Quantitative MRI Dixon signal drop and fat fraction for differentiating bone marrow lesions: a two-center prospective analysis.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yassir Edrees Almalki, Marwa Fathy Khalil, Ahmed Mohamed Alsowey, Hazem Ibrahim Aly Tantawy, Mohamed Gaber Hamed, Shimaa Abdelmoneem, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Ziyad A Almushayti, Shaker Hassan S Alshehri, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha
{"title":"Quantitative MRI Dixon signal drop and fat fraction for differentiating bone marrow lesions: a two-center prospective analysis.","authors":"Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Yassir Edrees Almalki, Marwa Fathy Khalil, Ahmed Mohamed Alsowey, Hazem Ibrahim Aly Tantawy, Mohamed Gaber Hamed, Shimaa Abdelmoneem, Sharifa Khalid Alduraibi, Ziyad A Almushayti, Shaker Hassan S Alshehri, Ahmed M Abdelkhalik Basha, Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha","doi":"10.1186/s41747-025-00615-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone marrow (BM) lesion differentiation remains challenging, and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may enhance accuracy over conventional methods. We evaluated the diagnostic value and inter-reader reliability of Dixon-based signal drop (%drop) and fat fraction percentage (%fat) as adjuncts to existing protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective two-center study, 172 patients with BM signal abnormalities underwent standardized 1.5-T MRI protocols, including Dixon sequences. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated images and performed quantitative measurements of %drop and %fat. Final diagnoses were established through histopathology (n = 96) or imaging follow-up (n = 76). Diagnostic value was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), inter-reader reliability using Cohen's κ coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consensus optimal cutoff was for %drop ≤ 19.8%, yielding 87.2% accuracy, 95.3% sensitivity, and 73.8% specificity, and that for %fat was ≤ 18.3%, achieving 86.6% accuracy, 96.3% sensitivity, and 70.8% specificity. Both metrics showed high diagnostic performance (AUROC 0.824-0.863) and excellent inter-reader reliability (κ > 0.93, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% as the strongest independent predictors of malignancy, with odds ratio (OR) being 9.38 and 8.85, respectively (p < 0.001). Signal characteristics on Dixon sequences provided additional diagnostic value, with signal voids on fat-only images (OR 7.14) and high signals on water-only images (OR 5.46).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative MRI Dixon imaging parameters demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-reader reliability in differentiating benign and malignant BM lesions, supporting their implementation in clinical practice protocols as a reproducible adjunct to conventional MRI.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Quantitative Dixon MRI provides reproducible, noninvasive differentiation of bone marrow lesions with high diagnostic accuracy across anatomical sites, enhancing clinical decision-making with standardized thresholds while demonstrating excellent inter-center consistency.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Quantitative Dixon MRI thresholds of %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% were established as reliable predictors of malignancy in bone marrow lesions. Dixon metrics demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (86.6-87.2%), compared to conventional T1-weighted sequences (79.2%). Excellent inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.895-0.943) supports the reproducibility of quantitative Dixon MRI in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00615-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone marrow (BM) lesion differentiation remains challenging, and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may enhance accuracy over conventional methods. We evaluated the diagnostic value and inter-reader reliability of Dixon-based signal drop (%drop) and fat fraction percentage (%fat) as adjuncts to existing protocols.

Materials and methods: In this prospective two-center study, 172 patients with BM signal abnormalities underwent standardized 1.5-T MRI protocols, including Dixon sequences. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated images and performed quantitative measurements of %drop and %fat. Final diagnoses were established through histopathology (n = 96) or imaging follow-up (n = 76). Diagnostic value was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), inter-reader reliability using Cohen's κ coefficient.

Results: The consensus optimal cutoff was for %drop ≤ 19.8%, yielding 87.2% accuracy, 95.3% sensitivity, and 73.8% specificity, and that for %fat was ≤ 18.3%, achieving 86.6% accuracy, 96.3% sensitivity, and 70.8% specificity. Both metrics showed high diagnostic performance (AUROC 0.824-0.863) and excellent inter-reader reliability (κ > 0.93, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% as the strongest independent predictors of malignancy, with odds ratio (OR) being 9.38 and 8.85, respectively (p < 0.001). Signal characteristics on Dixon sequences provided additional diagnostic value, with signal voids on fat-only images (OR 7.14) and high signals on water-only images (OR 5.46).

Conclusion: Quantitative MRI Dixon imaging parameters demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent inter-reader reliability in differentiating benign and malignant BM lesions, supporting their implementation in clinical practice protocols as a reproducible adjunct to conventional MRI.

Relevance statement: Quantitative Dixon MRI provides reproducible, noninvasive differentiation of bone marrow lesions with high diagnostic accuracy across anatomical sites, enhancing clinical decision-making with standardized thresholds while demonstrating excellent inter-center consistency.

Key points: Quantitative Dixon MRI thresholds of %drop ≤ 19.8% and %fat ≤ 18.3% were established as reliable predictors of malignancy in bone marrow lesions. Dixon metrics demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy (86.6-87.2%), compared to conventional T1-weighted sequences (79.2%). Excellent inter-reader reliability (κ = 0.895-0.943) supports the reproducibility of quantitative Dixon MRI in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

定量MRI Dixon信号下降和脂肪分数用于鉴别骨髓病变:一项双中心前瞻性分析。
背景:骨髓(BM)病变鉴别仍然具有挑战性,定量磁共振成像(MRI)可能比传统方法提高准确性。我们评估了基于dixon的信号下降(%drop)和脂肪分数百分比(%fat)作为现有方案的辅助手段的诊断价值和阅读器间可靠性。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性的双中心研究中,172例BM信号异常患者接受了标准化的1.5 t MRI方案,包括Dixon序列。两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生独立评估图像,并进行了百分比下降和百分比脂肪的定量测量。通过组织病理学(n = 96)或影像学随访(n = 76)确定最终诊断。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估诊断价值,采用Cohen’s κ系数评估读者间信度。结果:一致的最佳截断点为%drop≤19.8%,准确度为87.2%,灵敏度为95.3%,特异性为73.8%;%fat≤18.3%,准确度为86.6%,灵敏度为96.3%,特异性为70.8%。结论:定量MRI Dixon成像参数在鉴别BM良恶性病变方面表现出较高的诊断准确性和良好的读写器间可靠性,支持其作为常规MRI的可重复辅助手段在临床实践方案中实施。相关性声明:定量Dixon MRI提供了可重复的、无创的骨髓病变鉴别,具有跨解剖部位的高诊断准确性,增强了标准化阈值的临床决策,同时显示了优异的中心间一致性。重点:建立了定量Dixon MRI阈值%下降≤19.8%和%脂肪≤18.3%作为骨髓病变恶性程度的可靠预测指标。与传统的t1加权序列(79.2%)相比,Dixon指标显示出更高的诊断准确性(86.6-87.2%)。出色的阅读器间信度(κ = 0.895-0.943)支持定量Dixon MRI在临床实践中的重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信