Revising the Standard Definition of Hallucination: Delirium and Schizophrenia.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2025-09-09 DOI:10.1159/000548200
Kasper Møller Nielsen, Julie Nordgaard, Søren Overgaard, Mads Gram Henriksen
{"title":"Revising the Standard Definition of Hallucination: Delirium and Schizophrenia.","authors":"Kasper Møller Nielsen, Julie Nordgaard, Søren Overgaard, Mads Gram Henriksen","doi":"10.1159/000548200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to the standard definition, a hallucination is 1) a perceptual experience occurring in the absence of a relevant perceptual object, 2) it has the sense of reality of a veridical perception, and 3) it is unwilled and not under voluntary control of the hallucinator. This definition is supposed to encompass all hallucinations, across mental disorders and experiential modalities.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In this article, we examine the standard definition's validity by comparing visual hallucinations in delirium and auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) in schizophrenia, focusing especially on the definition's second criterion, i.e., the sense of reality criterion. Our analysis reveals stark differences between these two disorders, their concomitant experiential structures, and the experience of hallucinations. While hallucinated objects are experienced as real in both disorders, they are typically not experienced as real in the same sense of the term. In delirium, hallucinatory objects are experienced as real in the way perceptual objects are, and they often are indistinguishable from such objects. In schizophrenia, by contrast, hallucinatory objects are often not experienced as real in the way perceptual objects are, and they often are distinguishable from such objects.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>An appreciation of the different kinds of sense of reality of hallucinations is relevant for developing more precise psychopathological concepts, clinical care, and empirical research. Based on our findings, we offer a revision of the standard definition of hallucination, making it valid for the variety of hallucinations that are found across mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the standard definition, a hallucination is 1) a perceptual experience occurring in the absence of a relevant perceptual object, 2) it has the sense of reality of a veridical perception, and 3) it is unwilled and not under voluntary control of the hallucinator. This definition is supposed to encompass all hallucinations, across mental disorders and experiential modalities.

Summary: In this article, we examine the standard definition's validity by comparing visual hallucinations in delirium and auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) in schizophrenia, focusing especially on the definition's second criterion, i.e., the sense of reality criterion. Our analysis reveals stark differences between these two disorders, their concomitant experiential structures, and the experience of hallucinations. While hallucinated objects are experienced as real in both disorders, they are typically not experienced as real in the same sense of the term. In delirium, hallucinatory objects are experienced as real in the way perceptual objects are, and they often are indistinguishable from such objects. In schizophrenia, by contrast, hallucinatory objects are often not experienced as real in the way perceptual objects are, and they often are distinguishable from such objects.

Key message: An appreciation of the different kinds of sense of reality of hallucinations is relevant for developing more precise psychopathological concepts, clinical care, and empirical research. Based on our findings, we offer a revision of the standard definition of hallucination, making it valid for the variety of hallucinations that are found across mental disorders.

修订幻觉的标准定义:谵妄和精神分裂症。
背景:根据标准定义,幻觉是1)在没有相关感知对象的情况下发生的感知体验,2)它具有真实感知的现实感,3)它是非自愿的,不受幻觉者的自愿控制。这个定义应该包括所有的幻觉,跨越精神障碍和经验模式。摘要:在本文中,我们通过比较谵妄的视觉幻觉和精神分裂症的言语幻听(AVHs)来检验标准定义的有效性,特别关注定义的第二个标准,即现实感标准。我们的分析揭示了这两种疾病、伴随的体验结构和幻觉体验之间的明显差异。虽然在这两种疾病中,幻觉中的物体都被认为是真实的,但它们通常不是同一意义上的真实。在谵妄中,幻觉对象被体验为真实的,就像感知对象一样,它们通常与感知对象无法区分。相比之下,在精神分裂症中,幻觉对象通常不像感知对象那样被视为真实,而且它们通常与感知对象区分开来。关键信息:对不同种类的幻觉真实感的理解,对于发展更精确的精神病理学概念、临床护理和实证研究具有重要意义。基于我们的发现,我们对幻觉的标准定义进行了修订,使其适用于精神障碍中发现的各种幻觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信