Analysis of Adverse Events in Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatments in Japan and the Current Situation of Hiroshima University Hospital Kampo Clinical Center.

IF 0.9 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Medical Acupuncture Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1089/acu.2024.0188
Yaxuan Jiang, Hongyang Li, Yukari Uryu, Keiko Hirose, Yihan Yuan, Yunxia Wang, Yoshihiro Tamura, Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai
{"title":"Analysis of Adverse Events in Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatments in Japan and the Current Situation of Hiroshima University Hospital Kampo Clinical Center.","authors":"Yaxuan Jiang, Hongyang Li, Yukari Uryu, Keiko Hirose, Yihan Yuan, Yunxia Wang, Yoshihiro Tamura, Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai","doi":"10.1089/acu.2024.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acupuncture and moxibustion (AM) are effective for pain relief and chronic disease management but carry risks of adverse events (AEs). Japan prioritizes AM safety, and Hiroshima University Hospital Kampo Clinical Center (HUHKCC) follows strict professional standards to ensure both safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study analyzes AM-related AEs in Japan over the past decade, compares them with HUHKCC practices, and proposes risk mitigation strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AM-related AEs from 2013 to 2024 were reviewed using case reports from the Ichushi-Web, CiNii, and Accident Information Data Bank System (AIDBS) databases, alongside data from HUHKCC (October 2023-2024). Patient information and AEs were collected from electronic medical records and a survey of six acupuncturists. Data analysis was performed using bibliometric methods in Excel and BioVenn.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An analysis of 55 studies and 153 AEs showed a fluctuating trend, with insertion needle technique (INT) accounting for 89.1%. Common AEs included internal injuries (32.7%) and infections (21.8%). AIDBS data indicated 12 AEs annually, with 66% from INT and 33% from moxibustion. Conversely, HUHKCC's 568 sessions reported no adverse effects; however, side effects such as fatigue or localized pain were reported in 10 cases. One reason for less AEs is that contact needle technique (CNT) was used in 96.8% of sessions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite Japan's emphasis on AM safety, AM-related AEs remain consistent. Although effectiveness of each technique requires evaluation, the HUHKCC model, with its focus on CNT, diagnostics, and practitioner training, might effectively mitigate AEs and offer a valuable framework for improving AM safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":45511,"journal":{"name":"Medical Acupuncture","volume":"37 4","pages":"312-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Acupuncture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acu.2024.0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acupuncture and moxibustion (AM) are effective for pain relief and chronic disease management but carry risks of adverse events (AEs). Japan prioritizes AM safety, and Hiroshima University Hospital Kampo Clinical Center (HUHKCC) follows strict professional standards to ensure both safety and efficacy.

Objectives: The study analyzes AM-related AEs in Japan over the past decade, compares them with HUHKCC practices, and proposes risk mitigation strategies.

Methods: AM-related AEs from 2013 to 2024 were reviewed using case reports from the Ichushi-Web, CiNii, and Accident Information Data Bank System (AIDBS) databases, alongside data from HUHKCC (October 2023-2024). Patient information and AEs were collected from electronic medical records and a survey of six acupuncturists. Data analysis was performed using bibliometric methods in Excel and BioVenn.

Results: An analysis of 55 studies and 153 AEs showed a fluctuating trend, with insertion needle technique (INT) accounting for 89.1%. Common AEs included internal injuries (32.7%) and infections (21.8%). AIDBS data indicated 12 AEs annually, with 66% from INT and 33% from moxibustion. Conversely, HUHKCC's 568 sessions reported no adverse effects; however, side effects such as fatigue or localized pain were reported in 10 cases. One reason for less AEs is that contact needle technique (CNT) was used in 96.8% of sessions.

Conclusions: Despite Japan's emphasis on AM safety, AM-related AEs remain consistent. Although effectiveness of each technique requires evaluation, the HUHKCC model, with its focus on CNT, diagnostics, and practitioner training, might effectively mitigate AEs and offer a valuable framework for improving AM safety.

日本针灸治疗不良事件分析及广岛大学医院康坡临床中心现状
背景:针刺和艾灸(AM)是有效的疼痛缓解和慢性疾病的管理,但具有不良事件(ae)的风险。日本优先考虑AM的安全性,广岛大学医院康坡临床中心(HUHKCC)遵循严格的专业标准,以确保安全性和有效性。目的:本研究分析了过去十年日本与am相关的ae,并将其与HUHKCC的做法进行了比较,并提出了风险缓解策略。方法:使用Ichushi-Web、CiNii和事故信息数据库系统(AIDBS)数据库中的病例报告,以及HUHKCC(2023-2024年10月)的数据,对2013 -2024年am相关的ae进行回顾。从电子病历和对6名针灸师的调查中收集患者信息和ae。采用文献计量学方法在Excel和BioVenn中进行数据分析。结果:55项研究和153例ae分析显示波动趋势,其中插入针技术(INT)占89.1%。常见的ae包括内伤(32.7%)和感染(21.8%)。AIDBS数据显示,每年发生12例ae,其中66%来自INT, 33%来自艾灸。相反,HUHKCC的568次会议没有报告不良反应;然而,有10例报告了疲劳或局部疼痛等副作用。ae较少的一个原因是96.8%的疗程使用了接触针技术(CNT)。结论:尽管日本强调AM的安全性,AM相关的ae仍然是一致的。虽然每种技术的有效性都需要评估,但HUHKCC模型,其重点是碳纳米管,诊断和从业人员培训,可能有效地减轻ae,并为提高AM安全性提供有价值的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Acupuncture
Medical Acupuncture INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信