The Effect of Eating Rate of Ultra-Processed Foods on Dietary Intake, Eating Behaviour, Body Composition and Metabolic Responses-Rationale, Design and Outcomes of the Restructure Randomised Controlled Trial.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Marlou P Lasschuijt, Lise A J Heuven, Marieke van Bruinessen, Zhen Liu, Josep Rubert, Markus Stieger, Kees de Graaf, Ciarán G Forde
{"title":"The Effect of Eating Rate of Ultra-Processed Foods on Dietary Intake, Eating Behaviour, Body Composition and Metabolic Responses-Rationale, Design and Outcomes of the Restructure Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Marlou P Lasschuijt, Lise A J Heuven, Marieke van Bruinessen, Zhen Liu, Josep Rubert, Markus Stieger, Kees de Graaf, Ciarán G Forde","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive epidemiological research and the findings from one randomised controlled feeding trial (RCT) have shown associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and higher energy intakes. To date the specific properties of UPF foods and diets that may be responsible for driving higher energy intakes remain unclear. A comparison of the diets in the single RCT to date showed a significantly higher eating rate (g/min, ER) for meals in the UPF diet compared to those in the minimally processed diet. Numerous acute feeding trials have shown that foods with textures that promote a slower ER tend to be consumed in smaller portions compared to those consumed at a faster ER. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for the Restructure RCT with the primary aim to determine the effect of meal texture-derived ER (g/min) of UPF diets ('UPF Slow ER' vs. 'UPF Fast ER') on daily ad libitum energy intake (kcal/day) across a 14-day period. The secondary objectives of the Restructure RCT are to compare changes in body composition and metabolic markers following the same two diets. We hypothesise that texture-derived differences in ER will moderate food and energy intakes from UPF diets such that participants will consume less when they encounter textures that promote a slower eating rate. The outcomes of the Restructure RCT aim to provide new insights on the proposed mechanisms by which UPF are thought to promote greater energy intakes, and aid in the development of food-based strategies to moderate dietary energy intakes from processed foods. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06113146.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive epidemiological research and the findings from one randomised controlled feeding trial (RCT) have shown associations between the consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and higher energy intakes. To date the specific properties of UPF foods and diets that may be responsible for driving higher energy intakes remain unclear. A comparison of the diets in the single RCT to date showed a significantly higher eating rate (g/min, ER) for meals in the UPF diet compared to those in the minimally processed diet. Numerous acute feeding trials have shown that foods with textures that promote a slower ER tend to be consumed in smaller portions compared to those consumed at a faster ER. Here, we describe the rationale and approach for the Restructure RCT with the primary aim to determine the effect of meal texture-derived ER (g/min) of UPF diets ('UPF Slow ER' vs. 'UPF Fast ER') on daily ad libitum energy intake (kcal/day) across a 14-day period. The secondary objectives of the Restructure RCT are to compare changes in body composition and metabolic markers following the same two diets. We hypothesise that texture-derived differences in ER will moderate food and energy intakes from UPF diets such that participants will consume less when they encounter textures that promote a slower eating rate. The outcomes of the Restructure RCT aim to provide new insights on the proposed mechanisms by which UPF are thought to promote greater energy intakes, and aid in the development of food-based strategies to moderate dietary energy intakes from processed foods. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06113146.

超加工食品摄取率对饮食摄入、饮食行为、身体成分和代谢反应的影响——重构随机对照试验的基本原理、设计和结果
广泛的流行病学研究和一项随机对照喂养试验(RCT)的结果表明,超加工食品(upf)的消费与较高的能量摄入之间存在关联。迄今为止,UPF食品和饮食的具体特性可能导致更高的能量摄入仍不清楚。迄今为止,单一随机对照试验中的饮食比较显示,UPF饮食中的膳食摄取率(g/min, ER)明显高于最低加工饮食。大量的急性喂养试验表明,与快速消化的食物相比,具有促进慢速消化的食物倾向于以更少的部分被食用。在这里,我们描述了重构随机对照试验的基本原理和方法,其主要目的是确定UPF饮食中膳食结构衍生的ER (g/min)的影响(“UPF慢ER”与“UPF慢ER”)。“UPF快速ER”)在14天内的每日自由能量摄入(千卡/天)。重组随机对照试验的第二个目标是比较相同两种饮食后身体成分和代谢指标的变化。我们假设内质网的质地差异会调节UPF饮食中的食物和能量摄入,因此当参与者遇到促进较慢进食速度的质地时,他们会消耗更少的食物。重组随机对照试验的结果旨在为UPF被认为促进更多能量摄入的拟议机制提供新的见解,并有助于制定以食物为基础的策略,以调节从加工食品中摄入的膳食能量。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06113146。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Bulletin
Nutrition Bulletin NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.10%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信