Social media and cytopathology (#cytopath) education: developing a curated online resource index and exploring the evolution of e-learning.

Q2 Medicine
Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota, Muhammad Ahsan, Sarah Mohamed, Casey P Schukow, Meredith K Herman, Hafsa Nebbache, Lavisha S Punjabi, Brandon D Metcalf, Deepama Upreti, Luca Cima, Fnu Poombal, Muhammad Moseeb Ali Hashim, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang
{"title":"Social media and cytopathology (#cytopath) education: developing a curated online resource index and exploring the evolution of e-learning.","authors":"Swikrity Upadhyay Baskota, Muhammad Ahsan, Sarah Mohamed, Casey P Schukow, Meredith K Herman, Hafsa Nebbache, Lavisha S Punjabi, Brandon D Metcalf, Deepama Upreti, Luca Cima, Fnu Poombal, Muhammad Moseeb Ali Hashim, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, social media (SoMe) has revolutionized medical education within the field of pathology; however, its performance in cytopathology has not been explored in detail. This systematic review aims to analyze SoMe trends, hashtag metrics, and online resources within cytopathology over the period of 7 years. A systematic review of 4 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus) was conducted between January 1st, 2017, and December 22nd, 2022, in order to identify relevant English-language articles about SoMe and cytopathology. An index for online cytopathology (#cytopath) resources was created and posted on Knowledge In Knowledge Out on May 12, 2025. Sixteen studies were included for final analysis, dating from 2017 to 2023. The most commonly cited SoMe platforms used among cytopathologists were X (Twitter) (42%) and Facebook (26%) (P = 0.002). A variety of hashtags were used across posts: #Cytology (24%), #Cytopath (24%), #FNAFriday (24%), #Pathology (16%), and #Cytopathology (12%) (P = 0.865). Two studies discussed the use of SoMe in cytopathology during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting its role as a rapid communication tool in times of crisis. The most highly followed cytopathology accounts on X were @cytopathology (10,510), @IACytology (3639), and @britishcytology (3062). This systematic review shows how SoMe is enhancing networking, case discussion, and education in cytopathology. Although it could revolutionize professional communication, it still poses issues regarding privacy and possible misinformation. Future research and guidelines are necessary to optimize the use of SoMe in cytopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, social media (SoMe) has revolutionized medical education within the field of pathology; however, its performance in cytopathology has not been explored in detail. This systematic review aims to analyze SoMe trends, hashtag metrics, and online resources within cytopathology over the period of 7 years. A systematic review of 4 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus) was conducted between January 1st, 2017, and December 22nd, 2022, in order to identify relevant English-language articles about SoMe and cytopathology. An index for online cytopathology (#cytopath) resources was created and posted on Knowledge In Knowledge Out on May 12, 2025. Sixteen studies were included for final analysis, dating from 2017 to 2023. The most commonly cited SoMe platforms used among cytopathologists were X (Twitter) (42%) and Facebook (26%) (P = 0.002). A variety of hashtags were used across posts: #Cytology (24%), #Cytopath (24%), #FNAFriday (24%), #Pathology (16%), and #Cytopathology (12%) (P = 0.865). Two studies discussed the use of SoMe in cytopathology during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting its role as a rapid communication tool in times of crisis. The most highly followed cytopathology accounts on X were @cytopathology (10,510), @IACytology (3639), and @britishcytology (3062). This systematic review shows how SoMe is enhancing networking, case discussion, and education in cytopathology. Although it could revolutionize professional communication, it still poses issues regarding privacy and possible misinformation. Future research and guidelines are necessary to optimize the use of SoMe in cytopathology.

社会媒体和细胞病理学(#cytopath)教育:开发策划在线资源索引,探索电子学习的演变。
近年来,社交媒体(SoMe)彻底改变了病理学领域的医学教育;然而,其在细胞病理学上的表现尚未得到详细的探讨。本系统综述旨在分析7年来细胞病理学的一些趋势、标签指标和在线资源。我们在2017年1月1日至2022年12月22日期间对PubMed、Medline、Embase和Scopus 4个数据库进行了系统综述,以确定有关SoMe和细胞病理学的相关英文文章。在线细胞病理学(#cytopath)资源索引于2025年5月12日创建并发布在Knowledge In Knowledge Out上。最终分析纳入了16项研究,时间从2017年到2023年。细胞病理学家最常引用的一些平台是X (Twitter)(42%)和Facebook (26%) (P = 0.002)。帖子中使用了各种各样的标签:#细胞学(24%),#细胞病理学(24%),# fnaffriday(24%), #病理学(16%)和#细胞病理学(12%)(P = 0.865)。两项研究讨论了在COVID-19大流行期间SoMe在细胞病理学中的应用,强调了其在危机时期作为快速沟通工具的作用。X上关注最多的细胞病理学账号是@cytopathology (10,510), @IACytology(3639)和@britishcytology(3062)。本文系统回顾了SoMe如何加强细胞病理学的网络、病例讨论和教育。尽管它可能会彻底改变职业交流,但它仍然存在隐私和可能的错误信息方面的问题。未来的研究和指南是必要的,以优化SoMe在细胞病理学中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信