perspective, we propose parameterizing the likelihood in terms of the baseline risk, efficacy, and adverse side effects of the treatment, along with a flexible, yet intuitive and tractable jointly independent beta prior distribution on these parameters, which we show to be a generalization of the Dirichlet prior for the joint distribution of potential outcomes. Our approach has a number of desirable characteristics when compared to current mainstream alternatives: (i) it naturally induces prior dependence between expected outcomes in the treatment and control groups; (ii) as the baseline risk, efficacy and risk of adverse side effects are quantities commonly present in the clinicians' vocabulary, the hyperparameters of the prior are directly interpretable, thus facilitating the elicitation of prior knowledge and sensitivity analysis; and (iii) we provide analytical formulae for the marginal likelihood, Bayes factor, and other posterior quantities, as well as an exact posterior sampling algorithm and an accurate and fast data-augmented Gibbs sampler in cases where traditional MCMC fails. Empirical examples demonstrate the utility of our methods for estimation, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity analysis of treatment effects.

二元实验的因果合理先验。
我们引入BREASE框架,对具有二元治疗和结果的随机对照试验进行贝叶斯分析。从因果推理的角度来解决这个问题,我们提出了参数化治疗的基线风险、疗效和不良副作用的可能性,以及这些参数的灵活、直观和易于处理的联合独立beta先验分布,我们认为这是Dirichlet先验对潜在结果联合分布的推广。与目前的主流替代方法相比,我们的方法具有许多可取的特征:(i)它自然地诱导了治疗组和对照组预期结果之间的先验依赖性;(ii)由于基线风险、疗效和不良副作用风险是临床医生词汇中常见的量,先验的超参数是可直接解释的,从而便于先验知识的提取和敏感性分析;(iii)在传统MCMC失效的情况下,我们提供了边际似然、贝叶斯因子和其他后验量的解析公式,以及精确的后验抽样算法和准确快速的数据增强吉布斯采样器。实证例子证明了我们的方法在估计、假设检验和治疗效果敏感性分析方面的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bayesian Analysis
Bayesian Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining. Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信