Safety of Acupuncture in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/19336586251360119
Ida Nurwati, Christopher Daniel Tristan, Kyra Modesty, Erlangga Masykur Kynaya, Ihsan Hanif, Nathania Ella Sudiono, Muhana Fawwazy Ilyas
{"title":"Safety of Acupuncture in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ida Nurwati, Christopher Daniel Tristan, Kyra Modesty, Erlangga Masykur Kynaya, Ihsan Hanif, Nathania Ella Sudiono, Muhana Fawwazy Ilyas","doi":"10.1177/19336586251360119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acupuncture has emerged as an effective adjunctive therapy for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with concern on the higher rate of adverse events (AE). In addition, timing of intervention, specific acupoints, and stimulation strength are concerning, as high-stimulation electroacupuncture (EA) may increase miscarriage risk. This review aims to systematically evaluate the safety profile of acupuncture in PCOS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched prior to September 8, 2024. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with \"control\" (sham/no acupuncture) or active drugs. Study quality was assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted with R Studio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1,041 articles, 13 RCTs were included. There was no significant serious or life-threatening AE occurred in all trials. In acupuncture versus control groups, mild to moderate AEs were similar overall, except bruising, which was significantly more frequent at needle insertion sites with acupuncture (OR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.76-6,37; <i>p</i> < 0.01). In acupuncture versus active drugs, there were no significantly higher mild to moderate AEs in the acupuncture group. Miscarriage rates were comparable with acupuncture versus controls or ovulation-induction drugs, particularly with low-frequency (2 Hz) EA applied prepregnancy. Collectively, the findings support acupuncture's safety profile, including no significant increase in miscarriage risk when administered prior to pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupuncture has emerged as a safe option for complementary therapy in PCOS. Further research is needed to refine acupuncture protocols, which further position it as a preferred adjunctive treatment in PCOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"37 4","pages":"281-291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19336586251360119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acupuncture has emerged as an effective adjunctive therapy for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with concern on the higher rate of adverse events (AE). In addition, timing of intervention, specific acupoints, and stimulation strength are concerning, as high-stimulation electroacupuncture (EA) may increase miscarriage risk. This review aims to systematically evaluate the safety profile of acupuncture in PCOS.

Materials and methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched prior to September 8, 2024. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing acupuncture with "control" (sham/no acupuncture) or active drugs. Study quality was assessed using RoB 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted with R Studio.

Results: From 1,041 articles, 13 RCTs were included. There was no significant serious or life-threatening AE occurred in all trials. In acupuncture versus control groups, mild to moderate AEs were similar overall, except bruising, which was significantly more frequent at needle insertion sites with acupuncture (OR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.76-6,37; p < 0.01). In acupuncture versus active drugs, there were no significantly higher mild to moderate AEs in the acupuncture group. Miscarriage rates were comparable with acupuncture versus controls or ovulation-induction drugs, particularly with low-frequency (2 Hz) EA applied prepregnancy. Collectively, the findings support acupuncture's safety profile, including no significant increase in miscarriage risk when administered prior to pregnancy.

Conclusions: Acupuncture has emerged as a safe option for complementary therapy in PCOS. Further research is needed to refine acupuncture protocols, which further position it as a preferred adjunctive treatment in PCOS.

针灸治疗多囊卵巢综合征的安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
导论:针灸已成为治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的有效辅助疗法,但其不良事件(AE)发生率较高。此外,由于高刺激电针(EA)可能增加流产风险,干预的时机、特定的穴位和刺激强度也值得关注。本综述旨在系统评价针灸治疗多囊卵巢综合征的安全性。材料和方法:2024年9月8日前检索PubMed、ScienceDirect和Scopus。这项研究包括随机对照试验(rct),将针灸与“对照组”(假针灸/不针灸)或活性药物进行比较。采用RoB 2.0评价研究质量。使用R Studio进行meta分析。结果:1041篇文章中纳入13项随机对照试验。所有试验均未发生严重或危及生命的AE。针刺组与对照组相比,轻中度不良事件总体上相似,但针刺组在针扎部位出现瘀伤的频率明显更高(OR = 3.34; 95% CI: 1.76-6,37; p < 0.01)。针刺组与活性药物组相比,轻中度不良事件发生率无显著增高。流产率与针刺与对照组或促排卵药物相当,特别是在孕前应用低频(2 Hz) EA。总的来说,这些发现支持针灸的安全性,包括在怀孕前使用针灸不会显著增加流产风险。结论:针灸已成为多囊卵巢综合征补充治疗的安全选择。需要进一步的研究来完善针灸方案,进一步将其定位为PCOS的首选辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信