Marisa J Brennan, Kristopher S Criscione, Jacob A Olichney, Junyan Ding, Yilin Fang, Nate McDowell, Brett T Wolfe
{"title":"Hydraulic constraints to stomatal conductance in flooded trees.","authors":"Marisa J Brennan, Kristopher S Criscione, Jacob A Olichney, Junyan Ding, Yilin Fang, Nate McDowell, Brett T Wolfe","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stomatal closure is a pervasive response among trees exposed to flooded soil. We tested whether this response is caused by reduced hydraulic conductance in the soil-to-leaf hydraulic continuum (k<sub>total</sub>), and particularly by reduced root hydraulic conductance (k<sub>root</sub>), which has been widely hypothesized. We tracked stomatal conductance at the leaf level (g<sub>s</sub>) and canopy scale (G<sub>s</sub>) along with physiological conditions in two temperate tree species, Magnolia grandiflora and Quercus virginiana, that were subjected to flood and control conditions in a greenhouse experiment. Flooding reduced g<sub>s</sub>, G<sub>s</sub>, k<sub>root</sub> and k<sub>total</sub>. Path analysis showed strong support for direct effects of k<sub>total</sub> on g<sub>s</sub> and for flood duration on k<sub>total</sub>, but not k<sub>root</sub> on k<sub>total</sub>. A process-based model that accounted for the k<sub>total</sub> reduction predicted the timeseries of G<sub>s</sub> in flood and control treatment trees reasonably well (predicted versus observed G<sub>s</sub> R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80 and 0.51 for M. grandiflora and Q. virginiana, respectively). However, accounting only for k<sub>root</sub> reduction in flooded trees was insufficient for predicting observed G<sub>s</sub> reduction. Together, these results suggest that hydraulic constraints were not limited to roots and highlight the need to account for flooding effects on k<sub>total</sub> when projecting forest ecosystem function using process-based models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 10","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12423221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05789-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Stomatal closure is a pervasive response among trees exposed to flooded soil. We tested whether this response is caused by reduced hydraulic conductance in the soil-to-leaf hydraulic continuum (ktotal), and particularly by reduced root hydraulic conductance (kroot), which has been widely hypothesized. We tracked stomatal conductance at the leaf level (gs) and canopy scale (Gs) along with physiological conditions in two temperate tree species, Magnolia grandiflora and Quercus virginiana, that were subjected to flood and control conditions in a greenhouse experiment. Flooding reduced gs, Gs, kroot and ktotal. Path analysis showed strong support for direct effects of ktotal on gs and for flood duration on ktotal, but not kroot on ktotal. A process-based model that accounted for the ktotal reduction predicted the timeseries of Gs in flood and control treatment trees reasonably well (predicted versus observed Gs R2 = 0.80 and 0.51 for M. grandiflora and Q. virginiana, respectively). However, accounting only for kroot reduction in flooded trees was insufficient for predicting observed Gs reduction. Together, these results suggest that hydraulic constraints were not limited to roots and highlight the need to account for flooding effects on ktotal when projecting forest ecosystem function using process-based models.
期刊介绍:
Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas:
Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology,
Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology.
In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.