Bennett M Hardy, Timothy Korpita, Erin Muths, W Chris Funk, Larissa L Bailey
{"title":"Boreal Toad Survival Varies by Degree of Attenuation and Adaptation of a Fungal Pathogen.","authors":"Bennett M Hardy, Timothy Korpita, Erin Muths, W Chris Funk, Larissa L Bailey","doi":"10.1007/s10393-025-01749-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is a fungal pathogen responsible for dramatic declines of amphibian populations around the world. Experimental exposure studies have documented differences in host susceptibility to Bd, but variation in study designs may limit our ability to compare inferences across studies. Using laboratory-maintained pathogen cultures that may lose virulence over time (i.e., pathogen attenuation) or exposing hosts to foreign or local strains are choices that could affect hosts differently. To test how these study design choices affect resulting inference, we exposed a vulnerable anuran species, the boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas), to three strains of Bd that varied in passage history and geographic origin and measured differences on host survival. We also examined strain-specific information reported in 58 publications of Bd exposure experiments to investigate the potential for reproducibility across studies. We found that boreal toads exposed to strains with many passes had higher weekly survival probabilities than those exposed to the strain with few passes, indicating likely pathogen attenuation in strains with higher passage history. We also found evidence for local adaptation of Bd to its host. Eighty-eight percent of publications summarized did not report the number of Bd passages. Our findings suggest that strains with fewer passes in culture are better suited for exposure studies seeking to understand differences in host susceptibility and that the amount of passes can dramatically affect inference gained across studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-025-01749-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is a fungal pathogen responsible for dramatic declines of amphibian populations around the world. Experimental exposure studies have documented differences in host susceptibility to Bd, but variation in study designs may limit our ability to compare inferences across studies. Using laboratory-maintained pathogen cultures that may lose virulence over time (i.e., pathogen attenuation) or exposing hosts to foreign or local strains are choices that could affect hosts differently. To test how these study design choices affect resulting inference, we exposed a vulnerable anuran species, the boreal toad (Anaxyrus boreas boreas), to three strains of Bd that varied in passage history and geographic origin and measured differences on host survival. We also examined strain-specific information reported in 58 publications of Bd exposure experiments to investigate the potential for reproducibility across studies. We found that boreal toads exposed to strains with many passes had higher weekly survival probabilities than those exposed to the strain with few passes, indicating likely pathogen attenuation in strains with higher passage history. We also found evidence for local adaptation of Bd to its host. Eighty-eight percent of publications summarized did not report the number of Bd passages. Our findings suggest that strains with fewer passes in culture are better suited for exposure studies seeking to understand differences in host susceptibility and that the amount of passes can dramatically affect inference gained across studies.
期刊介绍:
EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity.
The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas:
One Health and Conservation Medicine
o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability
o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants
o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems
o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems
o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems
Ecosystem Approaches to Health
o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health
o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.